This study compares low-dose prednisolone therapy against standard regimens of hydrocortisone therapy for the treatment of adrenal insufficiency (AI). AI is a condition in which, individuals are unable to sufficiently produce the natural stress hormone, cortisol.
Steroid replacement therapy is vital for the health of patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI), who are unable to produce the natural stress hormone, cortisol. The objectives of steroid replacement therapy are to replace the body's physiological requirements for cortisol without over-replacement and consequent Cushing's syndrome. Equally, under-replacement presents the risk of patients experiencing potentially fatal Addisonian crises. Appropriately replacing a patient's steroid requirement is a significant challenge. Hydrocortisone (HC) is used in the majority of patients with AI in the UK. However, HC has a short duration of action, necessitating dosing 3 times a day. Low-dose prednisolone (PR) is an alternative to HC which needs only once-daily. There have been no studies directly comparing low-dose PR to HC treatment. This is a two-arm, two-period, double-blind, randomised, cross-over study comparing the low dose PR and standard regimens of HC in the treatment of AI.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
44
Low dose prednisolone for the treatment of adrenal insufficiency. Usually administered once daily
Standard regimens of hydrocortisone for the treatment of adrenal insufficiency. Usually administered thrice daily.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
Change in concentration of Osteocalcin
Assesses bone health of each group by comparing total osteocalcin and undercarboxylated osterocalcin
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Change in concentration of P1NP
Assesses bone health of each group by comparing P1NP
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Change in concentration of BALP
Assesses bone health of each group by comparing BALP
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Change in concentration of NTX
Assesses bone health of each group by comparing NTX
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Heart Rate
recording observations- heart rate
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
recording observations- blood pressure
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Waist-Hip circumference
recording observations- Waist-Hip circumference ratios
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in concentration of Lipid profile (Total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides)
measuring biochemical indicators of cardiovascular risk: total cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Change in concentration of high sensitivity CRP
measuring biochemical indicators of cardiovascular risk: high sensitivity CRP
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Change in concentration of Glucose
measuring glucose
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Change in concentration of HbA1c
measuring HbA1c
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Infection rates and severity
assessed by completion of the German National Cohort Questionnaire (GNCQ). Frequency (None; 1; 2; 3; \>3; Unknown) of 1. Upper respiratory tract infections; 2. Lower respiratory tract infections; 3.Gastroenteritis; 4. Mucosal infections; 5. Urinary tract infections; 6. Influenza; will be recorded. The frequencies of each type of infection will be compared between time points.
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Wellbeing assessed by completion the short form health survey
assessed by completion the short form health survey-36 (SF-36). Scores will be produced in each of 8 domains (Physical functioning, Role functioning/physical, Role functioning/emotional, Energy/fatigue, Emotional wellbeing, Social functioning, Pain, General Health and Health Change). Each domain is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores suggesting more positive outcomes. Scores will be compared in each domain between time points.
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.
Wellbeing assessed by completion the Addi-QoL questionnaire
assessed by completion the Addi-QoL questionnaire. A total score between 30 and 120 is produced, with higher scores suggesting a more positive outcome. The score is compared between time points.
Time frame: Between Day 1 and Day 120 within each study period; and between Day 120 of Period 1 and Period 2.