This is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study to compare right ventricular dysfunction dependent and independent prognostic models for short-term serous adverse events in patients who are diagnosed with pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. Clinical endpoints are assessed at days 1-5. A thirty-day follow-up phone call is conducted to obtain further clinical endpoints and a quality of life assessment.
The objective of this study is to compare right ventricular dysfunction (RVD)dependent and independent prognostic models for short-term serious adverse events in pulmonary embolism (PE) patients. The target population is emergency department (ED) patients with confirmed acute PE within 12 hours of ED presentation. The primary outcome is a composite of death, delayed circulatory or respiratory dysfunction, hypoxia, and reperfusion intervention within five days of PE diagnosis. Secondary outcomes will be nonfatal bleeding, recurrence of venous thromboembolism, and hypoxia requiring oxygen supplementation. The specific aims are: 1) determine the incidence of death, circulatory and respiratory deterioration, and administration of reperfusion therapy within five days of PE; 2) determine functional outcomes 30 days after PE using the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire; 3) evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of each RVD assessment tool for clinical deterioration within five days of PE; and 4) derive a prediction model for clinical deterioration within five days of PE diagnosis. Patients with confirmed PE will be assessed for hemodynamic stability at presentation, and then will be assessed for RVD. Normotensive PE patients without RVD will be assessed by a clinically derived model (sPESI or HESTIA) to determine if they are low risk or intermediate-low risk. The investigators will then determine incidence of the clinical endpoints during the subsequent 5 days, as well as 30 days later. The 30-day follow-up will also include administration of the validated Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire (PEmbQoL).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
935
San Diego Medical Center
San Diego, California, United States
Christiana Care Health System
Newark, Delaware, United States
Orlando Regional Medical Center
Orlando, Florida, United States
Carolinas Medical Center - Main
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Compare the risk ratio odds ratio of different PE risk stratification models for clinical Deterioration
Provide and compare the number and proportion of patients with both composite and individual outcome of death, circulatory deterioration, respiratory deterioration, administration of reperfusion therapy
Time frame: Five days from diagnosis
Compare the prognostic accuracy of different right ventricular dysfunction parameters for predefined clinical deterioration outcomes within 5 days
Comparison of different Right Ventricular Dysfunction Assessments for Clinical deterioration within 5 days of PE diagnosis
Time frame: 5 days from diagnosis
Comparison of Patient Reported Pulmonary Embolism Functional outcomes at 30 days after Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis
Comparison of functional outcomes between patients with and without Right ventricular dysfunction at presentation with higher scores indicating worse outcomes THe Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire has six dimension of questions. Dimension scores are transformed into to scale from 0-100 with higher scores associated with worse outcomes.
Time frame: 30 days after PE diagnosis
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Vanderbilt Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Univeristy of Utah Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States