endTB-Q Clinical Trial is a Phase III, randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority, multi-country trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of two new, all-oral, shortened regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) with fluoroquinolone resistance.
This is a Phase III, randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-country trial evaluating the efficacy of new combination regimens for treatment of fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB. Regimens examined combine newly approved drugs bedaquiline and delamanid with existing drugs known to be active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (linezolid and clofazimine). The study will enroll in parallel across 1 experimental and 1 standard-of-care control arms, in a 2:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified by country and extent-of-TB-disease phenotype. In the experimental arm, treatment will be for 24 or 39 weeks; duration will be assigned according to extent-of-TB-disease phenotype and treatment response. In the control arm, treatment will be delivered according to WHO guidelines (and local practice); duration will be variable. Trial participation in both arms will last at least until Week 73, and up to Week 104. Non-inferiority will be established for the experimental arm if the lower bound of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval around the difference in favorable outcome between the control and experimental arms is greater than or equal to -12%.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
323
Bedaquiline: 400 mg QD x 2 weeks, followed by 200 mg 3x/week
Delamanid: 100 mg BID
Clofazimine: 100 mg QD
Linezolid: 600 mg QD up to Week 16, followed by 300 mg QD or 600 mg 3x/week according to a secondary randomization
Control arm MDR-TB regimen, designed according to latest WHO guidelines (might include bedaquiline, delamanid, linezolid, clofazimine, or all of these drugs).
Aundh Chest Hospital
Pune, India
National Center for Tuberculosis Problems
Almaty, Kazakhstan
State Municipal Enterprise on the right of economic management "City Centre of Phthisiopulmonology" of Nur-sultan city's administration
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Partners In Health Lesostho
Maseru, Lesotho
The Indus Hospital
Karachi, Pakistan
Institute of Chest Disease,
Kotri, Pakistan
Centro de Investigación del Hospital Nacional Hipólito Unanue
Lima, Peru
Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Neumológicas del Hospital Nacional Sergio Bernales
Lima, Peru
Hanoi Lung Hospital
Hanoi, Vietnam
Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Week 73 Efficacy: Proportion of participants with favorable outcome at Week 73
Proportion of participants with favorable outcome at Week 73. A participant's outcome will be classified as favorable at Week 73 if the outcome is not classified as unfavorable, and one of the following is true: 1. The last two culture results are negative. These two cultures must be taken from sputum samples collected on separate visits, the latest between Week 65 and Week 73; 2. The last culture result (from a sputum sample collected between Week 65 and Week 73) is negative; and either there is no other post-baseline culture result or the penultimate culture result is positive due to laboratory cross contamination; and bacteriological, radiological and clinical evolution is favorable; 3. There is no culture result from a sputum sample collected between Week 65 and Week 73 or the result of that culture is positive due to laboratory cross contamination; and the most recent culture result is negative; and bacteriological, radiological and clinical evolution is favorable.
Time frame: Week 73 after randomization
Week 104 Efficacy: Proportion of participants with favorable outcome at Week 104
Proportion of participants with favorable outcome at Week 104. A participant's outcome will be classified as favorable at Week 104 if the outcome is not classified as unfavorable, and one of the following is true: 1. The last two cultures are negative. These two cultures must be from sputum samples collected on separate visits, the latest between Week 97 and Week 104; 2. The last culture result (from a sputum sample collected between Week 97 and Week 104) is negative; and either there is no other post-baseline culture result or the penultimate culture result is positive due to laboratory cross contamination; and bacteriological, radiological and clinical evolution is favorable; 3. There is no culture result from a sputum sample collected between Week 97 and Week 104 or the result of that culture is positive due to laboratory cross contamination; and the most recent culture result is negative; and bacteriological, radiological and clinical evolution is favorable.
Time frame: Week 104 after randomization
Early Treatment Response (culture conversion)
1. Proportion of patients with culture conversion assessed in MGIT system (and LJ where possible): 2 consecutive negative cultures from specimens collected at 2 different visits; if there is a missing or contaminated culture between 2 negatives, the definition of conversion is still met; 2. Time to culture conversion: assessed in MGIT system (and LJ where possible): time from treatment initiation to first of 2 consecutive negative cultures; if there is a missing or contaminated culture between 2 negatives, the definition of conversion is still met; 3. Change in time to positivity (TTP) in MGIT over first 8 weeks.
Time frame: Week 8 after randomization
Week 39 Efficacy: Proportion of participants with favorable outcome at Week 39
Proportion of participants with favorable outcome at Week 39. A participant's outcome will be classified as favorable at Week 39 if all culture results from samples collected between Week 36 and Week 39 are negative and the outcome is not classified as unfavorable. A participant's outcome will be classified as unfavorable at Week 39 in case of: 1. In the experimental arm, addition or replacement of one or more drugs; 2. In the control arm, addition or replacement of two or more drugs; 3. Death from any cause; 4. At least one culture result (from a sample collected between Week 36 and Week 39) is positive; 5. The patient is not assessable because the last available culture result is from a sample collected before Week 36;
Time frame: Week 39 after randomization
Week 73 Failure/Relapse
Proportion of participants with treatment failure/relapse. A participant's outcome will be classified as failure/relapse at Week 73 if: 1. In an experimental arm, addition or replacement of one or more drugs; 2. In the control arm, addition or replacement of two or more drugs; 3. Initiation of a new MDR-TB regimen after the end of the allocated study regimen and before Week 73; 4. At least one of the last two cultures, the latest between Week 65 and 73, is positive in the absence of cross contamination; 5. The last culture result between Week 65 and 73 is negative; and: there is no other post-baseline culture result or the penultimate culture is positive due to cross contamination; and bacteriological, radiological or clinical evolution is unfavorable; 6. There is no culture result between Week 65 and 73 or it is positive due to cross contamination; and: the most recent culture is negative; and bacteriological, radiological or clinical evolution is unfavorable.
Time frame: Week 73 after randomization
Week 104 Failure/Relapse
Proportion of participants with treatment failure/relapse. A participant's outcome will be classified as failure/relapse at Week 104 if: 1. In an experimental arm, addition or replacement of one or more drugs; 2. In the control arm, addition or replacement of two or more drugs; 3. Initiation of a new MDR-TB treatment regimen after the end of the allocated study regimen and before Week 104; 4. At least one of the last two cultures, the latest between Week 97 and 104, is positive in the absence of cross contamination; 5. The last culture result between Week 97 and 104 is negative; and: there is no other post-baseline culture result or the penultimate culture is positive due to cross contamination; and bacteriological, radiological or clinical evolution is unfavorable; 6. There is no culture result between Week 97 and 104 or it is positive due to cross contamination; and: the most recent culture is negative; and bacteriological, radiological or clinical evolution is unfavorable.
Time frame: Week 104 after randomization
Week 73 Survival
At 73 weeks, the proportion of patients who died of any cause
Time frame: Week 73 after randomization
Week 104 Survival
At 104 weeks, the proportion of patients who died of any cause
Time frame: Week 104 after randomization
Week 73 AEs and SAEs
The proportion of participants with grade 3 or greater AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) of any grade by 73 weeks
Time frame: Week 73 after randomization
Week 104 AEs and SAEs
The proportion of participants with grade 3 or greater AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) of any grade by 104 weeks
Time frame: Week 104 after randomization
Week 73 AESIs
The proportion of participants with adverse events of special interest (AESIs) by 73 weeks
Time frame: Week 73 after randomization
Week 104 AESIs
The proportion of participants with adverse events of special interest (AESIs) by 104 weeks
Time frame: Week 104 after randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.