Definity (perflutren lipid microspheres, Lantheus Medical Imaging) is an ultrasound contrast indicated for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to opacify the left ventricular chamber and to improve the delineation of the left ventricular endocardial border. MVT-100 (the investigational pharmaceutical) is similar to Definity, with the exception of the removal of one lipid in the lipid blend and substitution of another lipid. This study is intended to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MVT-100 using a single ascending dose design in healthy volunteers. Patients are randomized to receive either MVT-100 or Definity and undergo echocardiograms after receiving either MVT-100 or Definity via bolus or IV infusion administration. The primary endpoints evaluated are safety and endocardial border delineation.
Ultrasound is one of the most common imaging examinations and has advantages of absence of ionizing radiation, portability and relatively low cost. Ultrasound contrast agents are used to improve the accuracy of ultrasound and Definity (perflutren) is the world's leading ultrasound contrast agent but perflutren has to be refrigerated and has a side effect of back pain. The investigators have developed a new, improved perflutren, MVT-100, with potential for room temperature storage. Ultrasound contrast agents are used to increase the backscatter (signal intensity of blood vessels and tissues to improve diagnostic accuracy) of ultrasound imaging. In the US ultrasound contrast agents are FDA approved for echocardiography to improve endomyocardial border definition. MVT-100 reflects the ultrasound to provide strong back-scattering. MVT-100 microbubbles resonate with ultrasound to provide strong harmonic signals. MVT-100 microbubbles will cavitate with higher levels of ultrasound and cavitation may be stable or inertial depending upon acoustic parameters and other factors. The study is a multi centre ascending dose comparison of Definity and MVT-100 for use in echocardiography and will be performed in a sample of healthy volunteers who are randomized to receive either Definity or MVT-100. This trial will assess safety and evaluate the following imaging metrics: * Determine the optimal dose of MVT-100 by comparing MVT-100 vs Definity in the change from baseline of quantitative left ventricular opacification * Evaluation of qualitative left ventricular opacification (LVO) * Evaluation of endocardial border delineation * Evaluation of endocardial border length * Evaluation of duration of useful contrast
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
16
Images will be recorded in parasternal long, short axis, apical four, two, and three chamber views according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) 17 segment model. Each assessment will include one round of low MI imaging (\<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (\<0.2) in each of the pre-specified windows according to the 2014 ASE Sonographer Guidelines. A baseline echocardiogram will be performed prior to the administration of DEFINITY® or MVT-100. Assessments will be made three times, once from 0 - 1 ½ minutes following injection, once between 1 ½ minutes to 3 minutes following IV injection and once from 3 - 4 ½ minutes following IV injection. Assessments at each time point will include one round of low MI imaging (\<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (\<0.2). Each round will include the views in the following order: parasternal long, parasternal short, apical 4, apical 2 and apical 3.
After randomization, MVT-100, the experimental drug, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained.
After randomization, Definity, the active comparator, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained.
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
QT Interval
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time frame: Day of study
Blood Pressure
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time frame: Day of study
Heart Rate
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time frame: Day of study
Oxygen Saturation
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time frame: Day of study
Other Symptoms
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®)
Time frame: Day of study
Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO)
The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®)
Time frame: Day of Study
Cardiac Segment Visualization
The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®)
Time frame: Day of Study
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.