Efficacy of Augmented Feedback on Lumbar Postural and Movement Control During Physiotherapy and Home Exercise

Zurich University of Applied Sciences20 enrolled

Overview

Exercise therapy is effective in improving pain experience and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and movement/postural control impairments. However, patients often find traditional exercises monotonous and discontinue their execution. Augmented feedback tools (AF) might improve patient adherence and therapy outcomes, but evidence is currently lacking on their effects on movement/postural control. In a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) on a population of patients with NSLBP and movement control impairment, treatment with physiotherapy and home exercise supported by AF is compared to traditional physiotherapy and home exercise treatment without AF (control group). The primary outcomes are defined as lumbar movement control and postural control, measured using an inertial measurement system.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Interventions

An inertial measurement unit (IMU) system is the basis of the augmented feedback (AF) system, where the IMU-system communicates with a laptop using a bluetooth dongle. The corresponding software includes therapeutic games. Movements of the lower back and pelvis by the patient are used to control an avatars movement or the graphical interface in computer exercises. The AF-system provides real-time feedback regarding the patient's performance and helps to rectify incorrect execution of the exercises. The intervention took place at a physiotherapy clinic and in an home environment. In the physiotherapy clinic the patients exercised under the supervision of the physiotherapists. They continued the exercises at home as home exercises.

Control GroupOTHER

Conventional impairment-specific physiotherapy exercises for low back pain patients.The control intervention took place at a physiotherapy clinic and in an home environment. In the physiotherapy clinic the patients exercised under the supervision of the physiotherapists. They continued the exercises at home as home exercises.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 65 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * non specific low back pain for at least four weeks * at least moderate disability (as indicated by an Oswestry disability index (ODI) \> 8% (Mannion et al., 2006)) * low levels of biopsychosocial risk factors (STarT Back Screening tool \> 4 points) (Hill et al., 2011) * at least two positive movement control impairment tests (Luomajoki et al., 2008, Sahrmann, 2002) Exclusion Criteria: * specific low back pain * pain in other areas of the body (e.g. neck, head, thoracic spine or arms) * vertigo or equilibrium disturbances * systemic diseases (e.g. tumours and diabetes) * injuries * surgeries of the legs within the last six months * medication affecting postural control * pregnancy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change from Baseline ratio of the range of motion (ROM) of the stabilized lumbar spine (ROMLS) over the moving body segment, the hip (ROMHip)

Movement control was quantified using the ratio of the range of motion (ROM) of the stabilized lumbar spine (ROMLS) over the moving body segment, the hip (ROMHip) during the movement control test (lumbar spine (LS) over the hip)

Time frame: From Baseline to the completion of nine physiotherapy sessions, which are completed after a maximum of five weeks (Swiss standard prescription)

Changes from Baseline of the mean absolute deviation of lumbar agular displacement

Postural control was quantified using the mean absolute deviation of lumbar angular displacement (MAD)