This study's primary objective is to perform a randomized controlled pilot study to assess the feasibility of using EEG-based neurofeedback to reduce the severity of treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations ('hearing voices') in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Patients will be randomized to receive either EEG-based neurofeedback or treatment-as-usual.
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are experienced by up to 80% of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, where they can cause significant occupational and social impairment. Current treatments are incompletely effective. Around 25-30% of AVH are refractory to antipsychotic drugs, and cognitive behavioural therapy only shows a small-medium effect size. Initially promising studies of neurostimulation have shown smaller effect sizes as better controlled trials have been conducted. There is hence the need for innovative new treatments. One potential option is neurofeedback training. The primary objective of study is to perform a randomized, controlled, rater-blinded pilot trial (n=40) of EEG neurofeedback for AVH in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, to assess trial process, which will then inform a future definitive trial. The secondary objective is to calculate a 95% confidence interval that will allow interpretation of statistical difference between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual groups to assess neurofeedback for reducing auditory verbal hallucinations. Participants will be randomly allocated to either a neurofeedback (plus treatment-as-usual) or treatment-as-usual alone condition. Neurofeedback will employ Z-score based LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography). After a baseline assessment, twenty sessions of personalized neurofeedback training will be delivered over a period of approximately four months. This is the first registered trial of EEG neurofeedback for hallucinations. The primary focus of the pilot trial is on feasibility. However, a 95% confidence interval will be determined for the difference on PSYRATS-AH and AHRS scores between neurofeedback and treatment-as-usual to help inform a future definitive trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
4
Twenty sessions of neurofeedback training using LORETA in combination with z-scores.
Treatment-as-usual
Tallaght University Hospital / St. James' Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
Recruitment rate
We will measure how many patients were recruited into the trial per calendar month of active recruitment.
Time frame: 24 months
Willingness of participants to be randomised.
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered in the trial but refused randomisation.
Time frame: 24 months
Willingness of participants to complete assessments
We will measure the proportion of participants who were entered into the trial and completed all baseline assessment measures.
Time frame: 24 months
Drop-out rate: LORETA condition
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the neurofeedback condition, and dropped out of the study.
Time frame: 24 months
Success of blinding of raters
We will measure the proportion of blind raters who were correctly able to guess the group allocation of participants, and assess if this was greater than chance.
Time frame: 24 months
Rates of adverse psychiatric events
We will assess the proportion of patients entered into the trial who experienced adverse psychiatric events reported.
Time frame: 24 months
Drop-out rate: Controls
We will measure the proportion of patients who were entered into the trial, randomised to the control condition, and dropped out of the study.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH)
The Auditory Hallucination Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999) is an 11-item measure of the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. Total scores can range from 0 to 44 with higher scores indicating greater severity of auditory verbal hallucinations. The PSYRATS-AH has been found to have a four-factor structure (Woodward et al., 2014). These are Emotion (range 0-20), Physical (range 0-12), Cognitive (range 0-8) and Loudness (range 0-4). Higher scores on each of these subscales represents more severe auditory verbal hallucinations. We will assess between group differences in both the total and four factor scores of the PSYRATS-AH at end of therapy.
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS)
The Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS; Hoffman et al., 2003) is a seven-item structured clinical interview, which assesses the severity of auditory verbal hallucinations in the past week. Its items assess frequency, reality, loudness, number, length, attentional salience (how demanding of attention the voice is) and distress level. Items are rated on unique scales. Total scores on this measure can range from 0 - 41 . Higher scores represent more severe auditory verbal hallucinations.
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings (PSYRATS-D).
Delusions will be assessed by the Delusions Subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Ratings Scale (PSYRATS-D; Haddock et al., 1999). This is a 6-item structured clinical interview. Total scores can range from 0-24, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. It has been found to have two factors (Woodward et al., 2014), namely Distress (distress amount, distress intensity) and Frequency (preoccupation amount, preoccupation duration, conviction, disruption). Total scores on these factors can range from 0-8 and 0-16 respectively, with higher scores representing more severe delusions. Both total PSYRATS-D and factor scores will be employed.
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS; Zigmund \& Snaith, 1983) is a 16-item self-report measure of both anxiety and depression. Eight items assess depression and eight items assess anxiety. Depression scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of depression. Anxiety scores can range from 0-24 with higher scores representing higher levels of anxiety.
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire
Quality of life will be assessed by the short-form of the self-report Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ; Endicott et al., 1993). Total scores on 16-item measure can range from 14 to 70, with higher scores representing greater quality of life.
Time frame: End of intervention (~4 months)