A Phase 2, multi center, open label, dual cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lorlatinib (PF 06463922) monotherapy in ALK inhibitor treated locally advanced or metastatic ALK positive non small cell lung cancer patients in China
This is a Phase 2, China only, multi center, open label, dual cohort study, in ALK positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients will be enrolled to receive lorlatinib monotherapy. * (in Cohort 1) Disease progression after crizotinib as the only ALK inhibitor. * (in Cohort 2) Disease progression after one ALK inhibitor other than crizotinib.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
109
ALK inhibitor-treated ALK-positive NSCL treatment
Gaoxin Hospital of The First Affilated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Hefei, Anhui, China
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 1)
Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1 relative to the total participants in the analysis population. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as a greater than equal to (\>=) 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Independent Central Radiology (ICR) was used for disease progression assessment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 to documented progression of disease by ICR (up to 67 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Cohort 2)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed response of CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1 relative to the total participants in the analysis population. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. ICR was used for disease progression assessment.
Time frame: From Cycle 1 Day 1 to documented progression of disease by ICR (up to 67 weeks)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on ICR Assessment
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to first documentation of objective disease progression (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever came first. PD: at least a \>=20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method. ICR was used for disease progression assessment.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Fujian Province Oncology Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Hunan Provincial Tumor Hospital/Division of Oncology
Changsha, Hunan, China
The first hospital of jilin university
Changchun, Jilin, China
Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital
Changchun, Jilin, China
Tangdu Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
Sichuan Province Cancer Hospital/Department of Pulmonary Tumor
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Cancer center
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
...and 11 more locations
Time frame: From first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented PD by ICR, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Progression-Free Survival Based on Investigator Assessment
PFS was defined as the time from first dose to first documentation of objective PD or to death due to any cause, whichever came first. PD: at least a \>=20 % increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. For non-target lesions, PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method. Investigator assessment was used for disease progression assessment.
Time frame: From first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented progression of disease by investigator, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from first dose to the date of death due to any cause. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: From first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to date of death due to any cause (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Percentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response (IC-OR) Based on ICR Assessment
IC-OR: percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed intracranial response of CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1 relative to total participants in the analysis population but limited to intra cranial lesions only in participants with central nervous system metastases. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson method.
Time frame: From first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented PD by ICR (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Percentage of Participants With Intracranial Objective Response Based on Investigator Assessment
IC-OR: percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed intracranial response of CR or PR according to RECIST version 1.1 relative to total participants in the analysis population but limited to intra cranial lesions only in participants with central nervous system metastases. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a \>= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. 95% CI was based on Clopper-Pearson method
Time frame: From first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented progression of disease by investigator (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Duration of Response (DOR) Based on ICR Assessment
DOR: time from first documentation of CR or PR to first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10mm. PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference baseline sum longest dimensions. PD:\>=20 % increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since treatment started, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to relative increase of 20% sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm and for non-target lesions PD: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at time of analysis were censored at date of last tumor assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: From first documentation of CR or PR to documented progression of disease by ICR, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
DOR Based on Investigator Assessment
DOR: time from first documentation of CR or PR to first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10mm. PR:\>=30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference baseline sum longest dimensions. PD:\>=20 % increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since treatment started, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to relative increase of 20% sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm and for non-target lesions PD: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at time of analysis were censored at date of last tumor assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier method.
Time frame: From first documentation of CR or PR to documented PD by investigator, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure
Duration of Intracranial Response Based on ICR Assessment
Duration of intracranial response: time from first documentation of CR or PR considering only lesions having disease site=brain to first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, participants who had at least 1 intracranial lesion.CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in \<10mm.PR:\>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking reference the baseline sum longest dimension. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesion, or appearance of one or more new lesion. In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm and for non-target lesion PD: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion, or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan Meier method was used.
Time frame: From first documentation of CR or PR to documented progression of disease by ICR, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Duration of Intracranial Response Based on Investigator Assessment
Duration of intracranial response: time from first documentation of CR or PR considering only lesions having disease site=brain to first documentation of PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, participants who had at least 1 intracranial lesion.CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in \<10mm.PR:\>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking reference the baseline sum longest dimension. PD:\>=20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesion or appearance of one or more new lesion. In addition to relative increase of 20% sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm and for non-target lesion PD: unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion, or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants without documentation of PD, or death at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan Meier method was used.
Time frame: From first documentation of CR or PR to documented progression of disease by investigator, death due to any cause or date of censoring, whichever occurred first (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Time to Tumor Response Based on ICR Assessment
Time to tumor response was defined as the time from first dose to first documentation of objective tumor response CR or PR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Time frame: From first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to first documented CR or PR (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Time to Tumor Response Based on Investigator Assessment
Time to tumor response was defined as the time from first dose to first documentation of objective tumor response CR or PR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as a \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Time frame: From first dose (Cycle 1 Day 1) to documented first CR or PR (up to 271 weeks of treatment exposure)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
AE:any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device;event did not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment or usage.Serious AE:any untoward medical occurrence at any dose resulted in death;life-threatening;required inpatient or prolongation of existing hospitalization;persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important event.AEs were graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria AE(NCICTCAE)v4.03 where,Grade(G)1:mild AE;G2:moderate;G3:severe;G4:life-threatening consequences,urgent intervention indicated;G5:death related to AE. Focus of AE summaries was on treatment-emergent AE(TEAE).AE was considered TEAE if the event occurred during the on-treatment period.On-treatment:time from first dose of study treatment through end of study follow-up(i.e.,up to 28 days after last dose of treatment. Participant with G3or4 and5 AEs were reported.
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 28 days after the last administration of the investigational product, up to approximately 275 weeks
Number of Participants With Central Nervous System-Related Adverse Events
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. The central-nervous system-related AEs included AEs under the cluster terms of mood effects, cognitive effects, psychotic effects, and speech effects.
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 28 days after the last administration of the investigational product, up to approximately 275 weeks
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Abnormalities
Laboratory tests included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Laboratory test results were graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.03, where Grade 0: no AE, Grade 1 : mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Shifts from Grade \<=2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 post-baseline were considered clinically significant. Only categories with non-zero values were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 28 days after the last administration of the investigational product, up to approximately 275 weeks
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria
Vital signs evaluation included diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse rate and weight. Blood pressure and pulse rate were recorded in sitting position after the participant had been sitting quietly for at least 5 minutes. The pre-specified criteria included: sitting SBP change \>=40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) increase, \>=40 mmHg decrease; sitting DBP change \>=20 mmHg increase, change \>=20 mmHg decrease, or change \>=60 mmHg increase; sitting pulse rate value \<50 beats per minute (bpm), \>120 bpm, change \>=30 bpm increase, or change \>=30 bpm decrease; weight 10% \<= change \<20% increase, change \>=20% increase or change \>=10% decrease. One participant can have more than one vital sign data meeting pre-specified criteria.
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 28 days after the last administration of the investigational product, up to approximately 275 weeks
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-specified Criteria
The QT intervals were corrected for heart rate (QTc) using standard correction factors (ie, QTcF \[Fridericia's\], QTcB \[Bazett's\], and possibly a study-specified factor, as appropriate). The pre-specified criteria included: PR interval change \>= 50% and baseline \<200 msec, change \>=25% and baseline \>=200 msec; QRS interval change \>=50% and baseline \<100 msec, change \>=25% and baseline \>=100 msec; QTcB values \<=450 msec, 450 \< Value \<= 480 msec, 480 \< Value \<= 500 msec, value \>500 msec, change \<=30 msec, 30 \< Change \<= 60 msec, change \>60 msec; QTcF value \<=450 msec, 450 \< Value \<= 480 msec, 480 \< Value \<= 500 msec, Value \> 500 msec, change \<=30 msec, 30 \< Change \<=60 msec and change \>60 msec. . One participant can have more than one ECG data meeting pre-specified criteria.
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 28 days after the last administration of the investigational product, up to approximately 275 weeks
Number of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Meeting Pre-specified Criteria
Echocardiogram or multigated acquisition scan were performed to monitor LVEF. Pre-specified criteria included shift from baseline normal to post-baseline below lower limit of normal (LLN) \>=20-point decrease from baseline in LVEF% .
Time frame: From start of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 28 days after the last administration of the investigational product, up to approximately 275 weeks
Cycle 1 Day 1 Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
The loratinib Cmax was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ,8, 9 and 24 hours on Cycle 1 Day 1
Cycle 1 Day 1 Time to Cmax (Tmax)
The loratinib Tmax was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ,8, 9 and 24 hours on Cycle 1 Day 1
Cycle 1 Day 1 Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile Within A Dose Interval (AUCtau)
The loratinib AUCtau was estimated using non-compartmental analysis.
Time frame: At pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ,8, 9 and 24 hours on Cycle 1 Day 1
Steady-State Cmax
The loratinib Cmax was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. Steady-state was reached on Cycle 1 Day 15.
Time frame: At Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Steady-State Tmax
The loratinib Tmax was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. Steady-state was reached on Cycle 1 Day 15.
Time frame: At Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Steady-State AUCtau
The loratinib AUCtau was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. Steady-state was reached on Cycle 1 Day 15.
Time frame: At Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
The loratinib CL/F was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. Steady-state was reached on Cycle 1 Day 15.
Time frame: At Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours on Day 15 of Cycle 1
Observed Accumulation Ratio (Rac)
The loratinib Rac was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. Steady-state was reached on Cycle 1 Day 15.
Time frame: At Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours on Day 15 of Cycle 1