This will be a randomized, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of nasal high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) vs. low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) on cycling endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
This will be a randomized, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of nasal HFOT vs. LFOT on cycling endurance in patients with COPD. Each patient will perform two constant load cycling exercise tests to exhaustion using HFOT and LFOT on two consecutive days, respectively, according to randomization. The load of the cycle ergometer will be set at 75% of the individually estimated maximum work rate (Wmax). During exercise tests, LFOT will be provided by a standard nasal cannula at a flow rate of 3 L/min using an oxygen concentrator. HFOT will be applied by a dedicated large bore nasal cannula at a flow rate 60 L/min, FiO2 45%, temperature 32 °C, using a HFOT device.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
79
HFOT will be applied by a dedicated large bore nasal cannula (Optiflow+, Fisher\&Paykel, New Zealand) at a flow rate 60 L/min, FiO2 45%, temperature 32 °C, using a HFOT device (myAIRVO2, Fisher\&Paykel, New Zealand).
LFOT will be provided by a standard nasal cannula at a flow rate of 3 L/min using an oxygen concentrator (EverFlow, Philips Respironics).
National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Exercise endurance time in seconds
Difference in the exercise endurance time between HFOT vs. LFOT during a constant load exercise test at 75% of the maximal work capacity.
Time frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Dyspnea sensation
Difference in the exercise induced dyspnea sensation between HFOT vs LFOT assessed by the BORG CR10 scale ranging from 0 "no dyspnea at all" to 10 "Maximum of dyspnea" assessed at the end of exercise.
Time frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Subjective leg fatigue sensation
Difference in the exercise induced subjective leg fatigue sensation between HFOT vs LFOT assessed by the BORG CR10 scale ranging from 0 "no leg fatigue at all" to 10 "Maximum of leg fatigue" assessed at the end of exercise.
Time frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Arterial blood gases
Difference of parameters in the arterial blood gases, in particular pH, SaO2, PaO2 and PaCO2 between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
Time frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Heart rate in bpm
Difference in the maximal heart rate assessed by ECG between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
Time frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Arterial blood pressure in mmHg
Difference in the maximal blood pressure between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
Time frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.