This 16 week placebo-controlled study evaluates the safety and impact of two medical food study products, WBF10 and WBF11, consisting of commensal microbes. The primary endpoints were safety, glucose AUC during meal tolerance test and C reactive protein (CRP)..
Targeting the microbiome for treating metabolic syndrome has been gaining traction with multiple population studies demonstrating a difference between healthy individuals and patients with metabolic syndrome. Whole Biome has identified and created two medical food formulations (MFFs) aimed at improving metabolic syndrome via two mechanisms of action targeting the microbiome: (1) increasing butyrate production and (2) increasing mucin regulation. This randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study assesses the safety and metabolic effects of 2 MFFs on glucose control and the generalized inflammatory state associated with Type 2 Diabetes. The microbes have been fully characterized, certified as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) and manufactured to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards. The target population was patients with Type 2 Diabetes who either had not been treated with antidiabetic agents or treated with metformin +/- a sulfonylurea. Subjects were randomized in a balanced manner to receive capsules containing placebo, WBF10 or WBF11.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
76
Science 37
Torrance, California, United States
Orange County Research Center
Tustin, California, United States
Northside Medical Center
Youngstown, Ohio, United States
Coastal Carolina Research Center
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
3-hour plasma glucose AUC
Change in area under plasma glucose concentration versus time curve (AUC) during standardized 3-hour Meal Tolerance Test
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
CRP
Change in c-reactive protein concentration
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Incremental glucose AUC
Change in area under plasma glucose concentration versus time curve (AUC) above the fasting plasma glucose level during standardized 3-hour Meal Tolerance Test
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Hemoglobin A1c
Change in A1c
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12
Fasting plasma glucose concentration
Change in fasting plasma glucose concentration
Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Fasting plasma insulin concentration
Change in fasting plasma insulin concentration
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Plasma insulin AUC
Change in area under plasma insulin concentration versus time curve (AUC) during standardized 3-hour Meal Tolerance Test
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) of Insulin Resistance (IR)
Change in HOMA-IR
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Juno Research, LLC
Houston, Texas, United States
Matsuda index
Change in Matsuda index
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Fasting Lipid Panel
Change in fasting serum concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Inflammatory markers
Change in concentrations of interleukin-6, interleukin-10, tumor growth factor-α and T-cell growth factor-beta
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Body weight in kilograms
Change in body weight in kilograms
Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI = weight in kg/m2
Time frame: At Baseline
Waist Circumference
Change in Waist Circumference
Time frame: From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Fecal Microbiome Profile
Change in Fecal Microbiome Profile assessed by DNA sequencing
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adverse Events
Number of participants with adverse events related to therapy
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Laboratory (Chemistry panel + CBC) Values
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values Related to Therapy
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Subjects respond to 14 questions; 7 anxiety focused and 7 depression focused. Responses of "not at all", "not much", "sometimes" and "definitely" are translated to a numerical score of 0 to 4 respectively. For 2 of the depression related questions, the scoring scale is reversed. The individual numerical scores are added to provide an overall score which is interpreted as follows: 0 to 7 graded a non-case, 8 to 10 graded a borderline case and 11+ graded a case. An increase in the overall numerical score from baseline to Week 12 represents worsening and a decrease in the numerical score from baseline to Week 12 represents improvement.
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12