The Options for Delivering Isoniazid-Rifapentine (3HP) for TB Prevention (3HP Options Implementation Trial) study will be a three-arm, open-label, parallel, randomized trial. This hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial will be conducted among people living with HIV infection (PLHIV) enrolled in HIV/AIDS care at the Mulago Immune Suppression Syndrome (i.e., HIV/AIDS) clinic in Kampala, Uganda. The overall objective of this study is to identify a patient-centered delivery strategy that will facilitate acceptance and completion of a three-month (12-dose) regimen of weekly rifapentine (RPT) and isoniazid (INH) by PLHIV enrolled in routine HIV/AIDS care in a high HIV/TB burden country. The primary outcome will be acceptance and completion of 3HP. Additional objectives will be to evaluate the implementation and cost-effectiveness of each delivery strategy.
The overall objective of this study is to identify a patient-centered strategy that will facilitate 3HP uptake by PLHIV in the context of routine HIV/AIDS care in a high HIV/TB burden country. The investigators' central hypothesis is that offering PLHIV an informed choice between directly observed therapy (DOT) and self-administered therapy (SAT) delivery strategies that are optimized to overcome key barriers to treatment adherence will result in greater acceptance and completion of 3HP. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic randomized trial of three optimized strategies for delivering 3HP. Eligible participants will be randomized to one of three arms to receive latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment with once weekly INH and RPT for 12 weeks given by either facilitated DOT, facilitated SAT, or an informed choice between facilitated DOT and facilitated SAT (with the assistance of a decision aid tool). Primary Objective: To compare the uptake of 3HP under three delivery strategies: 1) Facilitated DOT; 2) Facilitated SAT; and 3) Informed patient choice (using a decision aid) between facilitated DOT and facilitated SAT. The primary outcome will be defined as the proportion of eligible participants who accept treatment and take at least 11 of 12 doses of RPT/INH within 16 weeks of treatment initiation. Study staff will assess medication dosing using clinic records for participants taking 3HP by DOT and using a combination of 99DOTS (Everwell Health Solutions, India) digital medication adherence technology records and pill counts at refill visits for participants taking 3HP by SAT. Secondary Objectives: 1. To estimate the costs and compare the cost-effectiveness of the three strategies for delivering 3HP. 2. To identify processes and contextual factors that influence patient acceptance and completion of 3HP under each delivery strategy. 3. To identify clinic-level barriers to adoption and implementation of 3HP under each delivery strategy. 4. To determine the proportion of patients for whom 3HP treatment is discontinued due to adverse events/intolerance. 5. To determine the cumulative 16-month incidence of active TB in each arm, categorized as definite (positive sputum Xpert MTB/RIF or culture) or probable (TB medications started at the discretion of a clinician, with evidence of subsequent improvement). 6. To determine the cumulative 28-month incidence of active TB in each arm, categorized as definite (positive sputum Xpert MTB/RIF or culture) or probable (TB medications started at the discretion of a clinician, with evidence of subsequent improvement).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
1,656
Streamlined, weekly DOT clinic visits to have health worker observe medication ingestion and screen for side effects
Weekly SMS or interactive voice response (IVR) phone call reminder for DOT clinic visits
Reimbursement of costs associated with weekly clinic visits (15,000 Ush/visit in Weeks 2-12)
99DOTS-based digital adherence technology to monitor and promote adherence
Weekly SMS or IVR phone call dosing reminder/check-in for side effects
Reimbursement of costs associated with streamlined refill and end-of treatment clinic visits (15,000 Ush/visit in Weeks 6 and 12)
Mulago Immune Suppression Syndrome (ISS) Clinic
Kampala, Uganda
Proportion of Participants Who Accepted and Completed 3HP
The count of eligible participants who accept treatment and take at least 11 of 12 once weekly doses of rifapentine (RPT)/isoniazid (INH) within 16 weeks of treatment initiation divided by the count of those randomized.
Time frame: Within 16 weeks of treatment initiation
Proportion of Participants Who Accepted 3HP Treatment
The count of eligible people living with HIV (PLHIV) offered 3HP who accept to initiate treatment (by age, gender, CD4 stratum, viral load suppression) divided by the count of those randomized.
Time frame: Within 16 weeks of treatment initiation
Proportion of Participants Who Completed 3HP Treatment
Count of participants who take at least 11 of 12 doses within 16 weeks of treatment initiation divided by the count those who take at least one dose of 3HP.
Time frame: Within 16 weeks of treatment initiation
Proportion of People Who Discontinued 3HP Treatment Due to Adverse Events/Intolerance
Count of participants for whom treatment is discontinued due to adverse events or intolerance divided by the count of those who initiated 3HP.
Time frame: Within 16 weeks of treatment initiation
Cumulative Incidence of Tuberculosis (TB)
Cumulative 16-month incidence of active TB in each arm
Time frame: from date of 3HP treatment completion (11/12 doses) or once reached 16 weeks (regardless of number of doses taken) until time of active TB diagnosis or treatment initiation, death, loss to follow-up or end of the 12-month post-treatment follow-up period
Cumulative Incidence of TB
Cumulative 28-month incidence of active TB in each arm
Time frame: from date of 3HP treatment completion (11/12 doses) or once reached 16 weeks (regardless of number of doses taken) until time of active TB diagnosis or treatment initiation, death, loss to follow-up or end of the 24-month post-treatment follow-up period
Cost Effectiveness (Patient Perspective)
The incremental patient cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted.
Time frame: At the conclusion of the study period, estimated 3 years
Cost Effectiveness (Health System Perspective)
The incremental health system cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted.
Time frame: At the conclusion of the study period, estimated 3 years
Cost Effectiveness (Overall Perspective)
Incremental cost of each delivery strategy per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted.
Time frame: At the conclusion of the study period, estimated 3 years
Visit Cost Reimbursement - Overall
Proportion reimbursed overall
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Visit Cost Reimbursement
Proportion reimbursed on the same day as each 3HP clinic visit
Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Time to Complete Clinic Visit - Mean Minutes
Mean number of minutes for each DOT/refill visit
Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Time to Complete Clinic Visit - Median Minutes
Median number of minutes for each DOT/refill visit
Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Short Messages Service (SMS) or Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Phone Call Reminders Delivered - Clinic Visits
Proportion of SMS or IVR phone call reminders delivered to participants for clinic visits
Time frame: The day before each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Screening for Active TB
Proportion of participants screened for active TB during DOT or refill visits
Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Screening for Side Effects
Proportion of participants screened for side effects during DOT or refill visits.
Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Dosing Confirmation Via 99DOTS (SAT Only)
Proportion of doses confirmed using digital adherence technology. Doses directly observed (i.e., during initial or refill visits) will not be included in the denominator.
Time frame: On the same day as each scheduled dose throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
SMS or IVR Phone Call Reminders Delivered - Medication Dosing (SAT Only)
Proportion of SMS or IVR phone call reminders delivered to participants for medication dosing
Time frame: The day before each scheduled dose throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
SMS or IVR Phone Calls Delivered - Weekly check-in (SAT Only)
Proportion of weekly SMS or IVR phone call check-ins delivered to participants
Time frame: On the same day as each scheduled dose throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
SMS or IVR Phone Call Reminders Delivered - Missed Dose (SAT Only)
Proportion of SMS or IVR phone call reminders delivered to participants following missed doses
Time frame: 24 hours after missed scheduled dose throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
SMS or IVR Phone Call Missed Appointment Reminders Delivered
Proportion of SMS or IVR phone call reminders delivered to participants following missed appointments
Time frame: 24 hours after missed scheduled appointment throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Follow up (Phone Calls or Home Visits) for Negative Response to Weekly SMS or IVR Phone Call check-in (SAT Only)
Proportion of participants who receive appropriate follow-up (phone call or home visit) for lack of response/negative response to weekly check-in SMS or IVR phone call
Time frame: 24 hours after negative response throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Costs of Preventive Services
Mean total participant costs related to TB preventive care services
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Participant Satisfaction
Mean score on participant satisfaction questionnaire
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 16 weeks
Barriers to 3HP Delivery From the Provider/Clinic Perspective
Thematic interpretation of provider- and clinic-level barriers to care from provider focus group discussions.
Time frame: At the conclusion of the study period, estimated 3 years
Barriers to 3HP Completion From the Patient Perspective
Thematic interpretation of barriers to 3HP completion from patient interviews
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 16 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.