This is a Phase 2 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group trial to assess the efficacy and safety of 2 once-daily oral doses of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium), a small molecule inhibitor of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), 30 mg/day and 45 mg/day in the main study, cohort 1 (and 10 mg/day for the patients in the cohort 2 substudy), in patients with RRMS and evidence of active disease. The trial consists of a screening period, a blinded 24-week main treatment period, and an optional initially blinded, then open-label extended treatment period of up to 9.5 years. About 40 centers are planned to participate in Romania, Bulgaria, Ukraine, and Poland; potential additional centers in Hungary and Croatia were not used. The study started with 195 patients in the main group (cohort 1) planned to be randomized 1:1:1 to treatment with 30 mg/day or 45 mg/day IMU-838, or placebo (65 patients each) in the main treatment period. During the extended treatment period, patients were initially re-randomized so that patients previously on placebo were re-randomized 1:1 to treatment with 30 g/day or 45 mg/day IMU-838, all other patients were re-randomized to the same treatment they previously received. With approval of Protocol Version 3.0, a sub-study patient group (cohort 2) has been added with up to 60 patients, randomized to placebo or 10 mg IMU-838 for 24 weeks after which the option is available to continue into the extended treatment period and the recommended dose of 30 mg/day. However, based on discussion between investigator and patient 45 mg/day IMU-838/day may also be used.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
210
* Main treatment period: All patients will receive half the assigned dose during the first 7 days of the main treatment period (one 15 mg tablet IMU-838 daily) and then start taking the full assigned dose from Day 7 onwards (two 15 mg tablets IMU-838 once daily). * Optional extended treatment period (optional): Participants who were re-randomized to a 30 mg/day dose will take the full assigned dose which consists of two 15 mg tablets IMU-838 once daily.
* Main treatment period: All patients will receive half the assigned dose during the first 7 days of the main treatment period (one 22.5 mg tablet per day) and then start taking the full assigned dose from Day 7 onwards (two 22.5 mg tablets once daily). * Optional extended treatment period (optional): Participants who were re-randomized to a 45 mg/day dose will take the full assigned dose of two 22.5 mg tablets IMU-838 once daily.
* Main treatment period (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2): All patients will receive 1 tablet per day during the first 7 days of the main treatment period and then start taking 2 tablets once daily from Day 7 onwards. * Optional extended treatment period: Placebo not applicable as participants were re-randomized to a 30 mg/day dose or a 45 mg/day dose.
* Main treatment period for Cohort 2: All patients will receive half the assigned dose during the first 7 days of the main treatment period (one 5 mg tablet per day) and then start taking the full assigned dose from Day 7 onwards (two 5 mg tablets once daily). * Optional extended treatment period (not applicable to Cohort 2): IMU-838 10 mg/day not applicable.
MHAT Pulse AD, Department of Neurology Diseases
Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
UMHAT "Dr.Georgi Stranski" EAD Pleven Department of Professional Diseases
Pleven, Bulgaria
MHAT "Heart and brain" EAD Pleven Department of Neurology Diseases
Pleven, Bulgaria
UMHAT " Kaspela" EOOD, Department of Neurology Diseases
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
UMHAT "Kanev Ruse", Department of General and Vascular Neurology
Rousse, Bulgaria
Difference Between 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo in the Cumulative Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) MRI Lesions
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. Estimates were adjusted for baseline volume of T2 lesions, MRI field strength (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla), and baseline number of gadolinium enhancing (Gd+) lesions (0, ≥1) using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function. Log transformation of time from first IMP dose to date of last MRI assessment was used as offset term. Mainly due to the differing number of patients with 3.0 Tesla MRI examinations in each treatment arm, the statistical adjustments (to ensure comparabiltiy) for each individual comparison differed and hence the adjusted mean cumulative number of CUA MRI lesions in each arm (e.g. placebo) differed depending on the comparison (45 mg IMU-838 vs placebo, 30 mg IMU-838 vs placebo, or 45 mg vs 30 mg IMU-838).
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo in the Cumulative Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) MRI Lesions
This was the key secondary endpoint (hierarchical testing to primary efficacy). MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. Estimates were adjusted for baseline volume of T2 lesions, MRI field strength (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla), and baseline number of Gd+ lesions (0, ≥1) using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function. Log transformation of time from first IMP dose to date of last MRI assessment was used as offset term. Mainly due to the differing number of patients with 3.0 Tesla MRI examinations in each treatment arm, the statistical adjustments (to ensure comparabiltiy) for each individual comparison differed and hence the adjusted mean cumulative number of CUA MRI lesions in each arm (e.g. placebo) differed depending on the comparison (45 mg IMU-838 vs placebo, 30 mg IMU-838 vs placebo, or 45 mg vs 30 mg IMU-838).
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Difference Between 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and 30 mg/Day IMU-838 in the Cumulative Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) MRI Lesions
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. Estimates were adjusted for baseline volume of T2 lesions, MRI field strength (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla), and baseline number of Gd+ lesions (0, ≥1) using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function. Log transformation of time from first IMP dose to date of last MRI assessment was used as offset term. Mainly due to the differing number of patients with 3.0 Tesla MRI examinations in each treatment arm, the statistical adjustments (to ensure comparabiltiy) for each individual comparison differed and hence the adjusted mean cumulative number of CUA MRI lesions in each arm (e.g. placebo) differed depending on the comparison (45 mg IMU-838 vs placebo, 30 mg IMU-838 vs placebo, or 45 mg vs 30 mg IMU-838).
Time frame: At Week 24
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Mean Number of CUA Lesions Per Patient Per Scan at Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. Estimates were adjusted for MRI field strength (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla) and baseline number of Gd+ lesions (0,≥1) using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Cumulative Number of CUA MRI Lesions up to Weeks 6, 12, and 18
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. Estimates were adjusted for baseline volume of T2 lesions, MRI field strength (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla), and baseline number of Gd+ lesions (0, ≥1) using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function. Log transformation of time from first IMP dose to date of last MRI assessment was used as offset term.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 18)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Volume Changes of T2 Lesions at Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24 Compared to Baseline
The endpoint was removed in the statistical analysis plan \[SAP\], since the content was considered the same as the endpoint "T2-lesion load at Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24 compared to Baseline".
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the T2-lesion Load at Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24 Compared to Baseline
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. The percentage change from Baseline in T2 lesion load was calculated.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the T1-lesion Load at Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24 Compared to Baseline
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. The percentage change from Baseline in T1 lesion load was calculated.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Cumulative Number of New Gd+ Lesions up to Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. Estimates were adjusted for MRI field strength (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla) and baseline number of Gd+ lesions (0, ≥1) using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function. Log transformation of time from first IMP dose to date of last MRI assessment was used as offset term.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Cumulative Number of New T2 Lesions up to Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. Estimates were adjusted for MRI field strength (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla) and baseline number of Gd+ lesions (0, ≥1) using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function. Log transformation of time from first IMP dose to date of last MRI assessment was used as offset term.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Cumulative Number of New T1 Lesions up to Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. Estimates were adjusted for MRI field strength (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla) and baseline number of Gd+ lesions (0, ≥1) using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function. Log transformation of time from first IMP dose to date of last MRI assessment was used as offset term.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Number of Patients Without New Gd+ Lesions Over 24 Weeks
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. The number of patients who did not develop new Gd+ lesions over the 24-week main treatment period was assessed.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Number of Patients Without New or Enlarging T2-weighted Lesions Over 24 Weeks
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. The number of patients who did not develop new or enlarging T2 lesions over the 24-week main treatment period was assessed.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Number of Patients With CUA Lesions at Week 24
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. The number of patients with CUA lesions at Week 24 was assessed.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Number of Patients With Gd+ Lesions at Week 24
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. The number of patients with Gd+ lesions at Week 24 was assessed.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for the Number of Patients With T2 Lesions at Week 24
MRI scans were assessed centrally and adhered to a standardized MRI protocol. The number of patients with T2 lesions at Week 24 was assessed.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Differences Between Individual Treatments and Between the Pooled 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day Groups and Placebo in the Relapse-related Clinical Endpoints: Mean Annualized Relapse Rate (During Main and Extended Treatment Period)
The adjusted mean annualized relapse rate during the main treatment period was calculated. Estimates were adjusted for baseline number of Gd+ lesions (0, ≥1) using a Poisson model with a logarithmic link function. Log transformation of real exposure time of main treatment period was used as offset term. All of the following criteria had to be met for a clinical event to qualify as a relapse: 1. Neurological deficit, either newly appearing or re-appearing, with abnormality specified by both neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding relapse AND neurological abnormality lasting for at least 24 hours 2. Absence of fever or known infection (i.e. temperature \[axillary, oral, or intra-auricular\] ≤37.5ºC) 3. Neurological impairment, defined as either increase in at least one of the functional systems of the EDSS OR increase of the total EDSS score. In both cases, the increase in EDSS had to correlate with the patient's reported symptoms.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Differences Between Individual Treatments and Between the Pooled 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day Groups and Placebo in the Relapse-related Clinical Endpoints: Proportion of Relapse-free Patients up to Week 24 and at Extended Periods Thereafter
The proportion of relapse-free patients up to Week 24 was assessed. Patients with no documented relapse and last assessment of relapse before Week 18 were not included. Patients with no documented relapse up to Week 18 and a missing assessment at Week 24 were regarded as relapse-free patients.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Differences Between Individual Treatments and Between the Pooled 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day Groups and Placebo in the Relapse-related Clinical Endpoints: Time to Relapse at Time of Final Analysis of Main Part
Since only a total of 39 of 209 patients had a relapse up to Week 24, the median time to relapse could not be calculated.
Time frame: Throughout the main treatment period (Day 0 - Week 24)
Differences Between Treatments in Changes of Disease Activity as Measured by the Mean Change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) as Compared to Baseline During the Main and Extended Period (Every 12 Weeks Starting at Week 12)
The EDSS is a widely used and validated instrument evaluating the functional systems of the CNS to describe disease progression and the efficacy of MS therapy. The composite rating system ranges from 0 (normal neurological status) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5-unit increments. An increase in score indicates a worsening.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24
Differences Between Treatments in Changes of Disease Activity as Measured by the Number of Patients With EDSS Progression During the Main and Extended Period (Every 12 Weeks Starting at Week 12, and Cumulatively)
The EDSS is a widely used and validated instrument evaluating the functional systems of the CNS to describe disease progression and the efficacy of MS therapy. The composite rating system ranges from 0 (normal neurological status) to 10 (death due to MS) in 0.5-unit increments. EDSS progression was defined as an increase of the EDSS score compared to Baseline of at least 1.0 point for patients with a baseline EDSS score of 1 to 4.0 or of at least 1.5 points for patients with a baseline EDSS score of 0.
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24
Correlation of MRI-based Assessments With Quartiles of IMU-838 Trough Levels
The cumulative number of CUA MRI lesions up to Week 24 was correlated with quartiles of IMU-838 trough levels at Week 24 of treatment groups IMU-838 30 mg and IMU-838 45 mg.
Time frame: At Week 24
Number of Participants With AEs
The number of patients experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events during the main treatment period was assessed.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Serious AEs
The number of patients experiencing serious adverse events during the main treatment period was assessed.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities (as Assessed by the Investigator)
Abnormal results in laboratory assessments were assessed by the investigator and classified as clinically significant (yes/no). Clinically significantly abnormal values had to be reported as AE, if not already clinically significantly abnormal at Baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to hematological abnormalities and clinical chemistry abnormalities are reported.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest: Red Blood Cell Urine Positive, at Least of Moderate Intensity
The number of patients diagnosed with red blood cell (RBC) urine positive of at least moderate intensity during the main treatment period were assessed. The evaluation of RBC in urine was to be solely based on findings from microscopic examinations of urinary sediment and not from dipstick reading only. Therefore, all conspicuous dipstick readings were to be followed up by a microscopic examination of urinary sediment. All findings of RBC in urine per high-powered field (HPF) were to be listed as urinalysis abnormalities but not as an AE, if assessed by the investigator as not clinically significant. The investigator was also to assess any increased RBC in urine as not clinically significant, if there were more likely alternatives to explain this finding.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest: Hematuria
The number of patients diagnosed with hematuria during the main treatment period were assessed.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest: Retroperitoneal Colicky Pain With Suspected or Confirmed Nephrolithiasis
The number of patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal colicky pain with suspected or confirmed nephrolithiasis during the main treatment period were assessed.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Number of Patients Treated With 30 mg/Day or 45 mg/Day IMU-838 as Compared to Placebo Who Experienced at Least One of the Following AEs:
* Neutropenia * Lymphopenia * Diarrhea * Alopecia * Hemorrhage * Abnormalities in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), and total bilirubin with both elevations ˃1.5 x ULN and ≥35% elevated compared to Baseline
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG): Heart Rate
The 12-lead ECG was recorded in supine position after at least 5 minutes at rest using the local standard ECG machine. The ECG was analyzed qualitatively (normal or abnormal, if abnormal clinically significant \[yes/no\]). The heart rate, PQ-, QRS-, and QT intervals, as well as the heart rate-corrected QTc interval (according to Bazett's formula) were determined. All procedures were done according to local practice.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG): PQ-interval
The 12-lead ECG was recorded in supine position after at least 5 minutes at rest using the local standard ECG machine. The ECG was analyzed qualitatively (normal or abnormal, if abnormal clinically significant \[yes/no\]). The heart rate, PQ-, QRS-, and QT intervals, as well as the heart rate-corrected QTc interval (according to Bazett's formula) were determined. All procedures were done according to local practice.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG): QRS-interval
The 12-lead ECG was recorded in supine position after at least 5 minutes at rest using the local standard ECG machine. The ECG was analyzed qualitatively (normal or abnormal, if abnormal clinically significant \[yes/no\]). The heart rate, PQ-, QRS-, and QT intervals, as well as the heart rate-corrected QTc interval (according to Bazett's formula) were determined. All procedures were done according to local practice.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG): QT-interval
The 12-lead ECG was recorded in supine position after at least 5 minutes at rest using the local standard ECG machine. The ECG was analyzed qualitatively (normal or abnormal, if abnormal clinically significant \[yes/no\]). The heart rate, PQ-, QRS-, and QT intervals, as well as the heart rate-corrected QTc interval (according to Bazett's formula) were determined. All procedures were done according to local practice.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG): Heart Rate-corrected QTc Interval (According to Bazett's Formula)
The 12-lead ECG was recorded in supine position after at least 5 minutes at rest using the local standard ECG machine. The ECG was analyzed qualitatively (normal or abnormal, if abnormal clinically significant \[yes/no\]). The heart rate, PQ-, QRS-, and QT intervals, as well as the heart rate-corrected QTc interval (according to Bazett's formula) were determined. All procedures were done according to local practice.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Physical Examination
Physical examinations covered the following body systems: general appearance, skin, neck (including thyroid), throat, lungs, heart, abdomen, back, lymph nodes, extremities, vascular, neurological systems, and, if applicable, others. Any new clinically significant finding compared to Screening Visit 1 had to be documented as AE. Any clinically significant finding at Screening Visit 1 had to be documented in the medical history section of the eCRF. Patients with clinically significant findings in the physical examination post Day 0 are reported.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Vital Signs: Height
Height in centimeters was recorded without shoes. Changes in vital signs judged by the investigator as clinically significant were to be reported as an AE.
Time frame: at Screening
Vital Signs: Weight (Absolute Change From Baseline at Week 24)
Weight in kilograms was recorded without shoes. Changes in vital signs judged by the investigator as clinically significant were to be reported as an AE.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Vital Signs: Body Temperature (ºC) (Absolute Change From Baseline at Week 24)
Changes in vital signs judged by the investigator as clinically significant were to be reported as an AE.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate (Absolute Change From Baseline at Week 24)
Changes in vital signs judged by the investigator as clinically significant were to be reported as an AE.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Vital Signs: Pulse Rates (Absolute Change From Baseline at Week 24)
Pulse had to be measured with the patient in a seated position, after at least 5 minutes at rest. Changes in vital signs judged by the investigator as clinically significant were to be reported as an AE.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures (Absolute Change From Baseline at Week 24)
Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) had to be measured with the patient in a seated position, after at least 5 minutes at rest. Changes in vital signs judged by the investigator as clinically significant were to be reported as an AE.
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Micro Ribonucleic Acid (miR)-122 Expression
The fold change in miR-122 from pre dose to 4 hours post dose was assessed.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 4 hours after first dose
Presence of John Cunningham Virus (JCV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) in Urine in Patients With Detectable JCV-DNA in Urine
The presence of JCV-DNA in urine in patients with detectable JCV-DNA in urine at Screening Visit 1, at Week 24, and at end-of-study (EoS) was determined.
Time frame: At Screening Visit 1, at Week 24, and at EoS visit (EoS visit 30 days (+14 days) after last IMP intake)
Time to Treatment Discontinuation for Any Reason
The time to treatment discontinuation up to Week 24 for any reason was determined.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Rate of Treatment Discontinuations up to Week 24
The discontinuation rate during the main treatment period was assessed.
Time frame: at Week 24
Population Pharmacokinetics: Minimum IMU-838 Plasma Concentration Over the Dosing Interval (Cmin)
One single measurement between 3 and 10 hours post-dose. Population pharmacokinetics have not been reported yet.
Time frame: At Week 6 (3-10 hours post-dose)
Population Pharmacokinetics: Maximum IMU-838 Plasma Concentration Over the Dosing Interval (Cmax)
One single measurement between 3 and 10 hours post-dose. Population pharmacokinetics have not been reported yet.
Time frame: At Week 6 (3-10 hours post-dose)
Population Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the IMU-838 Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-τ)
One single measurement between 3 and 10 hours post-dose. Population pharmacokinetics have not been reported yet.
Time frame: At Week 6 (3-10 hours post-dose)
Population Pharmacokinetics: IMU-838 Apparent Clearance Following Oral Dosing (CL/F)
One single measurement between 3 and 10 hours post-dose. Population pharmacokinetics have not been reported yet.
Time frame: At Week 6 (3-10 hours post-dose)
Population Pharmacokinetics: IMU-838 Apparent Volume of Distribution (V/F)
One single measurement between 3 and 10 hours post-dose. Population pharmacokinetics have not been reported yet.
Time frame: At Week 6 (3-10 hours post-dose)
Plasma Trough Levels of IMU-838
Plasma trough levels of IMU-838 were assessed at Day 7 and at Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24.
Time frame: At Day 7 and Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24
Changes From Baseline in Th1 Lymphocyte Subset as Measured by Flow Cytometry
Changes from Baseline in lymphocyte subsets were listed only; no descriptive statistics by treatment arm were calculated.
Time frame: At Weeks 6 and 24 (in selected Biomarker Centers only)
Changes From Baseline in Th17 Lymphocyte Subset as Measured by Flow Cytometry
Changes from Baseline in lymphocyte subsets were listed only; no descriptive statistics by treatment arm were calculated.
Time frame: At Weeks 6 and 24 (in selected Biomarker Centers only)
Changes From Baseline in Treg Lymphocyte Subset as Measured by Flow Cytometry
Changes from Baseline in lymphocyte subsets were listed only; no descriptive statistics by treatment arm were calculated.
Time frame: At Weeks 6 and 24 (in selected Biomarker Centers only)
Changes From Baseline in Serum Neurofilament
The percentage change from Baseline in serum neurofilament was calculated.
Time frame: At Week 6 and Week 24
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
The TSQM is a reliable and valid instrument to assess patients' satisfaction with medication comprising 14 items across 4 domains: side effects, performance, convenience and global satisfaction. All items have 5 to 7 possible answers, except for item 4 (2 answers). Item scores for each domain are summed and transformed to a scale from 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 100 (extremely satisfied).
Time frame: assessed at 6 weeks, 24 weeks, and end of study visit (EoS visit 30 days [+14 days] after last IMP intake), reported at Week 6 and Week 24
Difference Between 30 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, 45 mg/Day IMU-838 and Placebo, and 30 mg/Day and 45 mg/Day IMU-838 for Brain Atrophy.
This endpoint was added in statistical analysis plan Version 2.0. Results of the brain atrophy analysis included biologically implausible changes (including changes of more than 1% over 24 weeks) in all treatment groups. Hence, the brain volume changes were considered technically inadequate for any conclusions of a treatment effect of IMU-838 versus placebo.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, and Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
MHATNP "Sveti Naum" EAD, Neurology Clinic for Movement Disorders, First Department of Neurology Diseases
Sofia, Bulgaria
MHATNPsy "Sveti Naum" EAD, Intensive Therapy Clinic Of Neurology Diseases
Sofia, Bulgaria
DCC "Neoclinic" EAD, Cabinet Neurology Diseases
Sofia, Bulgaria
UMHAT "Alexandrovska" EAD, Clinic of Neurology Diseases, Department of Inherited Degenerative and Immunoinflamatori Diseases at Peripheral Nervous System
Sofia, Bulgaria
UMHAT "Sveti Ivan Rilski" EAD Sofia Clinic of Neurological Diseases
Sofia, Bulgaria
...and 28 more locations