Data of 100 patients with spinal metastatic tumor who received stereotactic radiotherapy or conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the multi-center of the research group from July 2019 to June 2021 will be collected, as well as their follow-up data.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.
In this study, Data of 100 patients with spinal metastatic tumor who received stereotactic radiotherapy or conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the multi-center of the research group from July 2019 to June 2021 will be collected, as well as their follow-up data.The metastases were treated with SBRT.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).The metastases were treated with Conventionally-fractionated image- guided Intensity modulated radiotherapy.Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.PTV = GTV + 0-10mm Target volume radiation dose: The range of BED value of radiotherapy was 60-72 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was more than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10) and 51.3-59.5 when the distance between the tumor and gastrointestinal tract or spinal cord was less than 5 mm (alpha/beta=10).
Using multimodal image fusion to outline the target area.The dose of the target volume radiotherapy dose is 30 Gy/10f or 40Gy/20f.Previous treatment and follow-up data will be analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and conventionally-fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for spinal metastatic tumors, local control rate and side effects, and to clarify the effectiveness and safety of different doses of radiotherapy.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGThe fifth medical center of PLA general hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
RECRUITINGGuangxi ruikang hospital
Nanning, Guangxi, China
RECRUITINGThird Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
Guiyang, Guizhou, China
RECRUITINGGEM flower hospital of Liaohe oil field Tang-Du Hospital
Panjin, Liaoning, China
RECRUITINGHiser Medical Center of Qingdao
Qingdao, Shandong, China
RECRUITINGQingdao chengyang people's hospital
Qingdao, Shandong, China
RECRUITINGSecond hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
RECRUITINGTangdu hospital
Xian, Shanxi, China
RECRUITINGMianyang Central Hospital
Mianyang, Sichuan, China
RECRUITINGCancer pain score
Numerical grading (NRS) should be used for pain intensity assessment, and facial expression pain scoring should be used for patients with difficulty in expression.
Time frame: 1 year after the treatment
Muscle strength and muscle tension grading
Muscle strength and muscle tension were graded by Numbers
Time frame: 1 year after the treatment
JOA score of cervical and lumbar vertebrae
JOA score of cervical and lumbar vertebrae
Time frame: 2 years after the treatment
Quality of Life Score of Tumor Patients(0-60)
Common methods for evaluating the quality of life of patients:The full score of quality of life is 60, the worst is \< 20, the worse is 21-30, the average is 31-40, the better is 41-50, and the good is 51-60.
Time frame: 2 years after the treatment
Duration of pain response
Time from complete or partial pain relief to pain worsening (≥ 3 points on the NRPS
Time frame: 1 years after the treatment
Overall survival
The time from enrollment to death from any cause
Time frame: 3 years after the treatment
Local control rate
The rate at which lesions remained stable during follow-up
Time frame: 3 years after the treatment
Adverse reactions
Adverse reactions during and after treatment
Time frame: 6 months after the treatment
Progression-free survival
Time from treatment to cancer progression or death
Time frame: 3 years after the treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.