The interrelationship of restorative dentistry and periodontics is a dynamic one. The interactions between restorative dentistry and periodontal health have been well-documented both clinically and histologically. The interplay between periodontics and restorative dentistry is present at many fronts, including location of restorative margins, alloy sensitivity, crown contours, and response of the gingival tissues to restorative preparations. Periodontal tissues form the foundation for proper esthetics, function, and comfort of the dentition, as well as the periodontal health at the restorative gingival interface consider as prerequisite for successful outcome. Success of fixed prosthodontics restorations is largely dependent upon the long term health and stability of the surrounding periodontal structures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 4 new gingival retraction systems; traxodent, Gingitrac, Nocord, and cord , on the basis of the time taken for placement, hemorrhage control ,the amount of horizontal gingival displacement and periodontal parameter (PI, GI, CAL and PD).
The interplay between periodontics and restorative dentistry is present at many fronts, including location of restorative margins, alloy sensitivity, crown contours, and response of the gingival tissues to restorative preparations. And from fixed prothodontic point of view there are several factors affect the success and durability of restorations. In general, the type of impression making, setting accuracy, material flow, temperature, humidity, mixing, disinfection and pouring time have effects on the final accuracy of the indirect restorations. Supra-gingival margins are effective in periodontal health maintenance, but do not provide optimal aesthetics. The primary factor in defective record of marginal details is due to the inefficacy of the gingival displacement technique. Traditionally, procedures for soft-tissue management and isolation are classified into three main approaches: Mechanical, chemical or surgical. material and method:- 40 subjects were selected requiring fixed prosthesis according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The 4 gingival retraction systems were used on the prepared abutments randomly. The time taken for placement of each retraction system was recorded. Hemorrhage score will be recoreded. The horizontal retraction was measured on polyether impressions made before the retraction and after retraction using stereoscope. The periodontal parameter (PI, GI, CAL and PD) will be recorded pre-operative, 1 day post-operative and 7 days post-operative.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
the no cord self- retracting impression material placed directly in the tray
Cords were placed in the gingival sulcus with use of a cord packer, and left in situ for 10 min before making the impression. None of the retraction cords were immersed in any solution or medicaments prior to insertion.
packed into the sulcus
Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
RECRUITINGTime of placement
time taken for placement of each retraction system was recorded during application
Time frame: the time recorded in seconds (from 1 second to 2 minutes)
Hemorrhage score
the amount of bleedingbleeding on probing scoring as 0, 1, and 2 (0 - no bleeding, 1 - bleeding controlled within 1 minute, bleeding, 2 - bleeding not controlled within 1 minute)
Time frame: from base line to 1 day
Horizontal gingival displacement
The horizontal displacement was measured on polyether impressions made before the retraction and after retraction using steroscope.
Time frame: from baseline to 24 hours
Gingival index
according to gingival index, scored as 0,1,2 and 3( 0 = no inflamation and no gingival bleeding, 1= mild redness of the gingiva, no bleeding, 2=moderate inflammation and redness of the gingiva, edema and bleeding,3= marked redness, edema, ulceration and severe bleeding).
Time frame: at baseline ,after 1 day and after seven days
Pocket depth
according to pocket depth The probe was held with a light grasp and pointed towards the apex buccally while being parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Each measurement was rounded to the lowest whole millimetre. according to pocket depth The probe was held with a light grasp and pointed towards the apex buccally while being parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Each measurement was rounded to the lowest whole millimetre.
Time frame: at baseline, after 1 day and after seven days
Plaque index
according to the plaque index, plaque index scoring as 0, 1, 2, and 3 (0 - no plaque and 1 - a film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin and adjacent area of the tooth. The plaque may be seen in situ only after application of disclosing solution or using the probe on the tooth surface, 2 - moderate accumulation of soft deposits within the gingival pocket or the tooth and gingival margin which can be seen with the naked eye, and 3 - abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin).
Time frame: at baseline, after 1 day and after seven days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.