The "no Biopsy Approach" for Heart Transplantation Follow-up

Overview

Pathological analysis is the gold standard for diagnosis of acute allograft rejection after heart transplantation (HTx). This method requires repeated endomyocardial biopsies during the first post-operative year. However the sensitivity of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is not perfect and can be associated with major complications including fatal tamponade. Moreover, repeated biopsies are associated with reduced quality of life for HTx recipients. Since almost 20 years, the investigators do not perform routinely EMB for acute rejection screening. Early left ventricular diastolic dysfunction was investigated according to a standardized protocol. The investigators sought to analyze the long-term post-transplant outcomes without systematic EMB. The investigators hypothesize that exclusive echographic screening was not associated with impaired outcomes.

Demographic characteristics of heart transplant recipients and organ donors were prospectively collected in a local database. All HTx successively performed in the Hospital Marie Lannelongue from 1990 to 2016 were included. From 1990 to 1997, both EMB and cardiac echo were routinely performed at each medical follow-up date. After 1997, only cardiac echo was used to detect early acute allograft rejection. The investigators collected the results of all EMB and synchronous cardiac echo in patients transplanted between 1990 and 1997 (group A, validation cohort), and clinical events and long-term survival in patients transplanted from 1998 to 2016 (group B, standardization cohort). For our purpose, the investigators graded the histological patterns of acute cardiac rejection according to the 1990 international classification. Cardiac echo assessment included the isovolumic relaxation time, E-wave velocity and E/A ratio. Impaired left ventricular relaxation was consistent with acute cardiac rejection. The investigators therefore analyzed the rate of positive and negative EMB during the first post-transplant year and compared these results to the synchronous cardiac echo report in group A. Sensibility and specificity of cardiac echo to detect acute cardiac rejection were calculated. The rate of acute cardiac rejection during the first year was collected in group B and compared to group A. Finally, long-term survival was analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier approach and compared between group A and B (log-rank test). The investigators hypothesize that the participant will not observe any differences between groups considering the rate of acute cardiac rejection during the first year. In addition, the investigators do not expect to find any significant difference in long-term survival between the two cohorts. These findings may have a major impact on HTx follow-up since systematic EMB could be replaced by a standardized cardiac echo protocol focusing on left ventricular wall relaxation. EMB should therefore only be indicated in case of acute allograft dysfunction without evidence of rejection on conventional cardiac echo.