The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the clinical benefits of an MultiSite pacing (MSP) with patient specific left ventricular vector optimization in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after 6 months of therapy. This clinical investigation is a single-center, prospective, two-arm, randomized 1:1, crossover study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Optimized MSP CRT compared to conventional bi-ventricular pacing. Data will be collected at enrolment, CRT implant procedure, hospital pre-discharge, one, three and six months post implant. Enrolment data collection will include demographics, cardiovascular history, medication, echocardiography measurements, heart failure quality of life questionnaire and six minute walk test distance. CRT implant procedure data collection will include implanted system information, lead location and conduction times. The electrical conduction recording procedure will include surface ECG and device electrogram (EGM) recordings during various MSP vector pacing configurations at the time of CRT device implant. Patients will also undergo simultaneous invasive pressure measurements using a left ventricular pressure wire to allow haemodynamic measurements (dP/dtmax) during various MSP vector pacing configurations. Optimal MSP programming settings will be determined by the narrowest QRS duration recorded by 12 lead ECG and the greatest change in dP/dtmax by pressure wires study. In a subgroup of patients (approximately 25 patients), non-invasive electrical activation data will be collected with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) within 45 days of the implant procedure. Patients will then be randomized 1:1 to receive either standard biventricular pacing or Optimized MSP at their one-month follow-up (± 15 days) visit. At the 3 months (± 15 days) post randomization follow up visit, data collection will include surface ECG, EGMs, echocardiographic parameters and quality of life questionnaire. The patients will then undergo cross-over to the alternate randomization group with programming adjusted accordingly. At the final, 6 months (± 15 days) post randomization follow-up visit, data collection will include surface ECG, EGMs, echocardiographic parameters and quality of life questionnaire. This will mark the completion of the study for each patient. The expected duration of enrolment is 18 months. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 25 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
The intervention includes using optimal programming settings with MultiSite pacing configurations via the patient's CRT device. The device in use is the same for each arm, the only changes are the programming settings.
Conventional programming settings using biventricular pacing will be used
St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
Echocardiographic clinical response
Response to optimised MSP CRT compared to BiV CRT defined by LV systolic volume reduction of greater than 15% (indicative of "reverse remodelling") at completion of follow up.
Time frame: 3 and 6 months post randomization
Acute changes in surface ECG QRS duration and morphology
QRS duration changes with CRT programming optimisation
Time frame: Acute change in QRS duration with pacing compared to intrinsic QRS duration, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
Acute change in LV dP/dtmax
Changes in LV contractility as assessed by pressure wire
Time frame: Acute change in LV dP/dtmax with pacing compared to intrinsic rhythm, measured during pacing programming protcol at device implant
Change in exercise capacity by 6MWT distance
6 minute walk test distance
Time frame: Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
Change in NYHA functional class
New York Heart Association Functional class
Time frame: Pre-implant, 3 and 6 months post randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.