Cancer patients are often given the choice of delaying or avoiding treatment as one of their options. However, there is not much information guiding lung cancer patients and their clinicians regarding this approach. Active surveillance is a way of either delaying or avoiding treatment and its possible side effects through carefully watching for changes in the tumor and considering treatment if there is progression. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate active surveillance and ways to better understand if and when to treat patients with stage IA lung cancer.
The University of Vermont Medical Center is looking at determining if active surveillance is a viable option for low risk lung cancer patients. Currently, the National Cancer Care Network (NCCN) guidelines recommends considering stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for patients not well enough for surgery, which is generally well tolerated, but it's also been shown to cause significant worsening of shortness of breath, fatigue, chest pain, and in extreme cases, death. Investigators are using this pilot study as a means to determine outcomes for patients who choose an active surveillance approach. This information could change future conversations between doctor and patient regarding treatment options, giving patients the choice to choose radiation therapy or to delay treatment by taking an active surveillance approach. Investigators have published outcomes for 12 elderly patients with stage IA lung cancer who had chosen the active surveillance approach, reserving radiation therapy for when rapid tumor growth was determined (PMID 30648024). The clinical outcomes were similar to those expected if treatment had been provided, and at two years from the time the tumor was found almost half the patients were able to avoid getting radiation. By deciding to participate in this study, patients are agreeing to postpone their treatment for an active surveillance approach while continuing with a computed tomography (CT) scan regimen to follow tumor growth. Once their tumor size is determined there are parameters in place to decide when patients should consider radiation. These parameters are based on speed of tumor growth over time and tumor size.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Agreeing to postpone treatment while continuing with a CT scan surveillance regimen to follow tumor growth. SABR should be offered if either the tumor is \>3 cm in size or the VDT decreases to \<400 days.
University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Primary Objective: Freedom-from radiation rate for patients on active surveillance
Freedom-from radiation rate for patients on active surveillance
Time frame: One year
Secondary Objective: umber of participants on active surveillance with increased anxiety, depression, and uncertainty
Number of participants on active surveillance with increased anxiety, depression, and uncertainty as assessed by the FACT-L, PROMIS-Fatigue, EQ-5D-5L, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaires, change from baseline to end of study.
Time frame: Two years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
26