This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in participants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and complete radiological response after surgical resection or local ablation. The primary hypotheses of this study are that adjuvant pembrolizumab is superior to placebo with respect to: 1) recurrence-free survival (RFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR); and 2) overall survival (OS).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
959
IV infusion of Pembrolizumab 200 mg.
IV infusion of 0.9% normal saline.
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center ( Site 0026)
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
The University of Arizona Cancer Center - North Campus ( Site 0039)
Tucson, Arizona, United States
City of Hope Medical Center ( Site 0027)
Duarte, California, United States
Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven ( Site 0042)
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Regional Cancer Center ( Site 0054)
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS)
RFS was defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of disease recurrence (local, regional, or distant) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) or by pathology consistent with HCC if required per the site's standard of care, or death due to any cause (both cancer and non-cancer causes of death), whichever occurred first. RFS was reported for each arm.
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS was reported for each arm.
Time frame: Up to approximately 69 months
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with the use of study therapy, regardless of whether or not a causal relationship with the study therapy was determined. The number of participants who experienced an AE were reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with the use of study therapy, regardless of whether or not a causal relationship with the study therapy was determined. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE were reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 23 months
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Combined Global Health Status (GHS) / Quality of Life (QoL) Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participants responded to the questions regarding Global Health Status (GHS; "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and Quality of Life ("How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?") are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 2 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 29) and QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 30) combined score was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality of life questionnaire. Participants responded to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1-5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicated better physical functioning. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) combined score was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality of life questionnaire. The role functioning score was based on participant responses to questions scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score was computed by averaging the raw scores of Items 6 and 7 and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicated better role functioning. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning (Items 6 and 7) combined score was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Module (EORTC QLQ-HCC18) Abdominal Swelling Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-HCC18 is an HCC-specific questionnaire, administered in addition to the EORTC QLQ-C30. The abdominal swelling scale score was based on participant responses to questions scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms/problems. Change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 abdominal swelling scale score was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Fatigue Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-HCC18 is an HCC-specific questionnaire, administered in addition to the EORTC QLQ-C30. The fatigue scale score was based on participant responses to questions scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score was computed by averaging the raw scores of the items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms/problems. Change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 fatigue scale score was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Pain Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-HCC18 is an HCC-specific questionnaire, administered in addition to the EORTC QLQ-C30. The pain scale score was based on participant responses to questions scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score was computed by averaging the raw scores of the items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms/problems. Change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 pain scale score was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score on the European Quality of Life (EuroQoL)-5 Dimensions, 5-level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health Utility Score
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The VAS is a component of the EQ-5D-5L that asked participants to rate their overall health on a vertical visual analogue scale, with the scale's ends labelled 'The best health you can imagine' (equivalent to a score of 0) and 'The worst health you can imagine' (equivalent to a score of 100).
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Combined GHS / QoL Scale Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess QoL of cancer patients. Participants responded to questions on GHS ("How would you rate your overall health during the past week?") and QoL ("How would you rate your overall QoL during the past week?") were scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). The combined score of GHS (Item 29) and QoL (Item 30) was computed by averaging raw scores of the 2 items and applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in GHS-QoL combined score. A longer TTD indicated a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
TTD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participants responded to 5 questions about their physical functioning (Items 1 to 5) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of items 1 to 5 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the 5 items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in physical functioning (Items 1 to 5). A longer TTD indicated a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
TTD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning Scale Score
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall QoL of cancer patients. Participants responded to questions about their role functioning (Items 6 and 7) are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score of Items 6 and 7 was computed by averaging the raw scores of the items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. A higher score indicated a better outcome. TTD was defined as the time from baseline to first onset of ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from baseline in physical functioning (Items 6 and 7). A longer TTD indicated a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
TTD in the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Abdominal Swelling Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-HCC18 is an HCC-specific questionnaire, administered in addition to the EORTC QLQ-C30. The abdominal swelling scale score was based on participant responses to questions scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms/problems. The TTD in EORTC QLQ-HCC18 abdominal swelling scale score was reported, defined as the time to first onset of a ≥10 point decrease from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
TTD in the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Fatigue Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-HCC18 is an HCC-specific questionnaire, administered in addition to the EORTC QLQ-C30. The fatigue scale score was based on participant responses to questions scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score was computed by averaging the raw scores of the items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms/problems. The TTD in EORTC QLQ-HCC18 fatigue scale score was reported, defined as the time to first onset of a ≥10 point decrease from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
TTD in the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Pain Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-HCC18 is an HCC-specific questionnaire, administered in addition to the EORTC QLQ-C30. The pain scale score was based on participant responses to questions scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). The combined score was computed by averaging the raw scores of the items and then applying a linear transformation to standardize the average score, so that the combined scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicated more severe symptoms/problems. The TTD in EORTC QLQ-HCC18 pain scale score was reported, defined as the time to first onset of a ≥10 point decrease from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 120 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Indiana University Simon Cancer Center ( Site 0075)
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Iowa ( Site 0067)
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
James Graham Brown Cancer Center ( Site 0088)
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
University of Louisville ( Site 0059)
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
University Medical Center New Orleans ( Site 0014)
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
...and 239 more locations