This is a study aimed at testing a commonly available and inexpensive chemical (hydrogen peroxide) for efficacy in sensitising large cancerous lumps in the breast to a standard course of radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced or recurrent breast cancer. Laboratory research and initial clinical trials in Japan suggest that 4 to 6 injections of a radiation sensitiser ('KORTUC') based on very dilute (0.5%) hydrogen peroxide injected into cancers under local anaesthetic twice a week during radiotherapy greatly increases the effectiveness of standard doses of radiotherapy alone. The side effects are limited to mild/moderate discomfort at the injection site for up to 24 hours reported by Japanese breast cancer patients in whom this treatment has been tested. Complete tumour shrinkage in 70/71 (98%) primary breast cancers up to 5 cm diameter have been reported by Japanese collaborators.
Aim: To test a slow release gel containing a commonly available and inexpensive chemical (hydrogen peroxide) for safety and activity in sensitizing large cancerous lumps in the breast or armpit to a standard 3-week course of radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced or recurrent breast cancer. Background: Laboratory research and initial clinical trials conducted in Japan raises the possibility that a simple and inexpensive treatment based on a very dilute (0.5%) hydrogen peroxide injected into cancers under local anaesthetic greatly increases the effectiveness of standard doses of radiotherapy. The side effects appear to be limited to mild/moderate discomfort at the injection site for up to 24 hours in one-third of patients. Rapid, complete and durable tumour disappearance has been reported in 49/55 bulky breast cancers in Japanese women treated using this approach, a response that is at least 3 times the success rate of radiotherapy alone in our own patients and in a contemporary Japanese control population. The inventor, Prof Ogawa of Kochi University, has approached the investigators to lead the further clinical evaluation and commercial development, starting with the proposed early phase trials testing safety and anti-cancer activity described below. Design and methods: After numbing the skin with local anaesthetic, a specialist doctor (radiologist) or trained radiographer will use ultrasound to guide the injection of a small volume of dilute (0.5%) hydrogen peroxide solution into the tumour twice a week during 3 weeks of standard radiotherapy. The drug is suspended in a natural gel (1% sodium hyaluronate, licensed for treating stiff knee joints) that ensures its slow release over 48 hours. The injection procedure lasts for 10-15 minutes altogether. Tiny oxygen bubbles are released from the hydrogen peroxide which help the radiologist guide the injection of drug to the proper places under the skin. We have recently completed a safety study confirming the mildness of side effects in 12 patients, and we now wish to test activity against cancer in a randomised controlled trial in 184 patients. Patients participating in Phase II will either have standard radiotherapy or the same radiotherapy plus the drug under test. Neither the patient nor the doctor will choose who has which treatment, which is allocated randomly. Patient and public involvement: Independent Cancer Patient Voice, a patient advocate group in the field of cancer, is collaborating with the investigators on the research plan, commenting and advising on the content and clarity of the written proposal. This group plays a prominent role in promoting UK clinical research, being represented on the Trial Management Groups of several national randomised cancer clinical trials. Dissemination: The results of this study will be presented at scientific meetings and at meetings of the patient advocate group in order to judge if the results for safety and activity are promising enough to justify taking the research further.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
184
Hydrogen Peroxide
Regional Cancer Centre (RCC)
Trivandrum, Kerala, India
Christian Medical Centre
Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Tata Medical Centre
Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Tata Memorial Centre
Mumbai, India
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, United Kingdom
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, United Kingdom
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Sutton, United Kingdom
Complete tumour response based on best response assessed by contrast enhanced MRI according to criteria outlined in Section 3.2.1 of the trial protocol, performed up to and including 12 months post radiotherapy
Time frame: Up to and including 12 months post radiotherapy
Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months post radiotherapy
Loco-regional progression-free survival and distant recurrence at 6, 12 and 24 months
Time frame: 12 and 24 months post radiotherapy
Proportion of patients with either complete response on MRI up to and including 12 months or pathological complete response following tumour resection before 12 months
Time frame: Up to and including 12 months post radiotherapy
Proportion of patients with partial response and stable disease
Time frame: 12 and 24 months post radiotherapy
Planned/unplanned tumour excision and pathological response recorded at post-RT follow-up visits
Time frame: During 24-month follow up period
Adverse events (assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0)
Time frame: Up to 90 days post radiotherapy
Compliance with KORTUC injections prior to radiotherapy
Time frame: During radiotherapy, an average of 3 weeks
Pain at target tumour site following KORTUC injections (10-point scale)
Time frame: During radiotherapy, an average of 3 weeks
Proportion of patients withdrawing from study due to pain from intratumoural injections recorded at 2-week post-RT visit
Time frame: During radiotherapy, an average of 3 weeks
Patient-reported quality of life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23)
Time frame: During 24-month follow up period
Resource use and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) for health economics analysis
Time frame: During 24-month follow up period
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.