Can Training Increase Reporting Accuracy and Study Power in Human Pain Trials

Overview

In previous studies, results of both the Focused Analgesia Selection Test (FAST) procedure, a method to assess pain-reporting accuracy, and the Evoked Pain Training (EPT) procedure, aimed to improve pain-reporting accuracy, correlated with the placebo response. The objectives of the current project were to determine if EPT (1) increases pain reporting accuracy and (2) affect the placebo response in experimental pain study.

Analgesic trials suffer from low assay-sensitivity, and experts in the field are concerned that many previous negative analgesic trails might be regarded as failed trails. Major contributor to this concern is the large placebo response observed in analgesic clinical trials. Recent findings from the investigators group suggest that improving pain reporting accuracy could increase analgesic trials assay sensitivity by reducing the placebo response. In previous studies, the investigators developed the Focused Analgesia Selection Test (FAST), a method to assess pain reporting accuracy. Later on, the investigators developed the Evoked Pain Training (EPT), aimed to improve pain reporting accuracy. Both these methods constitute the core of this project. The objectives of the current project are to determine if subject training increases (1) pain reporting accuracy and (2) the power of an analgesic trial. Summary of main methods This project objectives will be achieved by preforming a two-stage study. First, all subjects undergo baseline assessments, including assessment of pain reporting accuracy (the FAST procedure) (visit #1). Then, subjects enter the first study stage (training stage), in which half of study subjects (n=50) undergo training to improve pain reporting accuracy. The training comprise of three in-clinic visits (visits #2, 3, 4) in which subjects receive feedback on accuracy of pain reports in response to noxious stimuli of various intensities (the EPT procedure). The EPT is based on repeated application of the FAST procedure, while providing feedback to subjects in between applications. The other half of subjects (n=50) undergo a "shame-training". After completion of the training phase, all subjects enter an experimental cross-over study design (second study phase) comprised of two in-clinic visits (visits 5 and 6). In each of these two visits, subjects undergo a battery of experimental pain tests (pre-treatment assessment), take one of two pills (either Ibuprofen 400 mg or identical sugar pill) in a random order, wait approximately 1 hour, and then undergo the same pain tests again (post-treatment assessment).

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Locations (1)

Outcomes

Central Contacts