The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of add-on Milgamma®/ Milgamma® compositum step-therapy in patients with acute non-specific low back pain receiving modern NSAIDs in routine medical practice.
This is a multi-centre observational prospective study that was planned for assessment the effectiveness of neurotropic vitamins therapy with Milgamma®/ Milgamma® compositum in combination with modern NSAIDs (preferential/selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors) in patients with acute non-specific back pain. Approximately 500 adult out-patients with acute non-specific low back pain who have been prescribed therapy consisting of (1) modern NSAIDs (preferential/selective COX-2 inhibitors) or (2) modern NSAIDs (preferential/selective COX-2 inhibitors) + Milgamma® / Milgamma® compositum will be enrolled in the study. Each patient will be observed over a period of approximately 94 days. 9 visits/phone contacts are planned to be conducted during this period. Information about patient's condition, pain intensity, pain flare-ups, satisfaction with the treatment, patient's disability, therapy used for acute back pain treatment, data on safety will be collected during these contacts. Pain intensity will be measured with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), patients' disability will be evaluated with Roland Morris disability questionnaire, patients' satisfaction with the treatment will be assessed with 5-point verbal rating scale. Safety assessment will be based on frequency and severity of adverse drug reactions recorded during the study. Prior to the start of the study, neurologists (potential investigators) will be asked to fill out feasibility questionnaires to identify their individual routine practice regarding prescription or non-prescription of Milgamma® / Milgamma® compositum. Based on results of feasibility physicians will be divided to non-prescribers and prescribers of Milgamma® / Milgamma® compositum to the patients with acute non-specific low back pain. In each medical institution, such non-prescribers and prescribers will be proposed to participate in the study. Non-prescribers will be responsible for enrolling group (1) (NSAIDs alone), prescribers will be responsible for enrolling group (2) (NSAIDs + Milgamma® / Milgamma® compositum).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
Milgamma®: 2 mL injection solution containing thiamin hydrochloride 100 mg, pyridoxine hydrochloride 100 mg, cyanocobalamin 1 mg, lidocaine hydrochloride 20 mg. Milgamma® compositum: 1 tablet containing benfotiamine 100 mg, pyridoxine hydrochloride 100 mg.
LLC Medical Center "Nebolit"
Mytishchi, Moscow Oblast, Russia
Change of Pain Intensity After 10 Days of Treatment
Pain intensity was measured using 0-10 point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). NRS is 11-step scale for assessment of pain intensity at the moment of patient's examination ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Pain intensity was measured at baseline and at 10 days after the start of treatment.
Time frame: Baseline; Visit 3 (10 days after the start of treatment)
Change of Pain Intensity After 5, 24 and 38 Days of Treatment
Pain intensity was measured using 0-10 point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). NRS is 11-step scale for assessment of pain intensity at the moment of patient's examination ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Pain intensity was measured at baseline, at 5, 24 and 38 days after the start of treatment.Changes of pain intensity from baseline to Day 5, from baseline to Day 24 and from baseline to Day 38 after the start of treatment were calculated separately.
Time frame: Baseline; Visit 2 (5 days after the start of treatment), Visit 4 (24 days after the start of treatment); Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment)
Change of Pain Intensity Over Time
Pain intensity was measured using 0-10 point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). NRS is 11-step scale for assessment of pain intensity at the moment of patient's examination ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Pain intensity was measured at baseline, at 5, 10, 24 and 38 days after the start of treatment. A mixed model repeated measures was used to analyze change from baseline in pain intensity over time from Baseline to Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment) in each group. The model included a random effect for subject and fixed effect terms for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline pain intensity. An unstructured covariance structure was used to model the within-subject errors. P-value was calculated for the difference between treatment groups.
Time frame: From Baseline to Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment)
Percentage of Patients With 30% Low Back Pain Relief After 5, 10, 24 and 38 Days of Treatment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
LLC "Research Medical Complex "Vashe Zdorovie"
Kazan', Russia
State Healthcare Institution "Republican Clinical Neurological Center"
Kazan', Russia
Regional State Budgetary Institution of Health "Regional Clinical Hospital № 1" named after Prof. S.I. Sergeev
Khabarovsk, Russia
Federal State Healthcare Institution "Russian Scientific Center of Surgery named after academician B.V. Petrovsky"
Moscow, Russia
LLC "Medicina"
Moscow, Russia
Non-state Healthcare Institution "Central Clinical Hospital No. 2 named after N.A. Semashko of the JSC Russian Railways
Moscow, Russia
LLC "Clinical Diagnostic Center Avitsena"
Naberezhnye Chelny, Russia
LLC "Licon Plus"
Naberezhnye Chelny, Russia
LLC "Medis"
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
...and 11 more locations
Pain intensity was measured using 0-10 point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). NRS is 11-step scale for assessment of pain intensity at the moment of patient's examination ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Relief in pain intensity was defined as 100%\*(pain intensity at baseline - pain intensity at Visit 2, 3, 4 or 5)/ pain intensity at baseline. Percentage of patients showing at least 30% low back pain relief at Visit 2 (5 days after the start of treatment), at Visit 3 (10 days after the start of treatment), at Visit 4 (24 days after the start of treatment) and at Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment) were calculated separately.
Time frame: Visit 2 (5 days after the start of treatment); Visit 3 (10 days after the start of treatment); Visit 4 (24 days after the start of treatment) and Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment)
Change in Pain-related Disability After 10 Days of Treatment
Patients' disability was assessed using Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ). RMDQ is a 24-item self-administered disability measure in which greater level of pain-related disability is reflected by higher score. The RMDQ score ranges from 0 to 24 with a lower score indicating better function.
Time frame: Baseline; Visit 3 (10 days after the start of treatment)
Percentage of Patients With at Least One Pain Flare-up During the Study
Episode of pain flare-up was defined as presence of at least 1 day with low back pain following a period without pain lasting at least 4 weeks. Therefore pain flare-ups were registered no earlier than 4 weeks after the start of treatment, i.e. starting from Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment). The occurrence of pain flare-up was determined by the investigator.
Time frame: From Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment) to Visit 9 (End of Study Visit, 94 days after the start of treatment)
Percentage of Patients With at Least One Pain Flare-up Resulting in Consultancy With Physician, Resulting in Disruption of Daily Activity, and Resulting in NSAIDs Intake
Episode of pain flare-up was defined as presence of at least 1 day with low back pain following a period without pain lasting at least 4 weeks. Therefore pain flare-ups were registered no earlier than 4 weeks after the start of treatment, i.e. starting from Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment). The occurrence of pain flare-up was determined by the investigator. Percentages of patients with at least one pain flare-up resulting in consultancy with physician or professional management, resulting in disruption of daily activity, and resulting in NSAIDs intake were analyzed separately.
Time frame: From Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment) to Visit 9 (End of Study Visit, 94 days after the start of treatment)
Number of Treatment Days With NSAIDs
Number of treatment days with NSAIDs was calculated using the data collected on the NSAIDs intake during the study irrespective of the specific drug used. Duration of each intake period was determined as Stop date - Start date +1 and, finally, all individual duration values were summed up. In case medication intake was ongoing at the End of Study Visit, stop date was imputed by the date of study completion.
Time frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (End of Study Visit, 94 days after the start of treatment)/ Early Discontinuation Visit
Prescribed and Actual Number of Milgamma® Injections
Prescribed number of Milgamma® injections was reported at Baseline visit. Actual number of injections was calculated by counting the number of injections administered and reported starting from Visit 2. If the treatment was interrupted, the days patient did not receive Milgamma® injections were not contribute to the total number of injections.
Time frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (End of Study Visit, 94 days after the start of treatment)/ Early Discontinuation Visit
Prescribed and Actual Number of Treatment Days With Milgamma® Compositum
Prescribed number of treatment days with Milgamma® compositum intake was reported at Baseline visit. Actual number of treatment days was calculated by summing up all the individual periods of treatment with Milgamma® compositum (in days) reported starting from Visit 2. If the treatment was interrupted, the days patient did not receive Milgamma® compositum were not contribute to the total number of treatment days with Milgamma® compositum intake.
Time frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (End of Study Visit, 94 days after the start of treatment)/ Early Discontinuation Visit
Patient Satisfaction With Treatment
Patient satisfaction with treatment was evaluated using a 5-point verbal rating scale (1= very dissatisfied, 2= dissatisfied, 3= neutral, 4= satisfied, 5= very satisfied) after 5, 10, 38 days and 3 months (94 days) since the start of treatment.
Time frame: Visit 2 (5 days after the start of treatment); Visit 3 (10 days after the start of treatment); Visit 5 (38 days after the start of treatment) and Visit 9 (94 days after the start of treatment)
Percentage of Patients Prematurely Discontinued Milgamma®/ Milgamma® Compositum Treatment
Percentage of patients prematurely discontinued prescribed treatment with Milgamma®/ Milgamma® compositum was evaluated by reasons for discontinuation.
Time frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (End of Study Visit, 94 days after the start of treatment)/ Early Discontinuation Visit
Reasons for Early Discontinuation of Study Participation
Percentage of patient prematurely discontinued study participation by the following reasons: patient lost to follow-up, patient withdrew consent, administrative reasons, pain resolution, adverse event, death, other reason.
Time frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (End of Study Visit, 94 days after the start of treatment)/ Early Discontinuation Visit
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
As this was a non-interventional study in which NSAIDs and Milgamma® / Milgamma® compositum were administered and managed within routine medical care, safety assessment was based on frequency and severity of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) recorded during the study. ADR was defined as an adverse event (AE) suspected to be causally related to the medicinal product (Milgamma®, Milgamma® compositum or NSAID). The severity grade (mild, moderate or severe) of ADR was determined based on the investigator's judgement. Adverse events not related to the medicinal product were not monitored in this observational study.
Time frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (End of Study Visit, 94 days after the start of treatment)/ Early Discontinuation Visit