CRS remains a common challenging clinical entity due to variable phenotypes with different underlying mechanisms that lead to persistence or recurrence polyps. The eosinophils dominant inflammation was considered as a major pathological hallmark and challenges of CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Differentiate surgical approaches towards eosinophilic CRSwNP (eCRSwNP) should be addressed on the basis of the inflammatory endotypes. eCRSwNP has been recognized as the most easily relapsed type of CRS, and the combination of asthma increases the difficulty of treatment. Till now there is no recognized surgical strategy for eCRSwNP with asthma.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
27
The procedure of RESS was completed as described in "full-house FESS (FHF)" approach, involving complete removal of all nasal polyps along with a full maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, wide sphenoidotomy, and a Draf 2A frontal sinusotomy. Moreover the bilateral inferior two-thirds of MTs were meanwhile resected. The technique for the Draf 3 frontal drillout procedure was described in detail in previous publications with resection of the superior nasal septum, central frontal sinus floor, and frontal beak region, resulting in a widely patent, oval-shaped, common frontal sinus neo-ostium
The procedure of RESS was completed as described in "full-house FESS (FHF)" approach, involving complete removal of all nasal polyps along with a full maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, wide sphenoidotomy, and a Draf 2A frontal sinusotomy. Moreover the bilateral inferior two-thirds of MTs were meanwhile resected
FESS was performed by Messerklinger technique with middle turbinate preservation
recurrence
Recurrence was defined if the patient had symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis after surgery, and nasal endoscopy found nasal polyps recurrence, obvious edema of mucosa, or purulent secretion, and above of symptoms or physical signs existed, which can't be alleviated by maximum medicine treatment at least 1 month
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
recurrence
Recurrence was defined if the patient had symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis after surgery, and nasal endoscopy found nasal polyps recurrence, obvious edema of mucosa, or purulent secretion, and above of symptoms or physical signs existed, which can't be alleviated by maximum medicine treatment at least 1 month
Time frame: 3 years after surgery
recurrence
Recurrence was defined if the patient had symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis after surgery, and nasal endoscopy found nasal polyps recurrence, obvious edema of mucosa, or purulent secretion, and above of symptoms or physical signs existed, which can't be alleviated by maximum medicine treatment at least 1 month
Time frame: 5 years after surgery
Visual analogue scale of 4 major clinical symptoms
Subjective symptoms were scored on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10 as previously described, with 0 being no complaints whatsoever and 10 being the worst imaginable. Four major symptoms include nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, loss of smell, and headache and/or facial pain.
Time frame: at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery
Sinus-specific quality of life (QoL)
Sinus-specific quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22)
Time frame: at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery
Postoperatively endoscopic results
Postoperatively endoscopic results were scored according to the Lund-Kennedy system, with the assessment of edema, nasal discharge, scarring, and crusting
Time frame: at baseline, and 1 year, 3years, 5 years after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.