Does Surgical-approach Affect Outcome After Fixation of Intra-articular Fractures of Distal Humerus?

Overview

observational study at tertiary care hospital and level 1 trauma centre aiming to evaluate the difference between two common surgical approaches to distal humerus fracture fixation.

Fractures around the distal humerus fractures make up to 2% of all fractures. Complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures present as challenge to restore of painless, stable and mobile elbow joint. Surgical exposure to all critical structures is of paramount importance to achieve anatomic reduction. Conflict still persists regarding the choice of ideal approach between triceps-sparing approach compared with olecranon osteotomy approach. In this study investigators compare the effect of surgical approach triceps lifting vs olecranon osteotomy on the functional outcome after fixation of distal humerus intra-articular fractures. Investigators conducted a non-funded, non-commercial, retrospective cohort study on participants with closed distal humerus intra-articular fractures between 2010 and 2015 at our tertiary care level-1 trauma and university hospital. Participants \>18 years of age with closed complex intra-articular distal humerus fracture were operated using two different surgical approaches, either triceps lifting approach (Group1) or with olecranon osteotomy (Group 2). Functional evaluation of the participant is carried out with quick DASH scores at the final 1 year follow-up. Investigators concluded that triceps lifting approach can be used equally efficiently for exposure of these complex distal humerus injuries with no comprise in visibility of articular fragments.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Outcomes