The study is evaluating the effect of combining Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) with standard Physiotherapy treatment in patients admitted to a neurological rehabilitation unit with Pusher syndrome (PS). Patients will be randomised to receive standard Physiotherapy treatment or standard treatment with GVS. Perceived verticality data will also be collected and analysed on age-matched controls. This data will be used to compare these results with the patients with PS. The investigators hypothesis that GVS and standard Physiotherapy treatment will lead to a greater improvement in functional ability and awareness of perceived verticality compared to standard Physiotherapy alone.
Pusher syndrome (PS) can be described as disordered balance and orientation which causes patients to perceive they are in an upright position when in fact they are positioned towards their affected side. These patients use their unaffected limbs to 'push' themselves away from their unaffected side in an attempt to correct their perceived postural alignment. PS is a common disorder and can affect 16% of stroke patients. Patients with PS have shown to take longer to improve in rehabilitation than non-PS patients and tend to stay in hospital for longer. Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) involves passing a small electrical current behind the ear to stimulate the vestibular system to in-turn cause the head and body to move.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Electrical current (under 1.5mA) applied to the mastoid processes to stimulate the balance organs in the inner ear
45 minutes of standard physiotherapy treating impairments and functional problems
Imperial College London
London, United Kingdom
Scale of Contraversive Pushing
This is made up of 3 components: 1.The symmetry of spontaneous body posture (rated with 0, 0.25, 0.75, or 1 point. 1 = severe tilt, 0 = no tilt), 2. The use of non-paretic extremities (0, 0.5, or 1 point. 1 = performed spontaneously at rest), 3. The resistance to passive correction of the tilted posture (0 or 1 point. 1 = resistance occurs). For a diagnosis of Pusher Syndrome all 3 components need to be present.
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2
The Burke Lateropulsion Scale
Test of pushing. The score for each component is rated on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 to 4 for standing) and the score is based on the severity of resistance or the tilt angle when the patient begins to resist the passive movement. The score for diagnosis of Pusher behaviour is ≥2 points
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2
Catherine Bergago Scale
The Catherine Bergego Scale is a standardized checklist (10 everyday tasks) to detect presence and degree of neglect during observation of everyday life situations. The scale also provides a measure of neglect self-awareness (anosognosia).4 point rating scale indicating severity of neglect (0 = no neglect, 3 = severe neglect).
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2
Mesulam's symbol cancellation test
Mesulam's symbol cancellation test provides a measure of neglect, organisational process, and attention.
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2
Berg Balance Scale
14-item scale designed to measure balance of the older adult in a clinical setting. A five-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0-4. "0" indicates the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function. Score the LOWEST performance. Total Score = 56
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Functional Impairment Measure
18-item of physical, psychological and social function.The tool is used to assess a patient's level of disability as well as change in patient status in response to rehabilitation or medical intervention. Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item.
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2
Subjective Visual Vertical
Test of perceived visual vertical alignment
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2
Subjective Postural Vertical
Test of perceived postural vertical alignment
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2
Subjective haptic vertical
Test of perceived haptic vertical alignment
Time frame: Change from baseline, end of week 1 and end of week 2