Background * In the 19th century, Sir John Charnley successfully introduced total joint replacements for hips. In order to prevent implant fixation failure and accelerated polyethylene wear, it was initially recommended that implants were systematically positioned in a "biomechanically-friendly" way, which disregarded most of the individual anatomy (medialized acetabular cup, systematized cup version and inclination, etc.) * While those initial surgical techniques made popular and clinically successful total joint replacements, many complications (aseptic loosening, pain, excessive wear) have remained and mainly the persistence of frequent instability after THA. In response to those complications, many improvements were developed in the area of joint replacement over the last few decades, with one the most recent dating from 2017 and being the development of a surgical technique Rationale * The kinematic alignment (KA) technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA) aims at restoring the acetabular center of rotation and as much as possible the constitutional acetabular anteversion by using the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) as a reference landmark. Also, the technique aims (1) at making personalized choice for the hip component design, (2) at defining the cup positioning, and (3) at sometimes considering additional spine surgery based on the assessment of the individual spine-hip relation. * KA techniques for hip replacements are relatively new, likely to become popular over time, and their true value remains to be determined.
* Objective: Evaluation of the kinematic alignment technique for hip prostheses in patient with hip osteoarthritis * Hypothesis: the consideration of hip pathoanatomy and lumbo-pelvic kinematic disorder when planning a hip replacement is likely to decrease the risk of prosthetic dislocation and improve patient function and satisfaction
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
460
Osteoarthritic patient undergoing the conventional technique or the kinematically aligned technique
Université de Paris
Paris, France
RECRUITINGDislocation rate
The rates of occurrence of hip dislocation (treated in the hospital or in an outpatient setting).
Time frame: Occurrence within the first year after primary total hip replacement
EuroQualityOfLife 5 dimension index (EQ5D)
EQ5D is a generic QoL scale from -0.6 to 1
Time frame: Preoperative, postoperative 6 months and 12 months . assessment for all parameters.
Oxford hip score (OHS)
OHS is a rate of hip function from 0 to 48
Time frame: Preoperative, postoperative 6 months and 12 months . assessment for all parameters.
satisfaction visual analogic scale (VAS)
satisfaction is a VAS score from 0 to 100
Time frame: Preoperative, postoperative 6 months and 12 months . assessment for all parameters.
Implant positioning parameter
Implant positioning parameters (inclination, version, offset) are computed on post-operative X rays acquisition.
Time frame: Preoperative, postoperative 6 months and 12 months . assessment for all parameters.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.