The investigators plan an R33 phase trial in which 120 persons with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) will be randomized (using a 1:1 ratio) to education alone (Ed) on following a carbohydrate restricted diet for T2DM, or this same education content with added mindful eating/Mindfulness-Based Intervention components (Ed+MBI).
The investigators will randomize 120 persons with T2DM in a 1:1 ratio to a nutrition education alone arm (Ed n=60) vs. a nutrition education with mindfulness-based intervention components (Ed+MBI n=60) arm and follow them for 12 months. The interventions will be provided in a weekly group setting, with about 10 to 12 persons per group. Some educational intervention components will be delivered using a smartphone app. After the 12-week initial intervention, the investigators will re-randomize participants using an adaptive intervention design to receive low, medium, or high intensity maintenance training, depending on level of adherence achieved during the initial intervention period. Follow-up assessments will be performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The investigators will address the following specific aims: 1. Test the hypothesis that the Ed+MBI arm will have better dietary adherence than the Ed arm. 2. Test whether our proposed behavioral mechanisms (e.g. decreased eating in response to cravings or difficult emotions) predict dietary adherence. 3. Obtain preliminary assessment of intervention effects on clinical outcomes This is the second phase of a two-phase study. Pilot testing has been completed in the first phase (R61). The focus of the second phase (R33) is on comparing dietary adherence between the Ed only and ED + MBI arms over a 12-month period. This phase will also include employing an adaptive intervention design in the post-treatment phase to test optimization of the maintenance intervention (i.e. assigning maintenance intensity/dose based on how a participant is doing). The maintenance phase intensities will be assessed to provide preliminary data for planning future trials. The primary analysis focus of this phase will be on the comparing the groups formed by the initial randomization to Ed versus Ed + MBI. The investigators will use fingerstick blood ketone measures, which provide an objective measure of whether the target levels of carbohydrate restriction have been attained, as our primary adherence outcome measure. This will be supplemented by 24-hour diet recall measures of carbohydrate consumption. Important secondary outcome measures will include clinical measures such as glycosylated hemoglobin and behavioral measures such as frequency of eating in response to food cravings.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
125
Education for carbohydrate-restricted diet
Mindful eating app use plus group sessions to learn mindfulness
Osher Center for Integrative Medicine
San Francisco, California, United States
Diet Adherence Between Intervention Arms as Measured by % of Ketones >= 0.5 mmol/L
Percent of participant ketone measures \> or = 0.5 mmol/L during trial, by study arm
Time frame: Measures from ketone measure initiation (week 5) to 12 months. Ketones were measured daily over 7 days at 5 study timepoints: 5 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Diet Adherence Between Intervention Arms as Measured by % of Participants in Each Arm With < 50 Grams/Day of Non-fiber Carbohydrate on 24- Hour Diet Recall
Average percent of participant measures with consumption of \< 50 grams/day of non-fiber carbohydrate (from 24-hour diet recall) by arm. Each participant was assigned a % of up to three measures reporting \< 50 grams/day of non-fiber carbohydrate consumption, and this percent was averaged across each arm.
Time frame: Average of three measures, done at 3, 6 and 12 months
Emotion-related Eating
change in emotion-related eating as measured by the Coping subscale of the Palatable Eating Motives Scale (PEMS). The coping subscale ranges from 1 to 5 (based on a mean of 4 items), with higher values indicating more emotion-related eating (the intervention aimed to lower this score--lower scores represent improvement).
Time frame: change from baseline to 12 months
Glycemic Control--HbA1c
Change in Hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 12 months with study arm
Time frame: change from baseline to 12 months
Frequency of Eating in Response to Cravings
Frequency of eating in response to cravings (indulgence) using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), operationalized as the percent of solicited occasions when a participant reported eating in response to cravings (rather than in response merely to hunger). Participants received 18 queries about eating in response to cravings over 3 days. Participants had to respond to at least 9 queries to have adequate data completeness for analysis. Frequency of eating in response to cravings is the proportion (scaled as a percent) of queries that participants responded to with responses that reported eating in response to cravings.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Diet Adherence Between Intervention Arms as Measured by Mean Grams of Non-fiber Carbohydrate Consumed Per Day From 24- Hour Diet Recall
Mean grams of non-fiber carbohydrate consumed per day (from 24-hour diet recall) during trial. We calculated average grams of non-fiber consumed per day across up to three measures during the trial for each participant, and this was averaged across arms.
Time frame: From 3 to 12 months, using measures done at 3, 6, and 12 months
Salzburg Stress Eating Scale
Change in stress-related eating as measured by Salzburg Stress Eating Scale. Range is from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater stress-related eating.
Time frame: change from baseline to 12 months
Weight Change
Body mass in kilograms (kg) from baseline to 12 months
Time frame: change from baseline to 12 month weight data