Objective: the objective of the present randomized clinical trial is to compare changes in radiographic peri-implant bone defect fill after regeneration of peri-implant intrabony defects with a submerged versus a non-submerged protocol. Material and Methods: this project is a randomized controlled clinical trial, double blind, with a parallel groups design. Thirty-six patients presenting with peri-implantitis subsidiary of regenerative treatment will be recruited. After subjects have been given informed consent, they will be randomized to test or control group. All patients will undergo a session of non-surgical peri-implantitis therapy consisting on prostheses removal and implant debridement with ultrasounds, curettes and air-abrasive under local anaesthesia. Patients in test group will have their prostheses removed and the mucosa surrounding the affected implants will be let heal covering the implants, while patients in control group will have their prostheses installed again after the non-surgical therapy. Six to eight weeks later, all subjects will undergo regenerative treatment with the use of a bone substitute, a collagen membrane and fixation pins, and in control group tissues will heal following the non-submerged protocol, meanwhile subjects in test group will undergo submerged healing. Six months later, subjects in test group will have their prostheses reconnected to the regenerated implants. All patients will undergo periodontal and peri-implant maintenance therapy every three months during follow-up. Radiographic assessment of vertical bone level changes (primary outcome), clinical status of peri-implant tissues, changes in soft tissues margin, patient related outcomes and adverse events will be assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months after peri-implantitis regenerative surgery.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
36
Bone regeneration of peri-implantitis defects using a bone xenograft and a resorbable collagen membrane, with flap suturing using a submerged healing protocol
Bone regeneration of peri-implantitis defects using a bone xenograft and a resorbable collagen membrane, with flap suturing using a non-submerged healing protocol
Dental School, University Complutense of Madrid
Madrid, Spain
Changes in radiographic bone fill
Changes in radiographic bone fill measured from the implant shoulder to the first bone to implant contact with ImageJ software, in parallelized periapical x-rays with individual silicone bite blocks
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Changes in pocket probing depth
Depth of the peri-implant sulcus/pocket measured in millimeters with a 15-UNC (University of North Carolina) periodontal probe, at six sites per implant without the crown
Time frame: At baseline, after non-surgical therapy, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Changes in bone probing depth
Distance from the mucosal margin to the peri-implant bone measured in millimeters with a 15-UNC (University of North Carolina) periodontal probe under local anesthesia, at six sites per implant without the crown
Time frame: At baseline, after non-surgical therapy and 12 months post-surgery
Changes in modified plaque index
Presence or absence of plaque assessed at six sites per tooth/implant in the whole mouth, excluding third molars
Time frame: At baseline, after non-surgical therapy, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Changes in full mouth bleeding scores
Presence or absence of bleeding after probing with a 15-UNC (University of North Carolina) periodontal probe, assessed at six sites per tooth/implant in the whole mouth, excluding third molars. The presence of bleeding in each site will be scored 1, and the absence of bleeding will be scored 0. Full mouth bleeding score will be expressed in percentage and calculated as follows: number of sites bleeding / number of sites explored \^ 100
Time frame: At baseline, after non-surgical therapy, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Soft tissue healing scores
Extent of soft tissue healing after surgery following Landry et al. Healing Index (1988): * Healing index 1 - Very Poor * Healing index 2 - Poor * Healing index 3 - Good * Healing index 4 - Very good * Healing index 5 - Excellent
Time frame: 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-surgery
Pain assessment
Participants´ subjective pain assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with ratings from 0-10, whereof 0 = no pain and 10 = very intense.
Time frame: 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post-surgery
Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)
Self-reported dysfunction, discomfort and disability attributed to the participants´ oral condition
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Adverse events´ occurrence
Occurrence of any untoward, undesired or unplanned event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiologic observations occurring in a subject participant in the clinical investigation. The event does not nee to be casually related to the cliinical investigation
Time frame: Up to 12 months post-surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.