Prospective long-term evaluation of the performance and safety of Calistar S for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair in women with anterior POP with or without apical vaginal involvement
Calistar S Single Incision Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Repair System is intended for transvaginal reestablishment and reinforcement of the physiologic anatomy of the female pelvic floor in non-fertile women with anterior pelvic organ prolapse with or without apical vaginal wall involvement in both, recurrent pelvic organ prolapse and primary pelvic organ prolapse when other surgical procedures are expected to fail (i.e. complex primary prolapse). The treatment kit consists of the lightweight mesh, two single-use introducers and 3 tissue anchoring system (TAS) anchors for fixation to the sacrospinous ligament. The product is approved in accordance with the CE Directive 93/42/EEC. The utilization of synthetic implants in POP repair became increasingly popular in the last decade. The cumulative success rate of synthetic implants in anterior compartment repair is as high as up to 93%.However, meshes have been recently scrutinized due to high adverse event reporting after unreflected utilization of meshes which raised concerns of patients safety; furthermore taking into account the complexity of adverse event mesh management. This led to a vanishing of various meshes in transvaginal POP repair. Nevertheless, the further development of light weight meshes, the experience of the surgeon and the assessment and patients selection are well known factors reducing the rate of adverse events significantly. Therefore, in the current trial the efficacy and safety of calistar S in a highly selected patient population will be evaluated.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
180
synthetic mesh for anterior pelvic organ prolapse with or without apical vaginal wall involvement via the vaginal route in a highly selected patient population
Helios Hospital Erfurt, Department of gynaecology
Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany
St. Hedwig Hospital
Berlin, Germany
Evangelic Diakonie Hospital
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
St. Elisabeth-Hospital Leipzig
Leipzig, Germany
Number of Patients with Cure of pelvic organ prolapse
Number of patients accomplishing the composite endpoint after 24 months including anatomic, subjective and retreatment components
Time frame: 24 months
Change of prolapse specific quality of life according the validated Questionnaire Prolapse quality of life questionnaire in comparison between baseline and follow-up
Differences between Baseline and Follow-Up result of the questionnaire of each patient regarding Quality of life and the correlating domains will be evaluated. P-QoL, Score: 0-100, the higher the score, the higher the impact of prolapse symptoms and the lower quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Change of sexual life according the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire in comparison between Baseline and follow-up
Differences between Baseline and Follow-Up result of each patient regarding Sexual life and the correlating domains will be evaluated. PISQ-IR, Score: 0-100, the higher the score, the higher the impact of prolapse symptoms and the higher the impact on sexual life.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Change of pain according Visual Analog Scale of Pain in comparison between baseline, postoperative and follow-up
Differences of pain-evaluation between Baseline and Follow-Up of each patient will be evaluated. Wong Baker Pain Scale, Score: 0 - 10, The higher the score, the higher the pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 24-48h postoperatively, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Patients subjective evaluation of satisfaction with surgery according the Patient Global Impression of Improvement
Evaluation of the improvement of POP after the operation assed by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement of each patient. PGI-I, Score: 7 Likert scale from: very much better to very much worse,
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hospital Tettnang
Tettnang, Germany
University Hospital Tübingen
Tübingen, Germany
Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Patient subjective evaluation of POP severity according the Global Impression of Severity
Evaluation of severity categorization by assing the Patient Global Impression of Severity of each patient at Baseline. Score. 4 Likert scale, from no impact to very much impact. A
Time frame: Baseline
Change of quality of life according the EQ-5L-5D in comparison between baseline and follow-up
Evaluation of Quality of life assessed by the EQ-5L-5D and evaluation of differences between Baseline and Follow-Up of each patient regarding health related Quality of life. Two scores: a) 5 Likert scale from no problems to extreme problems. b) self administered quality of life in scale 0 - 100, the higher the score the better the quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Anatomical success according the number of patients with anterior vaginal wall at or above the hymen and no decent of apical vaginal wall at or greater than half of the total vanilla lengths
Anatomical success defined by the number of patients with the anterior vaginal wall at or above the hymen (Aa and Ba ≤ 0 ) and separately no decent of apical vaginal wall at or greater than half of the total vaginal lengths (C \< -½ TVL).
Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Number of patients with necessity of repeated surgery due to recurrent anterior or apical Number of patients with Repeat surgery due to symptomatic recurrence of anterior or apical POP
Number of patients with necessity of repeated surgery due to recurrent anterior or apical POP.
Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Safety of Calistar S according the number of adverse events
Safety of Calistar S according the assessment of total amount of adverse events
Time frame: intraoperative, postoperative, 6 weeks, and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months and unscheduled visits
Exposure and anatomical-failure free survival
Estimation of exposure- and anatomical-failure free survival according Kaplan meier
Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Number of patients with further surgery for stress urinary incontinence
To assess the number of patients with further surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Change of urinary incontinence according the ICIQ-UI-Sf in comparison between baseline and follow-up
The international Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence - Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) is a validated questionnaire to asses urinary incontinence. Score 0-21, overall score with greater values indicating increased symptom severity
Time frame: Baseline 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Change of overactive bladder symptoms according the ICIQ-OAB in comparison between baseline and follow-up
The International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire - Overacitve bladder (ICIQ-OAB) is a validated questionnaire.. 0-16 overall score with greater values indicating increased symptom severity
Time frame: Baseline 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months
Cure in short-, mid-, and longterm follow-up
Number of patients accomplishing the composite outcome at remaining follow-up times
Time frame: 6 weeks and 6, 12, 36, 48, 60 months