The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of letermovir (LET) in pediatric participants. Participants will be enrolled in the following 3 age groups: Age Group 1: From 12 to \<18 years of age (adolescents); Age Group 2: From 2 to \<12 years of age (children); and Age Group 3: From birth to \<2 years of age (neonates, infants and toddlers). All participants will receive open label LET for 14 weeks (\~100 days) post-transplant, with doses based on body weight and age.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
65
Granules administered orally based on age, weight, and whether participant takes cyclosporin A as a concomitant medication.
Tablet administered orally based on age, weight, and whether participant takes cyclosporin A as a concomitant medication.
Letermovir administered intravenously based on age, weight, and whether participant takes cyclosporin A as a concomitant medication.
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center ( Site 0251)
Duarte, California, United States
Children's Hospital of Orange County ( Site 0241)
Orange, California, United States
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital San Francisco ( Site 0245)
San Francisco, California, United States
University Of Chicago School Of Medicine ( Site 0253)
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Boston Children's Hospital ( Site 0243)
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-24) of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages 2 - <18 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 - \<18 years in order to determine the AUC0-24 of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \< 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
AUC0-24 of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 to \<12 years in order to determine the AUC0-24 of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \<2 and \>12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
AUC0-24 of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages <2 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged \<2 years in order to determine the AUC0-24 of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged 2 - \<18 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. The measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Maximal Concentration (Cmax) of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages 2 - <18 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 - \<18 years in order to determine the Cmax of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \< 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Cmax of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 to \<12 years in order to determine Cmax of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \<2 and \>12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Cmax of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages < 2 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged \<2 years in order to determine the Cmax of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged 2 - \<18 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. The measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Minimum Concentration of Plasma Letermovir Observed Before Next Dose (Ctrough) Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages 2 - <18 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 - \<18 years in order to determine the Ctrough of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \< 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: 24 hours post-dose
Ctrough of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 to \<12 years in order to determine Ctrough of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \<2 and \>12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Ctrough of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Oral Formulation by Ages < 2 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged \<2 years in order to determine the Ctrough of plasma letermovir for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged 2 - \<18 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. The measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2.
Time frame: Day 7: 24 hours post-dose
AUC0-24 of Plasma Letermovir Taken as Intravenous (IV) Formulation by Ages 12 - <18 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 12 - \<18 years in order to determine the AUC0-24 of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \< 12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
AUC0-24 of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 to \<12 years in order to determine the AUC0-24 of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \< 2 years and \> 12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
AUC0-24 of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 to \<12 years in order to determine the AUC0-24 of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \> 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. The measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
AUC0-24 of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages <2 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged \<2 years in order to determine the AUC0-24 of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \> 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. The measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Concentration at the End of Infusion (Ceoi) of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages 12 - <18 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 12 - \<18 years in order to determine the Ceoi of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. As samples were collected outside the collection window Ceoi for these samples were predicted by using a log linear model .Participants aged \< 12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Ceoi of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 to \<12 years in order to determine the Ceoi of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. As samples were collected outside the collection window Ceoi for these samples were predicted by using a log linear model. Participants aged \< 2 years and \> 12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Ceoi of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages s 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 to \<12 years in order to determine the Ceoi of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. As samples were collected outside the collection window Ceoi for these samples were predicted by using a log linear model. Participants aged \> 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. A measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Ceoi of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages <2 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged \<2 years in order to determine the Ceoi of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. As samples were collected outside the collection window Ceoi for these samples were predicted by using a log linear model. Participants aged \> 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. A measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Ctrough of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages 12 - <18 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 12 - \<18 years in order to determine the Ctrough of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \< 12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: 24 hours post-dose
Ctrough of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged 2 to \<12 years in order to determine the Ctrough of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \< 2 years and \> 12 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion.
Time frame: Day 7: 24 hours post-dose
Ctrough of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages 2 to <12 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged \<2 years in order to determine the Ctrough of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \> 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. The measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Ctrough of Plasma Letermovir Taken as IV Formulation by Ages <2 Years
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 from participants aged \<2 years in order to determine the Ctrough of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant. Participants aged \> 2 years were not presented as their data analysis resulted in a different measure type and method of dispersion. The measure type is Geometric Mean, and a measure of dispersion is not determined when N \<2.
Time frame: Day 7: Pre-dose, 1, 2.5, 8, and 24 hours post-dose
Ctrough of Plasma Letermovir Taken During Sparse PK for Oral Formulation
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 in order to determine the Ctrough of plasma letermovir during sparse PK for participants receiving oral formulation. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant.
Time frame: Day 7: 24 hours post-dose
Ctrough of Plasma Letermovir Taken During Sparse PK as IV Formulation
Blood was collected on treatment Day 7 in order to determine the Ctrough of plasma letermovir for participants receiving IV formulation during sparse PK. Individual values were natural log transformed and evaluated separately with a linear mixed effects model containing a fixed effect for treatment and a random effect for participant.
Time frame: Day 7: 24 hours post-dose
Percentage of Participants With One or More Adverse Event (AE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The 95% confidence interval (CI) is based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.
Time frame: Up to Week 48 post-transplant (up to 52 weeks)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Medication Due to an AE.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The 95% CI is based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson.
Time frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant (up to 18 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant CMV Infection Through Week 14 Post-transplant
Clinically significant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is defined as CMV end organ disease (proven or probable) or initiation of pre-emptive therapy (PET) based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson. Missing values: were handled by the Non-Completer=Failure (NC=F) approach. where failure was defined as all participants who developed clinically significant CMV infection or prematurely discontinued from the study or had a missing outcome through week 14 post-transplant visit window.
Time frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant (up to 18 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant CMV Infection Through Week 24 Post-transplant
Clinically significant CMV infection is defined as CMV end organ disease (proven or probable) or initiation of PET based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on the exact binomial method proposed by Clopper and Pearson. Missing values: were handled by the Non-Completer=Failure (NC=F) approach. where failure was defined as all participants who developed clinically significant CMV infection or prematurely discontinued from the study or had a missing outcome through week 24 post-transplant visit window.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center ( Site 0254)
New York, New York, United States
Duke University Health System ( Site 0252)
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center ( Site 0244)
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC ( Site 0258)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Children's Medical Center ( Site 0257)
Dallas, Texas, United States
...and 30 more locations
Time frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant (up to 28 weeks)
Number of Participants Receiving Oral Granules With Palatability Response, Based on Taste of Medication on the First Day of Administration of Oral Formulation
Palatability was measured by response to a questionnaire on the taste of medication , with responses from very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad.
Time frame: Day 1 of administration of oral formulation up to Week 14 post-transplant (up to 18 weeks)
Number of Participants Receiving Oral Granules With Palatability Response, Based on Taste of Medication on the Eighth Day of Administration of Oral Formulation
Palatability was measured by response to a questionnaire on the taste of medication , with responses from very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad.
Time frame: Day 8 of administration of oral formulation up to Week 14 post-transplant (up to 18 weeks)