The early placement of an intravenous (iv) line in children anesthetized with halothane has been shown safe and acceptable compared with later placement. However, there's not well known with sevoflurane use (2). The aim of the investigator's study is to determine whether one should make iv attempts during the early induction period (at 60seconds) or lately (90 or 120 s) and waiting until the child receives additional sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia
the investigators conducted a prospective randomized study, after obtaining Institutional review board approval, which didn't require written parental consent. Children age 1-12 years, undergoing elective general anesthesia via an inhalation induction were randomized to one of three groups of 30 patients each one, for iv placement, either 60s (group E), 90 or 120 s (group L) following loss of lid reflex. Movement on iv placement and incidence of laryngospasm were determined. Difficulty with iv placement was also recorded. Statistical analysis included contingency testing, ANOVA, and non parametric testing. A P-value \<0.05 was considered significant.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
90
The aim of our study is to determine whether one should make intravenous attempts placement during the early induction period (at 60seconds) or lately (90 or 120 s) and waiting until the child receives additional sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia.
Movement on iv placement
Number of children who presented movement on iv placement
Time frame: In the first 5 min after the anesthesic induction with sevoflurane
laryngospasm
The incidence of laryngospasm
Time frame: Time From Intravenous Cannulation to patient extubation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.