In patients aged 65 years and older, polypathology is frequent and often associated with polypharmacy. This polypharmacy may be a source of iatrogeny due to pharmacokinetic interactions, enhanced sensitivity of older people to medication, or failure to adhere to the therapy. Since January 2018, French community pharmacists have been allowed by the Health ministry to perform medication reviews for people aged 65 years and over, who are being treated with more than 5 medications a day. the present hypothesis is that medication therapy management performed in collaboration with patients, general practitioners, and community pharmacists will lead to a reduction in medical events and inappropriate prescriptions.
This is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in 9 regions of France. Each region represents one cluster with 7 community pharmacies located around the University Hospital associated with that cluster. In total, 63 community pharmacies will be enrolled, with each pharmacy including 20 patients over a 10 month-period. Over the life-time of the project, a total of 1260 patients will benefit from either the intervention or from a controlled pharmaceutical care according to the period of time they will be enrolled.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
697
The intervention is in the form of a pharmacist-led medication review aimed at detecting potentially inappropriate prescribing. It includes: * A patient-pharmacist interview to collect comorbidities, medication, laboratory results, self-medication, adherence, medication patient's knowledge. * A pharmacist's evaluation of the prescriptions based on the patient's conditions and on the current recommendations for clinical practice. * Detailed feedback to the general practitioner. * An appointment with the patient to explain the modifications made by the general practitioner (GP)
Toulouse University Hospital
Toulouse, Occitanie, France
Number of patients hospitalised
Number of patients hospitalised for more or less than 24 hours, including emergency department transfers during a 12 month-period follow-up.
Time frame: Month 12
Number of patients hospitalised (only non-scheduled hospitalisations)
Number of non-scheduled hospitalisations (including emergency department transfers)
Time frame: Month 12
Existence of at least one potentially inappropriate drug per patient
Evolution of potentially inappropriate prescribing
Time frame: Month 0
Existence of at least one potentially inappropriate drug per patient
Evolution of potentially inappropriate prescribing
Time frame: Month 2
Existence of at least one potentially inappropriate drug per patient
Evolution of potentially inappropriate prescribing
Time frame: Month 12
Mean number of medications per patient
Mean number of medications per patient
Time frame: Month 0
Mean number of medications per patient
Mean number of medications per patient
Time frame: Month 12
Medication regimen complexity index
Medication regimen complexity index
Time frame: Month 0
Medication regimen complexity index
Medication regimen complexity index
Time frame: Month 12
Girerd compliance test score
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on Medication adherence. From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.
Time frame: Month 0
Girerd compliance test score
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on Medication adherence.From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value. From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.
Time frame: Month 4
Girerd compliance test score
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on Medication adherence. From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.
Time frame: Month 8
Girerd compliance test score
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on Medication adherence. From 0 to 6 Yes. 0 Yes: Best value. 6 Yes: worst value.
Time frame: Month 12
Quality of life measured with the EuroQol Group 5-level EQ-5D version
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The patients' quality of life: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Time frame: Month 0
Quality of life measured with the EuroQol Group 5-level EQ-5D version
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The patients' quality of life: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Time frame: Month 4
Quality of life measured with the EuroQol Group 5-level EQ-5D version
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The patients' quality of life: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Time frame: Month 8
Quality of life measured with the EuroQol Group 5-level EQ-5D version
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The patients' quality of life: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Time frame: Month 12
Differential cost ratio
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The cost-utility and cost-efficacy ratios
Time frame: Month 4
Differential cost ratio
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The cost-utility and cost-efficacy ratios
Time frame: Month 8
Differential cost ratio
To evaluate the impact of medication therapy management on The cost-utility and cost-efficacy ratios
Time frame: Month 12
Mean number of modifications made by the General Practitioner per patient, following the pharmacist's intervention
To evaluate the modifications made by the general practitioner due to the pharmacists' interventions
Time frame: Month 2
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.