Over one million individuals in the U.S. have ostomies. The American Cancer Society estimates 43,030 rectal cancer cases and 81,190 bladder cancer cases will be diagnosed in 2018.Of these, at least 30,000 will receive ostomies, and an additional unknown number due to gynecologic, other gastrointestinal, or other gastro-urinary tumors. The health-related quality of life impact is tremendous and greater than with many other cancer treatments. An ostomy is often a prolonged or lifelong disabling problem for cancer survivors. The adaptation period is quite variable. In our R01 study, 18% of participants took at least one year to be comfortable, or never felt comfortable, in managing their ostomy care. Importantly, many patients cannot attend in-person self-management programs or patient groups for a myriad of reasons, including distance to travel, lack of access to transportation, monetary outlays, competing demands (such as work), or comorbidities making travel difficult. In addition, a national shortage of OCNs means patients with an ostomy, whether newly placed or a long-term issue, receive little help. It is imperative to study interventions for rural survivors aimed to limit family financial burdens, improve ostomy outcomes, and improve survivors' well-being.
An ostomy adversely affects health-related quality of life in a diverse population of cancer survivors. For cancer, ostomies are most commonly placed for rectal cancers, followed by urinary bladder cancer. Ostomies may be needed for other cancers related to bulky or metastatic disease, or in emergencies. In addition, ostomies may be placed on a temporary or a permanent basis. Temporary ostomies may be created in emergencies, such as perforation or obstruction due to tumor, or in planned procedures, as with a low rectal resection for cancer where an ostomy is placed to "protect" a new anastomosis while it heals. Temporary ostomies may become permanent as a result of underlying comorbidities, need for other treatments related to cancer, or poor outcome of anastomosis (leak or stricture). Peri-operative needs are the same regardless of ostomy permanence; survivors should receive clear, systematic, evidence-based ostomy self-management instruction and support. To cope with the challenges of their diseases, cancer survivors with ostomies should have confirmed levels of self-management skills, as well as strong commitments to self-management. Cognitive restructuring, problem-solving, and self-efficacy/locus of control are essential tools for effective self-management. As in most chronic conditions, this tends to be long-term, complex, and multidimensional. Trial-and-error ostomy self-care, nurse counseling, and community referral have been the primary modes of self-management education and support in the peri-operative period. Clearly, ostomates face many obstacles in coping with their condition, not least of which is medical care that often does not meet their needs for effective information, clinical management, psychological support, and patient activation These obstacles are likely compounded for ostomates living in rural areas. Approximately 14-19% of the US population resides in rural areas. Rural cancer survivors face significant barriers to ongoing care including lack of access to specialists and cancer-specific specialized support, longer travel distances to access follow-up care, and transportation challenges due to financial barriers or lack of a vehicle. Individuals in rural areas travel a median of 51-59 minutes to reach specialized oncology care. Additionally, some studies suggest that rural cancer patients have worse quality of life and mental health than their urban counterparts, and up to a quarter of rural cancer patients have unmet cancer information needs. Telehealth delivery of an ostomy self-management program offers an opportunity to reduce these access disparities among rural ostomates. Ostomates and their families must engage in ostomy self-management, make behavior changes, and adjust to the consequences of their condition, becoming the principal caretakers and navigators. Preparation of the survivor and unpaid designated caregiver/support person (usually family members) is requisite to assure optimal functioning and HRQOL, as well as to prevent or ameliorate ostomy-related complications and associated health care utilization. Multiple communication issues make it difficult for ostomy survivors to access resources for improving their self-management, and undermine opportunities to improve and sustain HRQOL. These resources include lack of consistent follow-up, travel issues, lack of surgeon focus on ostomy-related problems, and lack of ostomy nurse clinic resources. Ostomies are associated with multiple HRQOL difficulties. Ongoing problems include pouching care, travel out of the home (especially relevant for rural populations), social interactions, intimacy, and acceptance of/satisfaction with appearance. Studies document persistent challenges including sexuality psychological problems and interference with work, recreation, and sporting activities. However, improved self-efficacy eases the psychological and social burden of ostomies. No reports have been published on the results of a systematic ostomy self-management program to ensure optimal post-operative care, including adaptation, self-management, and ostomy comfort.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
204
Ostomy Self management Training group in which subject will learn using pouches and equipment, skincare, ostomy complications, nutritional needs, Impact on feelings, clothing changes, social relationships, being prepared for emergencies, Intimacy and sexuality, communication skills, tips for traveling and physical activity recommendations
University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
City Of Hope
Duarte, California, United States
Loma Linda University Health
Loma Linda, California, United States
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Sanford Research Center
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
Geisinger
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Lancaster General Hospital
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Penn Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of South Carolina Greenville (Prisma Health)
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Patient Activation - PAM
Patient Activation Measure. It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.
Time frame: 0 months
Patient Activation- PAM
Patient Activation Measure. It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.
Time frame: 2 months
Patient Activation - PAM
Patient Activation Measure. It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.
Time frame: 3 months
Patient Activation- PAM
Patient Activation Measure.It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.
Time frame: 6 months
Patient Activation- PAM
Patient Activation Measure.It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.
Time frame: 12months
Self-efficacy
Self-Efficacy to Perform Ostomy Self-Management Behaviors.Modified from Lorig and colleagues' Self-Efficacy to Perform Self-management Behaviors Scale, an outcome measure for Chronic Disease Management Interventions, this scale represents 8 domains (with reported Cronbach's alpha for original scales,physical activity , information seeking, support, communication with HC providers, ostomy management, social and recreational, symptom management and depression.
Time frame: 0 months
Self-efficacy
Self-Efficacy to Perform Ostomy Self-Management Behaviors.Modified from Lorig and colleagues' Self-Efficacy to Perform Self-management Behaviors Scale, an outcome measure for Chronic Disease Management Interventions, this scale represents 8 domains (with reported Cronbach's alpha for original scales,physical activity , information seeking, support, communication with HC providers, ostomy management, social and recreational, symptom management and depression.
Time frame: 2 months
Self-efficacy
Self-Efficacy to Perform Ostomy Self-Management Behaviors.Modified from Lorig and colleagues' Self-Efficacy to Perform Self-management Behaviors Scale, an outcome measure for Chronic Disease Management Interventions, this scale represents 8 domains (with reported Cronbach's alpha for original scales,physical activity , information seeking, support, communication with HC providers, ostomy management, social and recreational, symptom management and depression.
Time frame: 6 months
Self-efficacy
Self-Efficacy to Perform Ostomy Self-Management Behaviors.Modified from Lorig and colleagues' Self-Efficacy to Perform Self-management Behaviors Scale, an outcome measure for Chronic Disease Management Interventions, this scale represents 8 domains (with reported Cronbach's alpha for original scales,physical activity , information seeking, support, communication with HC providers, ostomy management, social and recreational, symptom management and depression.
Time frame: 12 months
Health-related quality of life
COH-QOL-CRC Scale.The City of Hope QOL-Ostomy questionnaire was designed for all adult ostomates, and has a 4-dimensional HRQOL (physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being) framework gathering demographic, personal (e.g. diet, work, and activity) and clinical data. It has an open-ended question of the greatest challenge of ostomy survivors. A multi-item scale section assesses overall Health-related quality of life and the four Health-related quality of life dimensions on a 0 to 10 scale. The full survey will be used at baseline; for post intervention and follow-up, only the 43 scaled items (those items sensitive to change over time) will be used. Reported Cronbach's alphas are .94 total scale and .80-.90 subscales.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 0 months
Health-related quality of life
COH-QOL-CRC Scale.The City of Hope QOL-Ostomy questionnaire was designed for all adult ostomates, and has a 4-dimensional HRQOL (physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being) framework gathering demographic, personal (e.g. diet, work, and activity) and clinical data. It has an open-ended question of the greatest challenge of ostomy survivors. A multi-item scale section assesses overall Health-related quality of life and the four Health-related quality of life dimensions on a 0 to 10 scale. The full survey will be used at baseline; for post intervention and follow-up, only the 43 scaled items (those items sensitive to change over time) will be used. Reported Cronbach's alphas are .94 total scale and .80-.90 subscales.
Time frame: 2 months
Health-related quality of life
COH-QOL-CRC Scale.The City of Hope QOL-Ostomy questionnaire was designed for all adult ostomates, and has a 4-dimensional HRQOL (physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being) framework gathering demographic, personal (e.g. diet, work, and activity) and clinical data. It has an open-ended question of the greatest challenge of ostomy survivors. A multi-item scale section assesses overall Health-related quality of life and the four Health-related quality of life dimensions on a 0 to 10 scale. The full survey will be used at baseline; for post intervention and follow-up, only the 43 scaled items (those items sensitive to change over time) will be used. Reported Cronbach's alphas are .94 total scale and .80-.90 subscales.
Time frame: 3 months
Health-related quality of life
COH-QOL-CRC Scale.The City of Hope QOL-Ostomy questionnaire was designed for all adult ostomates, and has a 4-dimensional HRQOL (physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being) framework gathering demographic, personal (e.g. diet, work, and activity) and clinical data. It has an open-ended question of the greatest challenge of ostomy survivors. A multi-item scale section assesses overall Health-related quality of life and the four Health-related quality of life dimensions on a 0 to 10 scale. The full survey will be used at baseline; for post intervention and follow-up, only the 43 scaled items (those items sensitive to change over time) will be used. Reported Cronbach's alphas are .94 total scale and .80-.90 subscales.
Time frame: 6 months
Health-related quality of life
COH-QOL-CRC Scale.The City of Hope QOL-Ostomy questionnaire was designed for all adult ostomates, and has a 4-dimensional HRQOL (physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being) framework gathering demographic, personal (e.g. diet, work, and activity) and clinical data. It has an open-ended question of the greatest challenge of ostomy survivors. A multi-item scale section assesses overall Health-related quality of life and the four Health-related quality of life dimensions on a 0 to 10 scale. The full survey will be used at baseline; for post intervention and follow-up, only the 43 scaled items (those items sensitive to change over time) will be used. Reported Cronbach's alphas are .94 total scale and .80-.90 subscales.
Time frame: 12 months
Ostomy knowledge
Ostomy Knowledge Questionnaire.This brief survey, derived at City of Hope, was modified for the pilot study and further adapted by the study team to ensure major topics were included.
Time frame: 0 months
Ostomy knowledge
Ostomy Knowledge Questionnaire.This brief survey, derived at City of Hope, was modified for the pilot study and further adapted by the study team to ensure major topics were included.
Time frame: 2 months
Ostomy knowledge
Ostomy Knowledge Questionnaire.This brief survey, derived at City of Hope, was modified for the pilot study and further adapted by the study team to ensure major topics were included.
Time frame: 6 months
Ostomy knowledge
Ostomy Knowledge Questionnaire.This brief survey, derived at City of Hope, was modified for the pilot study and further adapted by the study team to ensure major topics were included.
Time frame: 12 months
Healthcare utilization long form
Based on the model developed by Given, et al., for long-term care, this survey will gather participant self-reports of ostomy-related medical care use, productivity losses, and associated out-of-pocket expenses and time spent for ostomy care in general, and the OSMT intervention, caregivers, and paid housekeeping
Time frame: 0 months
Healthcare utilization long form
Based on the model developed by Given, et al., for long-term care, this survey will gather participant self-reports of ostomy-related medical care use, productivity losses, and associated out-of-pocket expenses and time spent for ostomy care in general, and the OSMT intervention, caregivers, and paid housekeeping
Time frame: 6 months
Healthcare utilization long form
Based on the model developed by Given, et al., for long-term care, this survey will gather participant self-reports of ostomy-related medical care use, productivity losses, and associated out-of-pocket expenses and time spent for ostomy care in general, and the OSMT intervention, caregivers, and paid housekeeping
Time frame: 12 months
Healthcare utilization short form
Based on the model developed by Given, et al., for long-term care, this survey will gather participant self-reports of ostomy-related medical care use, productivity losses, and associated out-of-pocket expenses and time spent for ostomy care in general, and the OSMT intervention, caregivers, and paid housekeeping
Time frame: 2 months
Healthcare utilization short form
Based on the model developed by Given, et al., for long-term care, this survey will gather participant self-reports of ostomy-related medical care use, productivity losses, and associated out-of-pocket expenses and time spent for ostomy care in general, and the OSMT intervention, caregivers, and paid housekeeping
Time frame: 3 months