In recent years, many studies have pointed out that bacterial toxin and cytokine storm are the main causes of shock and multiple organ failure in patients with sepsis. Endotoxin is the main vehicle for systemic inflammatory reaction caused by gram-negative bacteria which induce sepsis. Endotoxin binds to Toll- Like receptor 4 (TLR4) trigger a cytokine storm. The amount of endotoxin is associated with shock, insufficient intestinal perfusion, and poor prognosis. Therefore, clinicians try to use various methods to antagonize the action of endotoxin, which can reduce the cytokine storm and inflammatory response to improve the prognosis of sepsis. Continuous venous venous hemofiltration plays a role in blood purification in septic shock. With different hemofiltration filters, it has different effects. By removing the inflammatory mediators caused by bacterial toxins and cytokines, shock can be improved. The study plans to receive patients with septic shock and use a hemofiltration filter that adsorbs endotoxin and removes cytokines (oXiris, Baxter Healthcare) to perform continuous venous venous hemofiltration in addition to basic septic shock resuscitation. The effect on the concentration of cytokines in the blood, the infusion dose of inotropics, the fluid balances, and the degree of organ damage was evaluated. It is hoped that the results of this pilot study can lead us to subsequent randomized clinical trials to explore whether this filter can improve the prognosis of septic shock patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
12
Continuous venovenous hemofiltration and adsorption (CVVHA) with oXiris filter for up to 72 hours if required. The filter will be replaced every 24 hours. The setting of CVVHA is as follows: blood flow rate 200 mL/min, replacement fluid rate 2000 mL/hr, pre-dilution 50% and post-dilution 50%. If continuous renal replacement therapy is indicated after 72 hours, conventional hemofiltration filters will be used.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Difference of serum interleukin-6 level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-6 level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-6 level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-1β level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-1β level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-1β level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-10 level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-10 level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of serum interleukin-10 level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of serum procalcitonin level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of serum procalcitonin level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of serum procalcitonin level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of mean arterial pressure
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of mean arterial pressure
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of mean arterial pressure
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of cardiac output
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of cardiac output
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of cardiac output
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of norepinephrine infusion rate
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of norepinephrine infusion rate
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of norepinephrine infusion rate
Comparison to enrollment
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of the sequential organ failure assessment score
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of the sequential organ failure assessment score
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of the sequential organ failure assessment score
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of serum endocan level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of serum endocan level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of serum endocan level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of serum diamine oxidase level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of serum diamine oxidase level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of serum diamine oxidase level
Comparison to enrollment or between 2 groups
Time frame: 72 hours
Difference of daily IV fluids
Comparison between 2 groups
Time frame: 24 hours
Difference of daily IV fluids
Comparison between 2 groups
Time frame: 48 hours
Difference of daily IV fluids
Comparison between 2 groups
Time frame: 72 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.