This study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of multiple doses of CFZ533 (iscalimab) in patients with Sjögren's Syndrome (SjS).
This study consisted of a 6-week screening, 2 treatment periods of 24 weeks each, and a follow-up period of 12 weeks. In Periods 1 and 2, thirteen (13) treatment administration visits were planned, including a weekly loading regimen (2 visits) at the start of each treatment period. One administration equaled to two subcutaneous (s.c.) injections. This study included two distinct cohorts termed Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. * Cohort 1: subjects with moderate-to-severe systemic and symptomatic disease involvement. * Cohort 2: subjects with low systemic disease involvement but high symptom burden.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
273
Cohort 1: Change in EULAR Sjögren Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) Score From Baseline at 24 Weeks as Compared to Placebo
ESSDAI is a validated disease outcome measure for SjS that contains 12 organ-specific domains contributing to disease activity. For each domain, features of disease activity are scored in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. These scores are then summed across the 12 domains in a weighted manner to provide the total score. The domains (weights) are as follows: constitutional (3), lymphadenopathy (4), glandular (2), articular (2), cutaneous (3), pulmonary (5), renal (5), muscular (6), peripheral nervous system (PNS) (5), central nervous system (CNS) (5), hematological (2) and biological (1). The total score may vary between 0-123. It is considered low activity an ESSDAI \< 5; moderate activity 5-13, and high activity if ESSDAI is \>= 14.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Cohort 2: Change in EULAR Sjögren Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) Score From Baseline at 24 Weeks as Compared to Placebo.
The ESSPRI is a self-evaluation index for measuring symptoms including pain, fatigue and dryness. Each symptom was measured with a single 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (severe symptoms) numerical scale and the final ESSPRI score is calculated by averaging these domains with a maximum severity score of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Cohort 1: Change From Baseline in ESSPRI at Week 24
The ESSPRI is a self-evaluation index for measuring symptoms including pain, fatigue and dryness. Each symptom was measured with a single 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (severe symptoms) numerical scale and the final ESSPRI score is calculated by averaging these domains with a maximum severity score of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Cohort 1: Change From Baseline in Score of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Questionnaire at Week 24
The FACIT F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) is a validated 13 item patient reported outcome measure assessing fatigue and its impact on daily functioning over the past 7 days, with total scores ranging from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate less fatigue.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
North GA Rheumatology Group PC
Suwanee, Georgia, United States
Indiana Univ School of Dentistry
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Ochsner Health System
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
The John Hopkins Jerome L Greene Sjogren
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Tufts School of Dental Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Winthrop University Hospital
Mineola, New York, United States
Perelman School of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Uni Wisconsin School Med Pub Health
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Argentina
...and 61 more locations
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks
Cohort 1: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Week 24
Physician's global assessment (PhGA) of disease activity was performed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - an unnumbered 100 mm horizontal line ranging from "no disease activity" (score 0) to "maximal disease activity" (score 100). The assessment of patient's condition on the day is made by placing a vertical mark across the line.
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Score of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Questionnaire at Week 24
The FACIT F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) is a validated 13 item patient reported outcome measure assessing fatigue and its impact on daily functioning over the past 7 days, with total scores ranging from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate less fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Week 24
Physician's global assessment (PhGA) of disease activity was performed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - an unnumbered 100 mm horizontal line ranging from "no disease activity" (score 0) to "maximal disease activity" (score 100). The assessment of patient's condition on the day is made by placing a vertical mark across the line.
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in ESSDAI at Week 24
ESSDAI is a validated disease outcome measure for SjS that contains 12 organ-specific domains contributing to disease activity. For each domain, features of disease activity are scored in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. These scores are then summed across the 12 domains in a weighted manner to provide the total score. The domains (weights) are as follows: constitutional (3), lymphadenopathy (4), glandular (2), articular (2), cutaneous (3), pulmonary (5), renal (5), muscular (6), peripheral nervous system (PNS) (5), central nervous system (CNS) (5), hematological (2) and biological (1). The final score may vary between 0-123. It is considered low activity an ESSDAI \< 5; moderate activity 5-13, and high activity if ESSDAI is \>= 14.
Time frame: Baseline, week 24
Cohort 2: Proportion of Subjects With at Least 12 Points Improvement Measured by Score of Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Questionnaire Symptom Bother Module at Week 24.
The Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) questionnaire is a comprehensive dry eye specific questionnaire to evaluate treatment satisfaction, symptom-related bother and impact on daily life in a population with dry eye. This study only utilized the Dry Eye Symptom-Bother module. The Dry Eye Symptom-Bother module of IDEEL is composed of a single dimension (20 items). A 4-point Likert-like scale is used: from "not at all" to "very much". Patients could also answer "I did not have this symptom / Not applicable". One item is scored on a 5-point Likert-like scale from "none of the time" to "all of the time". The range for the symptom-bother score is 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom bother.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Cohort 1: Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to Week 24
The distribution of adverse events in Treatment Period 1 was done via the analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Event (TESAEs) and Deaths due to AEs, through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters. Analyses of data in the Safety Set (SAF) up to Week 24 (Period 1) is presented by actual treatment during Period 1, with data from separate cohort for the CFZ533 600mg and for the Placebo groups: CFZ533 600 mg, CFZ533 300 mg, CFZ533 150 mg and placebo.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Cohort 1: Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in All Study Periods
The distribution of adverse events was done via the analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Event (TESAEs) and Deaths due to AEs, through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters. Analyses of data in the Safety Set (SAF) for period 2/3 or overall study is presented by actual treatment sequence during periods 1 and 2, where the CFZ533 600 mg - CFZ533 600 mg sequence included data from patients in separate cohort. CFZ533 600 mg 24 Weeks arm includes only patients from Placebo - CFZ533 600 mg arm, who took at least one CFZ533 600 mg dose in Period 2 (Patients who received Placebo in Period 1 and discontinued before Week 24 are not included). CFZ533 600 mg 48 Weeks arm includes all subjects from CFZ533 600 mg - CFZ533 600 mg arm, and subjects from CFZ533 150 mg - CFZ533 150 mg and CFZ533 300 mg - CFZ533 300 mg arms but only took the first or the first two loading dose(s) in period 1.
Time frame: up to 14 weeks following the last dose of study treatment, up to maximum Week 60
Cohort 2: Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to Week 24
The distribution of adverse events was done via the analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Event (TESAEs) and Deaths due to AEs, through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters. Analyses of data in the Safety Set (SAF) up to Week 24 (Period 1) is presented by actual treatment during Period 1, with data from separate cohort for the CFZ533 600mg and for the Placebo groups: CFZ533 600 mg and placebo.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Cohort 2: Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in All Study Periods
The distribution of adverse events was done via the analysis of frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Event (TESAEs) and Deaths due to AEs, through the monitoring of relevant clinical and laboratory safety parameters. Analyses of data in the Safety Set (SAF) for period 2/3 or overall study is presented by actual treatment sequence during periods 1 and 2, where the CFZ533 600 mg - CFZ533 600 mg sequence included data from patients in separate cohort. CFZ533 300 mg 24 Weeks includes only patients from Placebo - CFZ533 300 mg arm, who received Placebo in Period 1, and either took CFZ533 600 mg loading dose + at least two CFZ533 300 mg subsequent doses in Period 2 or missed CFZ533 600 mg loading dose and took at least one CFZ533 300 mg dose in Period 2 (Patients who received Placebo in Period 1 and discontinued before Week24 are not included). CFZ533 600 mg 48 Weeks arm includes all subjects from CFZ533 600 mg - CFZ533 600 mg arm.
Time frame: up to 14 weeks following the last dose of study treatment, up to maximum Week 60
Cohort 1: Change From Baseline in Serum Free Light Kappa (FLCκ) Chains Levels
Serum samples for free light kappa (FLCκ) chains were collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 (End Treatment Period 1), Week 32, Week 40, Week 48 (End Treatment Period 2), FUP2 (Week 56), FUP 3 (Week 60)
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Serum Free Light Kappa (FLCκ) Chains Levels
Serum samples for free light kappa (FLCκ) chains were collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 (End Treatment Period 1), Week 32, Week 40, Week 48 (End Treatment Period 2), FUP2 (Week 56), FUP 3 (Week 60)
Cohort 1: Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels
Plasma samples for Immunoglobulin G (IgG) were collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24 (End Treatment Period 1), Week 28, Week 32, Week 40, Week 48 (End Treatment Period 2), FUP1 (Week 52), FUP2 (Week 56), FUP 3 (Week 60)
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels
Plasma samples for Immunoglobulin G (IgG) were collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24 (End Treatment Period 1), Week 28, Week 32, Week 40, Week 48 (End Treatment Period 2), FUP1 (Week 52), FUP2 (Week 56), FUP 3 (Week 60)
Cohort 1: Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels
Plasma samples for Immunoglobulin M (IgM) were collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24 (End Treatment Period 1), Week 28, Week 32, Week 40, Week 48 (End Treatment Period 2), FUP1 (Week 52), FUP2 (Week 56), FUP 3 (Week 60)
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels
Plasma samples for Immunoglobulin M (IgM) were collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24 (End Treatment Period 1), Week 28, Week 32, Week 40, Week 48 (End Treatment Period 2), FUP1 (Week 52), FUP2 (Week 56), FUP 3 (Week 60)
Cohort 1: Change From Baseline in Plasma CXCL-13 Levels
Plasma samples for Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL13), also known as B lymphocyte chemoattractant (BLC) or B cell-attracting chemokine 1 (BCA-1) were collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 (End Treatment Period 1), Week 32, Week 48 (End Treatment Period 2), FUP 3 (Week 60)
Cohort 2: Change From Baseline in Plasma CXCL-13 Levels
Plasma samples for Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL13), also known as B lymphocyte chemoattractant (BLC) or B cell-attracting chemokine 1 (BCA-1) were collected and analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 (End Treatment Period 1), Week 32, Week 48 (End Treatment Period 2), FUP 3 (Week 60)