The aims of this proposal are to compare the effects of 4-h versus 6-h time restricted feeding (TRF) on body weight and metabolic disease risk factors in adults with obesity. To test the study objectives, a 10-week randomized, controlled, parallel-arm trial, divided into 2 consecutive periods: (1) 2-week baseline period; and (2) 8-week TRF weight loss period, will be implemented. Obese subjects will be randomized to 1 of 3 groups: (1) 4-h TRF, (2) 6-h TRF, or a no-intervention control group. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial to compare 4-h versus 6-h TRF.
Modest weight loss of 5-10% is sufficient to reduce metabolic disease risk in obese individuals. The first line of therapy prescribed for weight loss is daily calorie restriction (CR; 25% restriction every day). However, adherence to CR greatly diminishes after 4-6 weeks, due to subject frustration with constantly having to count calories and never being able to eat freely. In light of these issues with CR, another approach that limits timing of food intake, instead of number of calories consumed, has been developed. This strategy is termed time restricted feeding (TRF), and involves confining the period of food intake to 8 h/d (10 am to 6 pm) without calorie counting. Preliminary findings of 8-h TRF demonstrate modest weight loss and blood pressure reductions after 12 weeks. What remains unknown however, is whether shorter feeding windows during TRF (such as 4-h or 6-h feeding windows) can produce even greater weight loss in obese adults. Also of interest, is the impact of these shorter feeding windows on metabolic disease risk indicators (such as plasma lipids, blood pressure, and insulin resistance, inflammation and oxidative stress). Accordingly, the aims of this proposal are: AIM 1: To compare the effects of 4-h versus 6-h time restricted feeding (TRF) on body weight in adults with obesity; AIM 2: To compare the effects of 4-h versus 6-h TRF on metabolic disease risk factors in adults with obesity. To test the study objectives, a 10-week randomized, controlled, parallel-arm trial, divided into 2 consecutive periods: (1) 2-week baseline period; and (2) 8-week TRF weight loss period, will be implemented. Obese subjects will be randomized to 1 of 3 groups: (1) 4-h TRF, (2) 6-h TRF, or a no-intervention control group. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial to compare 4-h versus 6-h TRF on body weight and metabolic disease risk markers.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
82
TRF subjects will consume food ad libitum during the feeding window (4-h or 6-h window), and refrain from eating during the fasting window (20-h or 18-h window)
University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Change from baseline to week 8 in body weight
Measured by an electronic scale
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in body composition
Measured by DXA
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in Insulin resistance
Measured as HOMA-IR
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in Fasting glucose
Measured with a hexokinase reagent kit
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in Fasting insulin
Measured as total immunoreactive insulin
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in Blood pressure
Measured by a blood pressure cuff
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in adverse events
Measured by questionnaire
Time frame: Measured weekly from baseline to week 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in plasma lipids
Measured by outside lab (Medstart, IN)
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in heart rate
Measured by a blood pressure cuff
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in inflammatory markers (TNF-a, IL-6)
Measured by ELISA
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in oxidative stress (8-isoprostane)
Measured by ELISA
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in calorie and macronutrient intake
Measured by food record
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in physical activity (steps/d)
Measured by activity monitor
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in diet adherence
Measured by a questionnaire
Time frame: Measured weekly from baseline to week 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in sleep quality
Measured by a questionnaire
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in insomnia severity
Measured by a questionnaire
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in risk of sleep apnea
Measured by a questionnaire
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
Change from baseline to week 8 in sex steroid levels (estrogen, androgens, sex hormone binding globulin)
Measured by a ELISA
Time frame: Measured at week 1 and 8
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.