The purpose of the study is to investigate the degree of improvement in appearance after treatment with different hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. Product selection is based on Investigator assessment of participant tissue coverage and main treatment goal (volumizing, lifting or contouring).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
90
Hyaluronic based filler
Hyaluronic based filler
Hyaluronic based filler
Galderma Research Site
Munich, Germany
Galderma Research Site
Palermo, Italy
Galderma Research Site
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Percentage of Participants With Aesthetic Improvement of Midface
A blinded evaluator assesses the improvement compared to baseline (pre-treatment) using a 5-graded scale; Worse, No change, Improved, Much improved or Very much improved. Aesthetic improvement of midface is defined as those participants assessed as Improved, Much improved or Very much improved.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Improved Midface Volume
A blinded evaluator assessed the fullness of the midface by using a 4-graded scale where 1= fairly full and 4= substantial loss of fullness. Improved midface volume was defined as at least a 1-grade decrease from baseline.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Percentage of Participants Assessed as Having Natural Treatment Results
Blinded evaluator assessed participants by answering Strongly agree/Agree/Neither agree nor disagree/Disagree/Strongly disagree to the question "Are the subject's treatment results natural looking?". Having natural treatment results is defined as being assessed with answers Strongly agree or Agree.
Time frame: 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.