Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions

Cairo University45 enrolled

Overview

With limited evidence-based information in literature about using self-adhering flowable composite in conservative class V restorations, it was found beneficial to evaluate the newly introduced material using a randomized controlled clinical trial to test the null hypothesis that moist bonding self-adhering flowable composite with and without adhesive system will have the same clinical performance as conventional flowable composite in cervical caries lesions.

flowable composite is considered a gold standard in class V restorations due to its resilient character the prevents its dislodgement in this area. self-adhering flowable composite would simplify the clinical steps and claims to improve the adhesion.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Dental Restoration Failure

Interventions

flowable resin compositeOTHER

gold standard

self adhering flowableOTHER

moist bonding self adhering flowable composite

self adhering flowable with adhesiveOTHER

moist bonding self adhering flowable composite with the aid of an adhesive system.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 16 YearsMax age: 55 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * patients with anterior cervical carious lesions. * Pulp asymptomatic vital carious anterior teeth. * Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy. * Disabilities. * Systemic disease or severe medical complications. * Deep extensive carious cavities that may lead to the fracture of the tooth or pulpal affection. * Teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis. * Heavy smokers.

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University

Giza, Egypt

RECRUITING

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in the clinical performance using Fédération Dentaire Internationale' (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of the direct restoration. (FDI) criteria includes

Biological properties (Postoperative hypersensitivity \& tooth vitality, Recurrence of caries, erosion \& abfraction,Tooth integrity (enamel cracks or tooth fractures),Periodontal response (compared to a reference tooth),Adjacent mucosa, Oral \& general health). Esthetic properties (Surface luster, Staining (surface \&margin),Color match \& translucency \& Esthetic anatomical form). Functional properties (Fracture or material retention, Marginal integrity, Occlusal contour \&wear (quantitatively \& qualitatively), Proximal anatomical form(contact point \&contour), Radiographic examination(when applicable) \&Patient's view For each criteria one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory \& poor). Subscales will not be combined

Time frame: Change from the baseline at 6 months and12 months]

Central Contacts

mona mounir, msc

CONTACT

01001171585 monamounir1987@gmail.com

hussein gomaa, PhD

CONTACT

drgomaadent@hotmail.com

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.