Pilot Interventional study with minimal risks and constraints, prospective, monocentric. Safety and Efficacity evaluation of a Novel Medical Device.
Upper limb's phantom pain, due to amputation or to injury of the brachial plexus are possibly due to maladaptive CNS (central nervous system facility) plasticity and thus could be decreased by retraining the sensorimotor cortex using Mental Motor Imaging guided through a novel BCI-RV feedback system : "Ghost". The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of this BCI pain treatment developed by our team.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
7
up to 3 test sessions (D-30) to eliminate BCI illiteracy, then 10 rehabilitation sessions of 90 minutes (D1-D5 and D8-D12) - Session content : Guided training - Control of an avatar (VR, first person view) of the affected limb by motor mental imagery decoded by a brain computer interface.
Nantes Uh
Nantes, France
Efficacy of BCI intervention on mean daily pain
Determination by curve fitting technique (regression analysis) of the peak effect and calculation of the rate of improvement: success if\> 30%
Time frame: month 6
Evaluate the effectiveness of the BCI intervention on paroxysmal pains
duration of the paroxysmal pains
Time frame: 60 days from day -30 to day + 30 , once a week from Month 1 to month 6
Evaluate the effectiveness of the BCI intervention on paroxysmal pains
the intensity of paroxysmal pains This scale measures the intensity of paroxysmal pain. It is a self-assessment. Scores measured with Visual Analog Score. The scale is graded from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain the patient can imagine). The value 10 (maximum) is the worst result. There is no combination of sub-ranges to compute the score
Time frame: 60 days from day -30 to day + 30 , once a week from Month 1 to month 6
Evaluate the effectiveness of the BCI intervention on paroxysmal pains
the frequency of paroxysmal pains
Time frame: 60 days from day -30 to day + 30 , once a week from Month 1 to month 6
Evaluate the effect of the intervention on quality of life: SF36
SF36 Questionnaire quality of life For each question, an algorithm allows the calculation of scores to obtain a number between 0 (zero quality - worse outcome) and 100 (maximum quality).
Time frame: Day 1, 12, 90, 180
Evaluate the effect of the intervention on anxiety and depression
HAD questionnaire : Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale It includes 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), resulting in two scores (maximum score of each score = 21). To detect anxious and depressive symptoms, the following interpretation can be proposed for each of the scores (A and D): * 7 or less: lack of symptomatology * 8 to 10: doubtful symptomatology - 11 and more: definite symptomatology.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Day 1, 12, 90, 180
evaluating cortical plasticity
MRI analysis the physiopathological mechanisms governing phantom pain
Time frame: Day 1, 12, 30
evaluating cortical plasticity
EEG analysis the physiopathological mechanisms governing phantom pain
Time frame: Day 1, 12, 30
Evaluate the performance of subjects to control the neurofeedback system
Motor Imagery Questionnaire
Time frame: Day 1, 12, 30