Short-term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) is able to reverse β cell dysfunction and induce glycemic remission in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. On the other hand, intensive control of glucose and lifestyle modification are two key elements in preventing chronic complications, especially microvascular neuropathy. However, no study reported the long-term effect of SIIT on the chronic complications. In this multi-center, case-control study, effects of SIIT on the proportion of long-term chronic complications as well as potential biomarkers were investigated. In total, 777 patients with type 2 diabetes, including 259 patients who participated SIIT when diabetes was newly diagnosed and 518 patients who received routine diabetic therapy will be enrolled in 12 centers in China. After baseline assessments, all patients will undergo complications assessment, including records of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), carotid ultrasonography, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, fundus photography, urinary albumin excretion, Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Scale and Composite Autonomic Symptom Score. Primary endpoint is the difference in the proportions of macrovascular and microvascular complications between groups. Secondary endpoints include the difference of glucose control, insulin resistance, complexity of anti-diabetic therapy and self-management skills and quality of life between two groups. What's more, new biomarkers, which may indicate the occurrence of chronic complications of diabetes, such as circulating endothelial progenitor, β cell dysfunction, and T cells.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
777
Records of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), carotid ultrasonography, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, fundus photography, urinary albumin excretion, Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Scale and Composite Autonomic Symptom Score.
endocrinology department of the first affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Difference in the proportions of chronic complications
Difference in the proportions of macrovascular and microvascular complications between groups
Time frame: 5 year
Difference of glycosylated hemoglobin A1C
Difference of glycosylated hemoglobin A1C between groups
Time frame: 5 year
Difference of fast blood glucose
Difference of fast blood glucose between groups
Time frame: 5 year
Difference of C-peptides
Difference of fast C-peptides between groups.
Time frame: 5 year
Difference of insulin resistance
Difference of HOMA2-IR between groups. HOMA2-IR is calculated by fast blood glucose and C-peptide according to formula proposed by DR Matthew (the software can be accessed at http://www.ocdem.ox.ac.uk).
Time frame: 5 year
Difference of insulin usage
Compare the proportion of insulin usage (including rapidly acting insulin, regular insulin, long-acting insulin and premixed insulin) between groups
Time frame: 5 year
Difference of oral anti-diabetic drugs usage
Compare the proportion of oral anti-diabetic drugs usage (including biguanides, sulfonylureas, Glinides, glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, DPP 4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitor and their combination) between groups
Time frame: 5 year
Difference of attitudes toward diabetes
Compare the score of Diabetes Care Profile questionnaire between groups. Patients were questioned about five aspects, including positive attitude, negative attitude, ability to care for their diabetes, belief in importance of care, and self-care adherence. Each statement included a 5-point ranking scale, ranging from strongly disagree (never) to strongly agree (always), with 3 points as neutral. Items under the subscales of positive attitude, care ability, importance of care, and self-care adherence scoring ≥4 points and items of negative attitude scoring≤2 points were designated as good performance, whereas the opposites were poor.
Time frame: 5 year
Difference of quality of life
Compare the score of Diabetes quality of life (DQOL) between groups. The DQOL contains a total of 46 items, and all the items are categorized into one of the following four domains: life satisfaction (15 items), diabetes impact (20 items), social/vocational related worries (7 items), and diabetes related worries (4 items). The DQOL adopts a 5-point Likert scale for its response options. The scores range from 1, labeled as "very satisfied," to 5, labeled as "very dissatisfied," for items in the life satisfaction domain; from 1, labeled as "never impacted," to 5, labeled as "always impacted," for items in the diabetes impact domain; and from 1, labeled as "never worried," to 5, labeled as "always worried," for the social/vocational related and diabetes related worries domains. Higher score indicating better outcome.
Time frame: 5 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.