Task-specific repetitive training, an usual care in occupational therapy practice, and robotic-aided rehabilitation with bilateral practice to improve limb's movement control has been popularised; however the difference in treatment effects between this two therapeutic strategies has been rarely described. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted therapy with bilateral practice (RTBP) and usual care on task and motor performance for chronic stroke patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
43
40-minute robotic-assisted therapy with bilateral practice program for wrist and forearm repetitive movement training was performed during each session.
40 -minute unilateral task-specific training using various tasks: picks up beans with spoon, pouring water from one glass to another glass, opening and closing a drawer, drinking from a mug, and wiping the table were chosen for facilitating multitude of upper extremity functions. Three tasks per session were chosen for various specific components of hand-arm function training.
10-minute sensorimotor stimulation program with repetitive range of motion exercises of upper extremity, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and Rood approach
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Tainan, Taiwan
Change in the result of Motor Activity Log
Motor activity log is a structured interview with testing sensitivity used to examine how much (amount of use, AOU) and how well (quality of movement, QOM) the subject uses their more-affected arm. For the 30 items MAL, each item is scored on a 0-5-ordinal scale.
Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (4 weeks) and follow-up (16 weeks) assessments
Change in the result of Fugl-Meyer assessment for UE motor function
Each item is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (2 points for the detail being performed completely, 1 point for the detail being performed partially, and 0 for the detail not being performed). The maximum motor performance score is 66 points for the upper extremity.completely, 1 point for the detail being performed partially, and 0 for the detail not being performed). The maximum motor performance score is 66 points for the upper extremity.
Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (4 weeks) and follow-up (16 weeks) assessments
Change in root mean square (RMS) value and the median frequency of the power spectrum of each detected motor unit action potential during maximum voluntary contraction
Power and frequency function of Surface Electromyogram signals are reliable parameter to evaluate motor behavior of stroke survivors. The location sEMG electrodes were placed on the muscle belly of the anterior deltoid, flexor carpi radialis and extensor carpi radialis of the affected forearm.
Time frame: Baseline, endpoint (4 weeks) and follow-up (16 weeks) assessments
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.