The purpose of the study is to evaluate the incidence of artifacts in the developed AIMS database
At first, the authors evaluated the accuracy of the traditional, manually completed paper-based documentation, which sets a benchmark for the accuracy that the electronic documentation and database provides. At the second portion, the investigators used the paper-based documentation as a standard to compare the electronic documentation. The incidence of artifact was double checked by two investigators. At the third portion, the authors calculated the artifact incidence in the AIMS database, using paper based and electric document anesthesia records as the standard respectively.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
to evaluate the incidence of artifacts in the AIMS database by paper-based anesthesia record
to evaluate the incidence of artifacts in the AIMS database by electronic documents anesthesia record
MacKay Memorial Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
percentage of artifacts
to evaluate how many percentage of artifacts for each of the included parameters
Time frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
deviating values
to calculate the number of values deviating from the predefined baseline value
Time frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
percentage of devotional artifacts
to evaluate how many percentage of the deviations are artifacts
Time frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
episodes of artifacts
to find out the average of number of episodes across each artifact
Time frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
causes of artifacts
to find out the cause of the artifact and respective percentage
Time frame: intraoperative (from the beginning to the end of anesthesia record)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.