Multi-centre, non-randomised, non-controlled quasi-experimental study with nested qualitative study and economic appraisal. Improving the identification of patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease in primary care, caused by conditions such as familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), is a well-recognised national priority to prevent morbidity and mortality by early effective intervention. This study will prospectively evaluate the clinical utility of the new primary care FH identification tool (FAMCAT) for identifying undiagnosed FH in routine primary care practice; and to assess its appropriateness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness. This study will answer the following research questions (RQ): 1. What is the detection rate for new genetically-confirmed FH cases using the FAMCAT algorithm? 2. Is the FAMCAT tool appropriate and acceptable to practitioners and patients? 3. How can the FAMCAT tool be optimised to improve identification of FH? 4. What is the potential cost-effectiveness of the FAMCAT tool compared with current practice to identify patients with FH? 5. Can the FAMCAT intervention be improved? 6. What definitive study design and outcome measures are needed to provide robust evidence on whether to introduce FAMCAT into primary care practice? RQ(1) \& (3) will be answered by a quasi-experimental diagnostic accuracy study; RQ(2) \& (5) answered by qualitative study; RQ (4) answered by economic appraisal and RQ(6) informed by all previous studies.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
400
The intervention is a computer-based software algorithm (FAMCAT) for use in general practice with a family history questionnaire.
Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Detection of genetically confirmed new FH cases using case identification tool (FAMCAT)
Efficacy measure: Proportion (%) of genetically-confirmed FH cases Proportion (%) of genetically-confirmed FH cases
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Acceptability of FAMCAT
Efficacy measure: representativeness of qualitative interview sample. Key themes will be identified from qualitative interview transcripts of patient experience of participating in the study, acceptability of the study procedures (ie. location of blood test clinic appointments, waiting time to receive test results) , and appropriateness of methods of contact with study participants (ie. format and content of study materials, communicating test results). Key themes on usability will be identified from qualitative interview transcripts of health care professionals who used the FAMCAT tool clinically (ie. search criteria for clinical records, interpretation of results)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Appropriateness of FAMCAT
Efficacy measure: representativeness of qualitative interview sample. Key themes will be identified from qualitative interview transcripts of patient experience of appropriateness of methods of contact with study participants (ie. format and content of study materials, communicating test results).
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Usability of FAMCAT
Efficacy measure: representativeness of qualitative interview sample. Key themes on usability will be identified from qualitative interview transcripts of health care professionals who used the FAMCAT tool clinically (ie. search criteria for clinical records, interpretation of results)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Self-reported anxiety measures for use in a future trial
Anxiety measured using 6 item Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The total score will be calculated at study entry, after receiving genetic test results and 12- 15 months after genetic tests results received
Time frame: Baseline to 15 months after genetic test results reported
Self-reported lifestyle change measures for use in a future trial
Stages of change for smoking cessation and physical activity will be measured. The five stages of change will be dichotomised into: (1) pre-contemplation, contemplation and preparation and (2) action/maintenance. The distribution of proportions for each measure will be presented at study entry, after receiving genetic test results and 12- 15 months after genetic tests results received
Time frame: Baseline to 15 months after genetic test results reported
Beliefs about predisposition to coronary heart disease
Beliefs on causes for heart disease were assessed using 8 items, from a total of 18 items, which comprise the 'Causes of my illness' subscale in the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire, IPQ-R. The distribution of data for each one of the 8 questions will be presented at study entry, after receiving genetic test results and 12- 15 months after genetic tests results received
Time frame: Baseline to 15 months after genetic test results reported
Cost-effective FAMCAT threshold to identify genetically confirmed FH
Efficacy measure: Primary analysis: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of FAMCAT compared to Simon-Broome criteria; Sensitivity analysis: Incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) of FAMCAT at different testing thresholds. Short-term model: 24 Months
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.