This study examines the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination as compared to MRI findings
When patients get musculoskeletal pain and seek care, the healthcare professional performs a detailed clinical examination to determine a diagnosis and determine a plan of care which often includes imaging. There are only a few studies that have looked at the accuracy of the clinical examination in a primary care setting, most studies having been performed in a specialty practice treating Orthopedic or Sports injuries. In these practices, surgery has become and remains the gold standard. However, in primary care, often imaging like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become the the criterion standard. This double blind study will compare the diagnosis reached by clinical exam to the results found on MRI. In addition, the examining clinician will report their recommended plan of care after the examination.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
25
Thorough examination including history, screening, motion testing, strength testing, special testing
Low field MRI .25 Tesla
High Point University
High Point, North Carolina, United States
likelihood ratios
combination of sensitivity
Time frame: 5 years
Area under the curve
measure of accuracy of the clinical exam
Time frame: 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.