In the experimental study, the well-established trauma film paradigm will be used to investigate the impact of expectations on the development of intrusive memories as a hallmark symptom of PTSD.
The study aims to examine the influence of different expectations on the development of intrusive memories by using a well-established experimental paradigm - the trauma film paradigm. In healthy volunteers, intrusion-like symptoms are to be induced with an analogue stressor, i.e., aversive film clip footage (trauma film). After viewing this so-called trauma film, the expectations of intrusions during the following week are manipulated by assigning participants randomly to three different groups. In the first group, negative expectations are induced (experimental group 1), the second group is exposed to positive expectations (experimental group 2) and a third group does not face any kind of manipulation of their expectations (control group). Participants are asked to report occurring intrusions in a diary during the following week and are invited to a subsequent cued laboratory inquiry at follow-up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
90
Participants are watching a video tape of a trauma expert who provides selective information on the development of intrusive memories. This video tape aims to increase positive expectations.
Participants are watching a video tape of a trauma expert who provides selective information on the development of intrusive memories. This video tape aims to increase negative expectations.
Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Interventions, Department of Psychology, Philipps University Marburg
Marburg, Hesse, Germany
Frequency and severity of intrusive memories: Daily intrusion diary
Participants are asked to complete a pen-and-paper diary 7 days in a row, reporting on intrusive memories in reference to the trauma film. They are asked to state the number of intrusions per day; each day of the diary is labeled and split into three sections (morning, afternoon, evening), and they are asked to mark in a box in the appropriate section when they experienced an intrusion. For each intrusion, they indicate the quality of the intrusion (image, thought or both), the intensity of and distress caused by the intrusion both on a scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("extremely"), the content of the intrusion, and the situation in which the intrusion occurred. Intrusive memory frequency across 7 days are calculated, whilst higher sum scores represent more intrusions. Severity of intrusions are calculated by combining the average score of the intensity and distress scale across all intrusions, whilst higher values indicate higher intensity/distress of reported intrusions.
Time frame: Record of any intrusive memories of the trauma film content for Days 1 to 7 after the experimental manipulation.
Distress caused by the trauma film: Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)
Participants are asked to respond 22 items in reference to the trauma film (e.g., "Pictures about the film popped into my mind.") by indicating how often each reaction occurred during the past seven days with respect to the film they watched last week. Items are rated on a 4-point-Likert-scale ranging from 0 ("not at all"), 1 ("rare"), 3 ("sometimes") to 5 ("often"). The IES-R consists of three subscales: "intrusion", "hyperarousal", and "avoidance". The total score (sum score for the total scale comprising the sum scores of all three subscales) is calculated ranging from 0 to 110 with higher values represent a worse outcome, i.e., higher total distress due to the trauma film in the past week. In addition, the sum score for the intrusion subscale is separately calculated ranging from 0 to 35 (Items 1, 3, 6, 9, 14, 16, 20) with higher values represent more intrusions due to the trauma film in the past week.
Time frame: At the follow-up measurement (7 days after the experimental manipulation).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Laboratory assessment of intrusive memories: Intrusion Provocation Task (IPT)
In the Intrusion Provocation Task (IPT), participants are presented with a ten-second long neutral still image from each of the film clips. Immediately afterwards for the next two minutes, they are allowed to think freely and report intrusions by raising a finger. The investigator counts how often the participant lifts his finger in the two minutes. The IPT intrusion score is calculated by the total frequency of intrusions, whilst higher values represent more intrusions.
Time frame: At the follow-up measurement (7 days after the experimental manipulation).