Primary objective: • To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 mg once daily (OD), compared with placebo, as add-on therapy for PD-related chronic pain Secondary objectives: * Percentage of pain responders * Clinical Global Impression for pain * Patient Global Impression for pain * Reduction in use of pain drugs * Mood * Motor and non-motor symptoms Safety Objectives: • Safety and tolerability
This is a Phase IV, international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients, experiencing motor fluctuations and PD-related chronic pain while on stable doses of levodopa (L-Dopa), to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Safinamide 100 mg Once Daily, as Add-On Therapy. The study consisted of: * A screening period of up to 1 to 2 weeks. * A treatment period of 16 weeks. * A telephone follow-up call at 1 week after the end of treatment. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2:1 to receive either safinamide (50 mg or 100 mg) or matching placebo. At Day 1, eligible subjects entered the treatment period to receive safinamide 50 mg (from Day 1 to Day 7) and then 100 mg (from Day 8 onwards) orally OD. After completion of all baseline assessments, subjects received the first dose of study drug at the study center and, thereafter, study drug was to be taken at home each morning along with their first morning dose of L-DOPA and other (if any) PD medications. On Day 8, the dose of study drug was increased, at home, to 100 mg OD. Each subject received treatment for 16 weeks, with visits at Week 0/Day 1 (baseline) and at Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (or early termination). From Day 1 onwards, subjects recorded the use of as-needed (PRN) medications along with indicating the worst pain they experienced on a daily basis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
94
50 mg, 100 mg
50 mg, 100 mg
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Full Analysis Set
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pain Severity (NRS-11 Scale) - Per Protocol Set
To evaluate the potential efficacy of safinamide 100 (mg od), compared to placebo, as add-on therapy, for change pain severity ("average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days"), as assessed by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of ≥2 Points in Pain Severity at Week 16, Compared to Baseline
Reduction in pain severity (based on the "average worst pain experienced in the last 7 days") of ≥ 2 points was assessed by an 11-point NRS (numerical rating scale), compared to baseline. Based on this scale, 0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Time frame: Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Score for Pain
CGI-C (Clinical Global Impression - Change) score for pain is a seven-point scale that indicates the patient's impression of change for relevant symptoms. It ranges from "substantial improvement" to "substantial worsening": 1. = substantial improvement; 2. = moderate improvement; 3. = minimum improvement; 4. = No change; 5. = Minimum worsening; 6. = moderate worsening; 7. = substantial worsening. of course the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck
Innsbruck, Austria
Institut für Neuroimmunologische und Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
Vienna, Austria
Hopital Gabriel Montpied
Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU de GRENOBLE
Grenoble, France
Hopitaux de La Timone
Marseille, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes
Nîmes, France
Hopital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, France
Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet
Toulouse, France
St. Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin
Berlin, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden
Dresden, Germany
...and 35 more locations
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
The Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Score for Pain at Week 16
The CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression - Severity) score is a seven-point scale which asks the clinician one question: "considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated as follow: 1. = normal, not at all ill; 2. = borderline mentally ill; 3. = mildly ill; 4. = moderately ill; 5. = markedly ill; 6. = severely ill; 7. = among the most severely ill patients. of course the higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score for Pain
The Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) scale is designed to capture the subject's perception of change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, an overall quality of life. These areas are captured using a 7- point scale, indicating: 1. = no change (or condition has got worse); 2. = almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3. = a little better, but not noticeable change; 4. = somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; 5. = moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6. = better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; 7. = a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference. Of course, the higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Subjects With Concomitant Use of Pain Drugs at Different Timepoints
This outcome describes the number of subjects which had concomitant assumption of pain drugs at different timepoints.
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 4, 8 and 16
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Count of Subjects Who Used PRN PD Pain Medication in the 7 Days Preceding Visits
Total count of patients who used PRN (meaning "when necessary") Parkinson's Disease Pain Medications was expressed both in number and in percentage. The analysis of amount of concomitant PRN PD pain medications as reported in the subject diary was summarized: * as the number of subjects who were taking pain medication in the 7 days preceding visits at different timepoints; * in the number of days on which PRN PD pain medication was taken at different timepoints.
Time frame: at Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 16
Amount of PRN PD Pain Medication: Number of Days on Which PRN PD Pain Medication Was Taken at Different Timepoints
The analysis of amount of concomitant PRN PD pain medications as reported in the subject diary was summarized: * as the number of days on which PRN PD pain medication was taken at different timepoints. * as the number of subjects who were taking pain medication in the 7 days preceding visits at different timepoints.
Time frame: At Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was devised to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients through a unique questionnaire which takes 2-5 min to be completed. The questionnaire consists of a total of 14 items: seven items for the anxiety subscale (HADS Anxiety) and seven items for the depression subscale (HADS Depression). HADS Anxiety focus mainly on symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder and HADS Depression is focused on anhedonia, the main symptom of depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for anxiety subscale and the same for depression subscale, where: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case). 11-21 = Abnormal (case) The two subscores are then summed up to obtain a total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The total scale range is 0-42. The higher the score, the worse the anxiety/depression status.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
The Change From Baseline to Week 16 in MDS-UPDRS
Change in the MDS-UPDRS = Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale The MDS-UPDRS is defined by 4 Parts, each composed by a different number of items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 0 to 4); Part I (non-motor experiences of daily living; 13 items) Part II (motor experiences of daily living;13 items) Part III (motor examination; 33 items) Part IV (motor complications; 6 items) The MDS-UPDRS has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 260. The higher the score, the more severe the impairment.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16