New parameters or methods, such as ablation index, have been developed for the quantification of high-frequency energy used in pulmonary vein isolation, but there is no known method for atrial fibrillation considering individual differences in atrial tissue. The atrium is only 1/3 of the thickness of the ventricle and is thinner in women and older than men or young people. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency energy therapy using atrial individual differences. In order to reflect the thickness of the atrium, we will use the unipolar and bipolar maps and the myocardial thickness map using computed tomography (CT) images. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of energy titration therapy by random assignment of high frequency energy therapy group, CT image application high frequency energy therapy group, and existing empirical high frequency therapy group.
A. Study design 1. Prospective randomization (Unipolar voltage subtraction map guided PV(pulmonary vein) isolation group vs. CT myocardial thickness map guided PV isolation group vs. Empirical PV isolation group ) 2. Target number of subjects: 480 (160 per group) 3. Rhythm FU : 2012 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines (Holter monitoring at the baseline, 2 month, and thereafter every 6 months; ECG if the patient has any symptom) 4. Anticoagulant therapy followed by 2014 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines 5. All complications in each group will be evaluated including the re-hospitalization rate, major cardiovascular event, and mortality rate. B. Progress and rhythm/ECG follow-up 1. To be performed in accordance with the 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines for AF management 2. Follow-up at 1 weeks, 3 months, and thereafter every 6-month after procedure. 3. Rhythm control at 3 months, and thereafter every 6-month follow-up with Holter 4. If the patient complains of symptoms, ECG will be performed at any time, and rhythm follow-up will be carried out with a Holter or event recorder. C. Follow-up All the patients will be followed-up at 1, 3, 6 months, and thereafter every 6 months. If the patient shows any symptom within the clinical study period, patient will visit the outpatient clinic. ECG will be performed at every outpatient visits, and 24-hour Holter or event recording will be performed every 6 months for 2 years, and every year after 2 years (2012 Heart Rhythm Society/EHRA/European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society Expert Consensus Statement guidelines). If atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 seconds is observed in 12-lead ECG or Holter, it will be evaluated as recurrence. Recurrence within 3 months after the procedure will be classified as early recurrence, and that after 3 months will be classified as clinical recurrence.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
220
1. Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using a radiofrequency catheter 2. Esophageal temperature will be monitored to prevent esophageal injury 3. Mapping of echocardiographic unipolar voltage subtraction after atrial septal puncture 4. the electrode map data is transferred to the core lab by network to calculate the unipolar voltage subtraction color map (within 10 minutes) 5. Increase radiofrequency ablation time by 2 to 5 seconds in areas with high potential in unipolar voltage subtraction color map 6. Decrease radiofrequency ablation time by 2 to 5 seconds in areas with low potential in unipolar voltage subtraction color map 7. Evaluation of success rate and time of pulmonary vein isolation after bilateral pulmonary vein primary columnar resection 8. Evaluate time to complete isolation after additional ablation 9. Evaluation of Procedure and Ablation time, and perfusion saline dose 10. Rhythm follow-up after the procedure in accordance with the study design.
1. Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using a radiofrequency catheter 2. Esophageal temperature will be monitored to prevent esophageal injury. 3. Prepared myocardial thickness map with CT DICOM images conducted prior to procedure. 4. Increase radiofrequency ablation time by 2 to 5 seconds in thick areas in CT myocardial thickness map 5. Decrease radiofrequency ablation time by 2 to 5 seconds in thin areas in CT myocardial thickness map 6. Evaluation of success rate and time of pulmonary vein isolation after bilateral pulmonary vein primary columnar resection 7. Evaluate time to complete isolation after additional ablation 8. Evaluation of Procedure time, Ablation time, and perfusion saline dose 9. Rhythm follow-up will be performed after the procedure in accordance with the aforementioned study design.
1. Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using a radiofrequency catheter 2. Esophageal temperature will be monitored to prevent esophageal injury. 3. The procedure is performed by adjusting radiofrequency energy according to the traditional method and experience of the practitioner. 4. Evaluation of success rate and time of pulmonary vein isolation after bilateral pulmonary vein primary columnar resection 5. Evaluate time to complete isolation after additional ablation 6. Evaluation of Procedure time, Ablation time, and perfusion saline dose 7. Rhythm follow-up will be performed after the procedure in accordance with the aforementioned study design.
Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, South Korea
RECRUITINGSafety evaluation: Procedure-related cardiac complication rate
including open cardiac surgery, cerebral infarction, pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade, hematoma in the inguinal puncture site and vascular complications within 30 days post procedure.
Time frame: within 30 days post procedure
Efficacy evaluation: Atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia for at least 30 seconds after 3 months within 1 year without antiarrhythmic medication
Defined as atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia \> 30 sec after 3 months within 1 year; based on the 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring will be performed at 2 month and every 6 months, and ECG and monitoring with a Holter or an event recorder will be performed at any time if the patient complains of symptoms
Time frame: Within 1 year after 3 months of procedure
Efficacy evaluation: Major cardiovascular event rate
death, myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, and re-hospitalization for arrhythmia and heart failure
Time frame: immediate after procedure
Efficacy evaluation: Major cardiovascular event rate
death, myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, and re-hospitalization for arrhythmia and heart failure
Time frame: 12 months after procedure
Comparison of procedure time
Time frame: immediate after procedure
Comparison of ablation time
Time frame: immediate after procedure
Comparison of hospitalization period
Time frame: immediate after procedure
Comparison of anti-arrhythmic drug or anticoagulation therapy related complication rate
Time frame: 1 week after procedure
Comparison of anti-arrhythmic drug or anticoagulation therapy related complication rate
Time frame: 3 months after procedure
Comparison of anti-arrhythmic drug or anticoagulation therapy related complication rate
Time frame: 6 months after procedure
Comparison of anti-arrhythmic drug or anticoagulation therapy related complication rate
Time frame: 12 months after procedure
Comparison of anti-arrhythmic drug or anticoagulation therapy related complication rate
Time frame: 18 months after procedure
Comparison of anti-arrhythmic drug or anticoagulation therapy related complication rate
Time frame: 24 months after procedure
Comparison of anti-arrhythmic drug or anticoagulation therapy related complication rate
Time frame: 36 months after procedure
Comparison of re-hospitalization rate after the procedure
Time frame: 1 week after procedure
Comparison of re-hospitalization rate after the procedure
Time frame: 3 months after procedure
Comparison of re-hospitalization rate after the procedure
Time frame: 6 months after procedure
Comparison of re-hospitalization rate after the procedure
Time frame: 12 months after procedure
Comparison of re-hospitalization rate and number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure
Time frame: 18 months after procedure
Comparison of re-hospitalization rate after the procedure
Time frame: 24 months after procedure
Comparison of re-hospitalization rate after the procedure
Time frame: 36 months after procedure
Comparison of number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure
Time frame: 1 week months after procedure
Comparison of number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure
Time frame: 3 months after procedure
Comparison of number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure
Time frame: 6 after procedure
Comparison of number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure
Time frame: 12 months after procedure
Comparison of number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure
Time frame: 18 months after procedure
Comparison of number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure
Time frame: 24 months after procedure
Comparison of number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure
Time frame: 36 months after procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.