This phase II trial studies how well berzosertib (M6620) works when given in combination with topotecan hydrochloride (topotecan) compared with topotecan alone in treating patients with small cell lung cancer that has come back (relapsed), or small cell cancer that arises from a site other than the lung (extrapulmonary). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as topotecan hydrochloride, work by damaging the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) in tumor cells, causing those cells to die and the tumor to shrink. However, some tumor cells can become less affected by chemotherapy because they have ways to repair the damaged DNA. The addition of M6620 could help topotecan hydrochloride shrink the cancer and prevent it from returning by blocking enzymes needed for DNA repair.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine if the combination of berzosertib (M6620) with topotecan hydrochloride (topotecan) will result in an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to topotecan alone in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine the objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) with the combination of M6220 and topotecan in patients with relapsed SCLC and extrapulmonary small cell cancers. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To perform molecular profiling assays on malignant and normal tissues, including, but not limited to ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing (RNA-Seq): Ia. To assess expression of genes Schlafen family member 11 (SLFN11), MYC, and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) among others. Ib. To identify potential predictive biomarkers of response to a combination of M6620 with topotecan. Ic. Identify mechanisms of drug sensitivity and resistance using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)- and RNA-based assessment platforms. II. To contribute genetic analysis data from de-identified biospecimens to Genomic Data Commons (GDC), a well annotated cancer molecular and clinical data repository, for current and future research; specimens will be annotated with key clinical data, including presentation, diagnosis, staging, summary treatment, and if possible, outcome. III. To bank formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, blood (for cell-free DNA analysis), and nucleic acids obtained from patients at the Early-Phase and Experimental Clinical Trials (EET) Biobank at Nationwide Children's Hospital. IV. To characterize circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells in patients with relapsed SCLC and extrapulmonary small cell cancers. V. To identify potential predictive biomarkers of response to a combination of M6620 with topotecan in patients with extrapulmonary small cell cancers. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts. COHORT I: Patients with SCLC are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Participants receive topotecan hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on days 1-5. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may crossover to Arm II at disease progression. Participants undergo a computed tomography (CT) scan during screening and on study as well as a tumor biopsy during screening. Participants may also undergo blood sample collection during screening and on study. ARM II: Participants receive topotecan hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5 and berzosertib (M6620) IV over 60 minutes on days 2 and 5. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants undergo a CT scan during screening and on study as well as a tumor biopsy during screening. Participants may also undergo blood sample collection during screening and on study. COHORT II (Patients with extrapulmonary small cell cancer): Participants receive topotecan hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5 and berzosertib (M6620) IV over 60 minutes on days 2 and 5. Cycles repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants undergo a CT scan during screening and on study as well as a tumor biopsy during screening. Participants may also undergo blood sample collection during screening and on study. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 4 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
104
Given IV
Undergo a tumor biopsy
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo a CT scan
Given IV
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
USC Norris Oncology/Hematology-Newport Beach
Newport Beach, California, United States
University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, United States
UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Reported With 80% Confidence Interval
The combination of M6620 with topotecan will be compared to topotecan alone in participants with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Kaplan-Meier curves and a one-tailed log-rank test will be the primary analysis methods. PFS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death. whichever occurs first. Progression was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1) and is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and/or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Time frame: From start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed at 6 months after last participant has enrolled; up to 2 years for pulmonary cohort and up 31.5 months for Exploratory Cohort.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Reported With 95% Confidence Interval
The combination of M6620 with topotecan will be compared to topotecan alone in participants with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Kaplan-Meier curves and a one-tailed log-rank test will be the primary analysis methods. PFS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death. whichever occurs first. Progression was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1) and is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and/or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Time frame: From start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed at 6 months after last participant has enrolled; up to 2 years for pulmonary cohort and up 31.5 months for Exploratory Cohort.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as percentage of participants who achieved either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as best response assessed using the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guideline (v 1.1). ORR percentage is calculated as the sum of the PR and CR rates, divided by the total number of participants who are evaluable for a response, multiplied by 100%. All participants included in the study must be assessed for response to treatment, even if there are major protocol treatment deviations or if they are ineligible. Complete response is disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions. Stable disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. Progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Overall Survival (OS) Reported With 80% Confidence Interval
OS is defined as time from randomization to death, regardless of cause.
Time frame: Up to 2 years for pulmonary cohort and up 31.5 for Exploratory Cohort.
Overall Survival (OS) Reported With 95% Confidence Interval
OS is defined as time from randomization to death, regardless of cause.
Time frame: Up to 2 years for pulmonary cohort and up 31.5 for Exploratory Cohort
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Kansas Clinical Research Center
Fairway, Kansas, United States
HaysMed
Hays, Kansas, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Lawrence Memorial Hospital
Lawrence, Kansas, United States
The University of Kansas Cancer Center - Olathe
Olathe, Kansas, United States
...and 23 more locations