Surgical Intervention With DermaPure vs Native Tissue in Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants50 enrolled

Overview

Comparing FDA-approved DermaPure with patient's own native tissue surgically for diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.

The investigator is comparing FDA-approved DermaPure with patient's own native tissue for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Please see below for detailed objectives and endpoints for our measuring parameters: Objectives Specific Aim #1: To determine the relative safety and efficacy of anterior and multi-compartment vaginal wall prolapse repair augmented with decellularized human dermal allograft (DermaPure®) versus anterior and multi-compartment repair employing native tissue. Specific Aim #2: To evaluate bulge symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, and patient satisfaction Our hypothesis is that pelvic organ prolapse repair augmented with DermaPure® will provide superior anatomic outcomes as compared to native tissue controls with a non-inferior safety profile. Endpoints Safety Endpoint #1: The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related SAE's at 12 months. Safety Endpoint #2: The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related AE's of interest at 12 months, which include: * Vaginal shortening * Vaginal scarring or banding * De novo vaginal bleeding * Atypical vaginal discharge * Fistula formation * De novo dyspareunia * Pelvic pain * Peri-operative infection * Vaginal infection * UTI * Neuromuscular disorder * SUI (worsening or de novo) * UUI (worsening or de novo) * Difficulty emptying bladder (worsening or de novo) * Graft exposure (into vagina) * Graft erosion (into viscus) Efficacy Endpoint #1: The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with prolapse of the target compartment beyond the hymen. Efficacy Endpoint #2: The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with bulge symptoms attributable to the target compartment as determined by PFDI-20 question number 3 ("Does the participant usually have a bulge or something falling out that the participant can see or feel in the vaginal area") answering "yes" and \>= 2 (responses of "somewhat", "moderately", or "quite a bit"). (Barber) Efficacy Endpoint #3: The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months requiring re-treatment for recurrent prolapse of the target compartment (to include surgery, physical therapy or pessary insertion). Efficacy Endpoint #4: Change in quality of life in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PFDI-20 and the PFIQ-7. (Barber) Efficacy Endpoint #5: Change in sexual function in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PISQ-IR. (Rogers) Efficacy Endpoint #6: Patient satisfaction in each group at 36 months as measured by the SSQ-8. (Haff) Efficacy Endpoint #7: Patient impression in each group at 36 months of postoperative improvement by the PGI-I (Srikrishna)

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Interventions

DermaPure®BIOLOGICAL

Surgical intervention using DermaPure®

native tissuePROCEDURE

Surgical intervention using native tissue

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion criteria: * Subject is female * Subject is at least 18 years of age * Subject has prolapse of the anterior compartment beyond the hymen * Subject reports bulge symptoms as defined in question 3 of the PFDI-20 with a response of 2 or higher ("somewhat", "moderately" or "quite a bit") * Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent * Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up protocol through 36 months Exclusion criteria: * Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study * Subject has untreated severe urogenital atrophy * Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, untreated urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis * Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical) * Subject has had prior pelvic radiation therapy * Subject has taken systemic steroids within the last month, or immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment within the last 3 months (list attached) * Subject has a history of poor wound healing with or without a diagnosis of connective tissue disease * Subject has chronic systemic pain that includes the pelvic area or chronic focal pain that involves the pelvis * Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) as defined by a hemoglobin A1C \< or = to 8% (Underwood, Ata) * Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition that may effect of currently affects bladder function * Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (colpocleisis) * Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position * Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another pelvic organ prolapse related study during this study * Subject has had previous prolapse repair with synthetic mesh in the anterior compartment * Subject is planning to undergo a concomitant prolapse repair in a non-target compartment with anything other than native tissue or DermaPure® * Subject is unable to be treated in the anterior compartment with DermaPure® * Subject is desirous of a concomitant hysteropexy

Locations (1)

Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Safety through AE and SAE assessments and percentage of incidences

The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related SAE's is assessed at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months. The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related AE's of interest is assessed at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months which include: * Vaginal shortening * Vaginal scarring or banding * De novo vaginal bleeding * Atypical vaginal discharge * Fistula formation * De novo dyspareunia * Pelvic pain * Peri-operative infection * Vaginal infection * UTI * Neuromuscular disorder * SUI (worsening or de novo) * UUI (worsening or de novo) * Difficulty emptying bladder (worsening or de novo) * Graft exposure (into vagina) * Graft erosion (into viscus)

Time frame: 3 years

Quality of Life through the administration of questionnaires, analyzed at the end of the study as % of patients that are satisfied or above satisfied

The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with bulge symptoms attributable to the target compartment as determined by PFDI-20 question number 3 ("Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area") answering "yes" and \>= 2 (responses of "somewhat", "moderately", or "quite a bit"). (Barber) Change in quality of life in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PFDI-20 and the PFIQ-7. (Barber)

Time frame: 3 years

Central Contacts

CATHERINE JAY

CONTACT

3039558059 cjay@surgone.com

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.