The aim of this double-blinded controlled study is to assess clinical efficacy and safety of intra-articular HBISA Endoprosthesis of Synovial Fluid (polyacrylamide hydrogel) in comparison with placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) in Kellgren Lawrence radiological grade II-III knee osteoarthritis
Polyacrylamide hydrogel (hereinafter - PAAG) is intended for a symptomatic effect leading to decrease of joint pain intensity and improvement of functional joint characteristics. Therefore PAAG is regarded as symptom-modifying therapy for joint osteoarthritis (hereinafter - OA). The aim of this study was to estimate efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections of PAAG in comparison with saline solution. Men and women above 50 years with verified knee osteoarthritis in accordance with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups (PAAG or saline solution). Each patient received to the target knee joint one injection of 4.0 ml either PAAG or placebo with one-week interval. Course - 2 injections. To avoid the joint overfilling with the dense, slowly resorbing material in patients with a good clinical result, the course of injections was to be stopped. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, and safety parameters were assessed at weeks 6, 13 and 25 visits .
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
144
2 once-weekly intra-articular injections of NOLTREX™ 4.0 ml
2 once-weekly intra-articular injections of saline solution 4 ml
Non-budgetary healthcare facility "Railway clinical hospital n.a. Semashko N.A. at Lublino, OJSC "Russian Railways"
Moscow, Russia
"Clinical Diagnostic Center "Ultramed", LLC
Omsk, Russia
Private Healthcare Facilty "Clinical hospital "RZHD-Medicina" of the city Saint-Petersburg
Saint Petersburg, Russia
State budgetary healthcare facility of Yaroslavl Region "Clinical hospital №3"
Yaroslavl, Russia
Change of the Total WOMAC Score (WOMAC-T)
Mean change from baseline (week 1) to visit 5 (Week 25) in the total WOMAC score. Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire during the study visit 5. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Version 3.1 Visual Analog Scale Format (WOMAC VA 3.1) applies a 100 mm VAS and consists of three subscales: pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical function (17 questions). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-500 for Pain, 0-200 for Stiffness, and 0-1700 for Physical Function. Higher scores represent worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. A sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a total WOMAC score (0-2400), where 0 represents the best health status and 2400 the worst possible status. The higher the score, the poorer the function.
Time frame: baseline (week 1), week 25
Change of the Total WOMAC Score (WOMAC-T)
Mean change from baseline (week 1) to Week 13 in the total WOMAC score. Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire during the study visits 1, 3, 4, 5. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The WOMAC consists of three subscales: pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical function (17 questions). The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. Higher scores represent worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. A sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a total WOMAC score (0-96), where 0 represents the best health status and 96 the worst possible status. The higher the score, the poorer the function.
Time frame: baseline (week 1), week 13 (visit 4)
The Pain Subscale Score WOMAC-A Changes
Mean change from baseline (week 1) to week 6 (visit 3), 13 (visit 4) and 25 (visit 5) in the WOMAC Pain score (WOMAC-A). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a set of standardized questionnaires used by health professionals to evaluate pain, stiffness and physical functioning of the joints in patients with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis. The WOMAC Index Version 3.1 Visual Analog Scale Format (WOMAC VA 3.1) applies a 100 mm VAS. The WOMAC pain scale consists of five items: (1) walking on flat ground; (2) going up or down stairs; (3) at night while in bed; (4) sitting or lying; and (5) standing upright. The scores for the Pain subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-500. Higher scores represent worse pain. Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire during the study visits 1, 3, 4, 5.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: baseline (week 1), week 6 (visit 3), 13 (visit 4) and 25 (visit 5)
The Stiffness (WOMAC-B) and Functionality (WOMAC-C) Subscale Scores Changes
Mean change from baseline (week 1) to week 6 (visit 3), 13 (visit 4) and 25 (visit 5) in the WOMAC Stiffness (WOMAC-B) and WOMAC Physical Function (WOMAC-C) scores. Patients were asked to complete the questionnaire during the study visit 5. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Version 3.1 Visual Analog Scale Format (WOMAC VA 3.1) applies a 100 mm VAS and consists of three subscales: pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical function (17 questions). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-200 for Stiffness, and 0-1700 for Physical Function. Higher scores represent worse stiffness and functional limitations. The higher the score, the poorer the function.
Time frame: baseline (week 1), week 6 (visit 3), 13 (visit 4) and 25 (visit 5)
Patient Assessment of Treatment Efficacy
Patient satisfaction with treatment was measured by a 6-point scale Likert scale (evident aggravation, aggravation, without changes, weak improvement, improvement, significant improvement) at the study visits 3 (week 6), 4 (week 13) and 5 (week 25).
Time frame: Week 6, Week 13 and Week 25
Investigator Assessment of Treatment Efficacy
Investigator satisfaction with treatment was measured by a 6-point scale Likert scale (evident aggravation, aggravation, without changes, weak improvement, improvement, significant improvement) at the study visits 3 (week 6), 4 (week 13) and 5 (week 25).
Time frame: Week 6, Week 13 and Week 25
Assessment of the Total Number of NSAID Tablets Taken
A patient diary was used to capture data about the number of NSAID Tablets Taken. In case of paracetamol ineffectiveness and pain persistence patient was allowed to take Protocol-permitted NSAID in certain doses.
Time frame: week 6 (visit 3), week 13 (visit 4), week 25 (visit 5)
Assessment of the Total Number of Paracetamol Tablets Taken
A patient diary was used to capture data about the number of paracetamol tablets taken.
Time frame: week 6 (visit 3), week 13 (visit 4), week 25 (visit 5)
Patient Exclusion Rates Due to Safety
According to protocol the reasons for withdrawal included health status deterioration, investigator's decision, need in paracetamol use ≥4 days a week during 2 consecutive weeks, individual intolerance or contraindications to the study MD, placebo, paracetamol or any of the protocol-permitted NSAIDs; development of a AE/SAE requiring examination and/or treatment that can significantly affect the study procedures
Time frame: Week 25
Exclusion Rate Due to Poor Patient Compliance
According to the protocol the reasons for patients drop-out included major protocol deviations (poor compliance) and withdrawal of informed consent.
Time frame: Week 25