Significant left main (LM) stenosis is associated with a poor prognosis, therefore, adequate judgement of the prognostic significance of LM stenosis is essential to improve patients' prognosis. Recently, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become widespread practice and carries a Class Ia recommendation to assess functional significance of intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with stable angina. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived minimum lumen area (MLA) represents an accurate measure to determine LM significance as shown in multiple studies, while optical coherence tomography (OCT) ,which is a novel intracoronary imaging method with a greater spatial resolution (15μm vs. 100μm), faster image acquisition and facilitated image interpretation, OCT derived-MLA has never been validated against FFR and accordingly, it is not mentioned in the current guidelines for myocardial revascularization. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has emerged as a noninvasive alternative of coronary angiography with its excellent negative predictive value, while the positive predictive value of CTA is limited. Computational fluid dynamics is an emerging method that enables prediction of blood flow in coronary arteries and calculation of FFR from computed tomography (FFRCT) noninvasively. Noninvasive and accurate assessment of functional significance would bring a great benefit for patients with LM stenosis, however, there are no data to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT for LM stenosis in comparison with FFR and minimal lumen area derived by OCT. This study will investigate the optimal OCT-derived MLA cut-off point and the diagnostic performance of FFRCT for intermediate LM stenosis compared with FFR ≤0.8 as a reference standard.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
104
Multimodality assessment of intermediate left main stenosis: Comparison of optical coherence tomography-derived minimal lumen area, invasive fractional flow reserve and FFRCT
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
RECRUITINGInstitute Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, France
RECRUITINGCentre Cardiologique du Nord
Saint-Denis, France
RECRUITINGUniversitätsklinikum Giessen Justus-Liebig Universität
Giessen, Hesse, Germany
RECRUITINGFriedrich Alexander Universität (FAU) , Medizinische Klinik 2 , Kardiologie und Angiologie
Erlangen, Germany
RECRUITINGAgeo Central General Hospital
Ageo, Japan
RECRUITINGGifu heart center
Gifu, Japan
RECRUITINGDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Shinshu University School of Medicine
Nagano, Japan
RECRUITINGKansai Medical University,
Osaka, Japan
RECRUITINGMedical Corporation Ouyuukai Tokorozawa Heart Center
Saitama, Japan
RECRUITING...and 3 more locations
OCT vs. FFR
\- The area under the curve of OCT-derived MLA for FFR≤0.8
Time frame: Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. FFR
-The optimal cut-off point of OCT-derived MLA from receiver-operator characteristics curves for FFR≤0.8
Time frame: Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
FFRCT vs. FFR
Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FFRCT≤0.8 for FFR≤0.8
Time frame: Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT, QFR
\- The area under the curve and the optimal cut-off point of OCT-derived MLA from receiver-operator characteristics curves for FFR≤0.75, RFR≤0.89, resting Pd/Pa≤0.91, and FFRCT≤0.80 and QFR≤0.80
Time frame: Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT
\- Predictability of MLA, minimal lumen diameter, area stenosis, lesion length, eccentricity index, and plaque characteristics (plaque rupture, fibroatheroma, and calcification) for FFR ≤0.8, FFR≤0.75, RFR≤0.89, resting Pd/Pa≤0.91, and FFRCT≤0.80 and QFR≤0.80
Time frame: Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, FFRCT
\- Correlation among OCT-derived MLA, FFR, RFR, resting Pd/Pa, and FFRCT and QFR
Time frame: Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. CTA
\- Correlation between luminal diameter stenosis of CTA and OCT-derived MLA
Time frame: Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
OCT vs. CTA
\- Diagnostic accuracy of plaque characteristics with presumed high risk characteristics including napkin ring sign, low attenuation plaque (\<30HU), positive remodelling (remodelling index \>1.1), and spotty calcium (\<3mm) for thin and thick cap fibroatheroma by OCT.
Time frame: Measurement at Procedure/ Baseline Visit
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Death
Time frame: 12 Month
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: 12 Month
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Target vessel myocardial infarction
Time frame: 12 Month
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 12 Month
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Target vessel revascularization
Time frame: 12 Month
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Any revascularization
Time frame: 12 Month
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Stent thrombosis
Time frame: 12 Month
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Stroke and transient ischemic attack
Time frame: 12 Month
Clinical endpoint at 1 year
Acute renal failure
Time frame: 12 Month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.