This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab + either cisplatin or carboplatin + gemcitabine versus placebo+ either cisplatin or carboplatin + gemcitabine in approximately 420 participants with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have not received prior systemic therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
420
200 mg administered Intravenously (IV) as specified in the treatment arm
Tislelizumab placebo to match
70 mg/m2 administered IV as specified in the treatment arm
Overall survival (OS) in the Intent to Treat (ITT) set
Time frame: From first randomization up to 3.5 years, approximately
Overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 in ITT
the proportion of participants who had Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: From first randomization up to 3.5 years, approximately
Duration of response (DOR)
the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to documented Progressive Disease (PD), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: From first randomization up to 3.5 years, approximately
Progression-free survival (PFS)
the time from randomization to the first objectively documented PD, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, as determined by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: From first randomization up to 3.5 years, approximately
Overall survival rate at 1 and 2 years for each treatment arm
the proportion of OS participants at 1 year and 2 years from randomization in the ITT Analysis Set
Time frame: From first randomization up to 3.5 years, approximately
Change from baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core 30(EORTC QLQC30)
1\) to assess overall health status/Quality of Life with 2 questions which are with range from minimum score 1 as worse outcome and maximum score 7 as higher values represent a better 2) to assess quality of life with 28 questions about Physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning etc. which are with range from minimum scores 1 representing as better to maximum scores 4 as worse outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
1000 mg/m2 administered IV as specified in the treatment arm
Area Under the Curve (AUC) 4.5 administered IV as specified in the treatment arm
Anhui Provincial Hospital
Hefei, Anhui, China
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Fifth Medical Center of Pla General Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Chinese Pla General Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Chongqing Cancer Hospital
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
Southwest Hospital
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
...and 36 more locations
Time frame: From first randomization up to 3.5 years, approximately
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs)
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)v5.0
Time frame: From first randomization up to 3.5years, approximately
Change from baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension, 5-Level version (EQ-5D-5L)
to assess health status with 1) 5 questions about Mobility, Self-Care, Usual activities, Pain/Discomfort, Anxiety/Depression which are with 5 options. 2) one question about health status at the day of completing the questionnaire with range from minimum score 0 as worse outcome to maximum scores 100 as higher values represent as better.
Time frame: From first randomization up to 3.5 years, approximately